Siow Ming Lee, Madeleine Hewish, Samreen Ahmed, Dionysis Papadatos-Pastos, Eleni Karapanagiotou, Fiona Blackhall, Amy Ford, Robin Young, Angel Garcia, Arvind Arora, Abigail Hollingdale, Tanya Ahmad, Martin Forster, Alastair Greystoke, Fion Bremner, Robin Rudd, Laura Farrelly, Simran Vaja, Allan Hackshaw
{"title":"羟氯喹联合铂双重化疗作为广泛期小细胞肺癌的一线治疗(研究15):一项随机II期多中心试验","authors":"Siow Ming Lee, Madeleine Hewish, Samreen Ahmed, Dionysis Papadatos-Pastos, Eleni Karapanagiotou, Fiona Blackhall, Amy Ford, Robin Young, Angel Garcia, Arvind Arora, Abigail Hollingdale, Tanya Ahmad, Martin Forster, Alastair Greystoke, Fion Bremner, Robin Rudd, Laura Farrelly, Simran Vaja, Allan Hackshaw","doi":"10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) present with extensive-stage (ES) disease and have a poor prognosis despite achieving high initial response rates to platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. This study evaluated whether adding hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) to chemotherapy could improve outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomised multicentre phase II trial. Eligible patients had untreated ES-SCLC, a performance status 0-2 and measurable disease. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to HCQ (400 mg orally twice daily) plus carboplatin-gemcitabine or carboplatin-etoposide alone. Chemotherapy was administered for up to six cycles, with HCQ given concurrently and then as single agent for up to 30 months. Primary endpoint was PFS, aiming for a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.70.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>72 patients were randomised (36 HCQ+chemotherapy and 36 chemotherapy alone). Median HCQ treatment duration was 4.4 months. HCQ did not improve PFS (HR 1·12 95 %CI 0·69-1.84; p = 0·64), with a median of 5.7 months (HCQ+chemotherapy) versus 6.2 months (chemotherapy). The corresponding median OS were 8.9 and 10.2 months (HR 0.83, 95 %CI 0.48-1.45, p = 0.52). Fewer patients in the HCQ arm completed four cycles of chemotherapy due to adverse events (64 % vs. 81 %). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were higher in the HCQ+chemotherapy arm (83.3 % vs. 27.8 %), primarily anaemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia, partly due to the initially higher gemcitabine dose used CONCLUSIONS: Combining HCQ with platinum doublet chemotherapy did not improve PFS or OS outcomes for ES-SCLC, resulting in more patients stopping chemotherapy due to increased adverse events. When considered alongside other randomised studies of HCQ in cancer, the evidence collectively indicates a limited role for HCQ as a therapeutic option.</p>","PeriodicalId":11980,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer","volume":"215 ","pages":"115162"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hydroxychloroquine in combination with platinum doublet chemotherapy as first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (Study 15): A randomised phase II multicentre trial.\",\"authors\":\"Siow Ming Lee, Madeleine Hewish, Samreen Ahmed, Dionysis Papadatos-Pastos, Eleni Karapanagiotou, Fiona Blackhall, Amy Ford, Robin Young, Angel Garcia, Arvind Arora, Abigail Hollingdale, Tanya Ahmad, Martin Forster, Alastair Greystoke, Fion Bremner, Robin Rudd, Laura Farrelly, Simran Vaja, Allan Hackshaw\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) present with extensive-stage (ES) disease and have a poor prognosis despite achieving high initial response rates to platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. This study evaluated whether adding hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) to chemotherapy could improve outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomised multicentre phase II trial. Eligible patients had untreated ES-SCLC, a performance status 0-2 and measurable disease. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to HCQ (400 mg orally twice daily) plus carboplatin-gemcitabine or carboplatin-etoposide alone. Chemotherapy was administered for up to six cycles, with HCQ given concurrently and then as single agent for up to 30 months. Primary endpoint was PFS, aiming for a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.70.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>72 patients were randomised (36 HCQ+chemotherapy and 36 chemotherapy alone). Median HCQ treatment duration was 4.4 months. HCQ did not improve PFS (HR 1·12 95 %CI 0·69-1.84; p = 0·64), with a median of 5.7 months (HCQ+chemotherapy) versus 6.2 months (chemotherapy). The corresponding median OS were 8.9 and 10.2 months (HR 0.83, 95 %CI 0.48-1.45, p = 0.52). Fewer patients in the HCQ arm completed four cycles of chemotherapy due to adverse events (64 % vs. 81 %). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were higher in the HCQ+chemotherapy arm (83.3 % vs. 27.8 %), primarily anaemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia, partly due to the initially higher gemcitabine dose used CONCLUSIONS: Combining HCQ with platinum doublet chemotherapy did not improve PFS or OS outcomes for ES-SCLC, resulting in more patients stopping chemotherapy due to increased adverse events. When considered alongside other randomised studies of HCQ in cancer, the evidence collectively indicates a limited role for HCQ as a therapeutic option.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Cancer\",\"volume\":\"215 \",\"pages\":\"115162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115162\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115162","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:大多数小细胞肺癌(SCLC)患者存在广泛期(ES)疾病,尽管铂类双重化疗具有较高的初始缓解率,但预后较差。本研究评估在化疗中加入羟氯喹(HCQ)是否能改善预后。方法:这是一项随机多中心II期试验。符合条件的患者为未经治疗的ES-SCLC,性能状态为0-2,疾病可测量。患者被随机分配(1:1比例)至HCQ (400mg口服,每日2次)加卡铂-吉西他滨或单独卡铂-依托泊苷组。化疗长达6个周期,HCQ同时给予,然后作为单一药物给予长达30个月。主要终点为PFS,目标风险比(HR)为0.70。结果:72例患者随机分组(36例HCQ+化疗,36例单独化疗)。中位HCQ治疗持续时间为4.4个月。HCQ没有改善PFS (HR 1.12 95% CI 0.69 -1.84;p = 0.64),中位时间为5.7个月(HCQ+化疗),而中位时间为6.2个月(化疗)。相应的中位OS分别为8.9和10.2个月(HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.48-1.45, p = 0.52)。由于不良事件,HCQ组完成4个化疗周期的患者较少(64%对81%)。HCQ+化疗组≥3级不良事件较高(83.3%对27.8%),主要是贫血、中性粒细胞减少症和血小板减少症,部分原因是最初使用的吉西他滨剂量较高。结论:HCQ联合铂双药化疗并不能改善ES-SCLC的PFS或OS结果,导致更多患者因不良事件增加而停止化疗。当与其他HCQ在癌症中的随机研究一起考虑时,证据表明HCQ作为治疗选择的作用有限。
Hydroxychloroquine in combination with platinum doublet chemotherapy as first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (Study 15): A randomised phase II multicentre trial.
Background: Most patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) present with extensive-stage (ES) disease and have a poor prognosis despite achieving high initial response rates to platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. This study evaluated whether adding hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) to chemotherapy could improve outcomes.
Methods: This was a randomised multicentre phase II trial. Eligible patients had untreated ES-SCLC, a performance status 0-2 and measurable disease. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to HCQ (400 mg orally twice daily) plus carboplatin-gemcitabine or carboplatin-etoposide alone. Chemotherapy was administered for up to six cycles, with HCQ given concurrently and then as single agent for up to 30 months. Primary endpoint was PFS, aiming for a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.70.
Results: 72 patients were randomised (36 HCQ+chemotherapy and 36 chemotherapy alone). Median HCQ treatment duration was 4.4 months. HCQ did not improve PFS (HR 1·12 95 %CI 0·69-1.84; p = 0·64), with a median of 5.7 months (HCQ+chemotherapy) versus 6.2 months (chemotherapy). The corresponding median OS were 8.9 and 10.2 months (HR 0.83, 95 %CI 0.48-1.45, p = 0.52). Fewer patients in the HCQ arm completed four cycles of chemotherapy due to adverse events (64 % vs. 81 %). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were higher in the HCQ+chemotherapy arm (83.3 % vs. 27.8 %), primarily anaemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia, partly due to the initially higher gemcitabine dose used CONCLUSIONS: Combining HCQ with platinum doublet chemotherapy did not improve PFS or OS outcomes for ES-SCLC, resulting in more patients stopping chemotherapy due to increased adverse events. When considered alongside other randomised studies of HCQ in cancer, the evidence collectively indicates a limited role for HCQ as a therapeutic option.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Cancer (EJC) serves as a comprehensive platform integrating preclinical, digital, translational, and clinical research across the spectrum of cancer. From epidemiology, carcinogenesis, and biology to groundbreaking innovations in cancer treatment and patient care, the journal covers a wide array of topics. We publish original research, reviews, previews, editorial comments, and correspondence, fostering dialogue and advancement in the fight against cancer. Join us in our mission to drive progress and improve outcomes in cancer research and patient care.