Jacob Taylor , Ashish M. Kamat , Drupad Annapureddy , Zine-Eddine Khene , Jeffrey Howard , Wei Shen Tan , Ian M. McElree , Davaro Facundo , Kendrick Yim , Stephen Harrington , Elizabeth Dyer , Anna J. Black , Pratik Kanabur , Mathieu Roumiguié , Seth Lerner , Peter C. Black , Jay D. Raman , Mark Preston , Gary Steinberg , William Huang , Michael A. O’Donnell
{"title":"连续膀胱内注射吉西他滨和多西他赛与卡介苗-谷氨酰胺治疗卡介苗-谷氨酰胺无反应的非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌患者的肿瘤预后比较","authors":"Jacob Taylor , Ashish M. Kamat , Drupad Annapureddy , Zine-Eddine Khene , Jeffrey Howard , Wei Shen Tan , Ian M. McElree , Davaro Facundo , Kendrick Yim , Stephen Harrington , Elizabeth Dyer , Anna J. Black , Pratik Kanabur , Mathieu Roumiguié , Seth Lerner , Peter C. Black , Jay D. Raman , Mark Preston , Gary Steinberg , William Huang , Michael A. O’Donnell","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients treated with additional bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) may become unresponsive to BCG. Recently, sequential intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel (gem/doce) are being used for NMIBC. This study aims to compare oncologic outcomes between sequential intravesical gem/doce versus additional BCG in patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were collected from ten academic institutions on patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC based on the Food and Drug Administration guidelines. Information on high-grade recurrence-free (HGRFS), progression-free (PFS), cystectomy-free (CFS), metastasis-free (MFS), cancer-specific (CSS), and overall (OS) survival was collected. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) were used to determine differences in oncologic outcomes between the Gem/Doce and BCG groups.</div></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><div>Of 299 total patients, 204 underwent additional BCG treatment at the time of BCG unresponsiveness and 95 underwent gem/doce treatment. Rates of PFS (HR 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1–5.0, <em>p</em> = 0.03), CFS (HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2–3.4, <em>p</em> = 0.01), and CSS (HR 3.7, 95% CI 1.1–12.3, <em>p</em>=0.03) were higher in patients receiving gem/doce. HGRFS, MFS, and OS were similar between both groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><div>The findings from this study suggest that intravesical gem/doce is associated with lower rates of progression than additional BCG in patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC who decline or are ineligible for cystectomy.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>In this report, we looked at outcomes between patients with noninvasive bladder cancer who were treated with additional bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) or gemcitabine-docetaxel combination after not responding to primary BCG therapy. We found that intravesical gemcitabine-docetaxel was associated with fewer progression events than additional salvage BCG therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":"8 2","pages":"Pages 469-476"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oncologic Outcomes of Sequential Intravesical Gemcitabine and Docetaxel Compared with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin in Patients with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin–Unresponsive Non–Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Jacob Taylor , Ashish M. Kamat , Drupad Annapureddy , Zine-Eddine Khene , Jeffrey Howard , Wei Shen Tan , Ian M. McElree , Davaro Facundo , Kendrick Yim , Stephen Harrington , Elizabeth Dyer , Anna J. Black , Pratik Kanabur , Mathieu Roumiguié , Seth Lerner , Peter C. Black , Jay D. Raman , Mark Preston , Gary Steinberg , William Huang , Michael A. O’Donnell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euo.2024.12.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients treated with additional bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) may become unresponsive to BCG. Recently, sequential intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel (gem/doce) are being used for NMIBC. This study aims to compare oncologic outcomes between sequential intravesical gem/doce versus additional BCG in patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were collected from ten academic institutions on patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC based on the Food and Drug Administration guidelines. Information on high-grade recurrence-free (HGRFS), progression-free (PFS), cystectomy-free (CFS), metastasis-free (MFS), cancer-specific (CSS), and overall (OS) survival was collected. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) were used to determine differences in oncologic outcomes between the Gem/Doce and BCG groups.</div></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><div>Of 299 total patients, 204 underwent additional BCG treatment at the time of BCG unresponsiveness and 95 underwent gem/doce treatment. Rates of PFS (HR 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1–5.0, <em>p</em> = 0.03), CFS (HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2–3.4, <em>p</em> = 0.01), and CSS (HR 3.7, 95% CI 1.1–12.3, <em>p</em>=0.03) were higher in patients receiving gem/doce. HGRFS, MFS, and OS were similar between both groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><div>The findings from this study suggest that intravesical gem/doce is associated with lower rates of progression than additional BCG in patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC who decline or are ineligible for cystectomy.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>In this report, we looked at outcomes between patients with noninvasive bladder cancer who were treated with additional bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) or gemcitabine-docetaxel combination after not responding to primary BCG therapy. We found that intravesical gemcitabine-docetaxel was associated with fewer progression events than additional salvage BCG therapy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology oncology\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 469-476\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588931124002888\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588931124002888","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景与目的:非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)患者额外使用卡介苗(BCG)治疗可能对卡介苗无反应。最近,连续膀胱注射吉西他滨和多西他赛(gem/doce)被用于NMIBC。本研究旨在比较对BCG无反应的NMIBC患者连续膀胱内注射gem/doce与额外注射BCG的肿瘤学结果。方法:根据美国食品和药物管理局的指南,收集了10个学术机构关于bcg无反应的NMIBC患者的数据。收集了高级别无复发(HGRFS)、无进展(PFS)、无膀胱切除术(CFS)、无转移(MFS)、癌症特异性(CSS)和总生存率(OS)的信息。Kaplan-Meier法和Cox比例风险比(HRs)用于确定Gem/Doce组和BCG组之间肿瘤结局的差异。主要发现和局限性:299例患者中,204例在卡介苗无反应时接受了额外的卡介苗治疗,95例接受了gem/doce治疗。接受gem/doce治疗的患者PFS (HR 2.6, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.1-5.0, p=0.03)、CFS (HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.4, p= 0.01)和CSS (HR 3.7, 95% CI 1.1-12.3, p=0.03)发生率较高。两组间HGRFS、MFS和OS相似。结论和临床意义:本研究的结果表明,对于不适应或不适合膀胱切除术的无BCG应答的NMIBC患者,膀胱内gem/doce与额外的BCG相比,其进展率更低。患者总结:在本报告中,我们观察了在最初的卡介苗治疗无效后,接受卡介苗或吉西他滨-多西他赛联合治疗的非侵袭性膀胱癌患者之间的结果。我们发现膀胱内注射吉西他滨-多西他赛与额外的补救性卡介苗治疗相关的进展事件较少。
Oncologic Outcomes of Sequential Intravesical Gemcitabine and Docetaxel Compared with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin in Patients with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin–Unresponsive Non–Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
Background and objective
Non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients treated with additional bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) may become unresponsive to BCG. Recently, sequential intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel (gem/doce) are being used for NMIBC. This study aims to compare oncologic outcomes between sequential intravesical gem/doce versus additional BCG in patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC.
Methods
Data were collected from ten academic institutions on patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC based on the Food and Drug Administration guidelines. Information on high-grade recurrence-free (HGRFS), progression-free (PFS), cystectomy-free (CFS), metastasis-free (MFS), cancer-specific (CSS), and overall (OS) survival was collected. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) were used to determine differences in oncologic outcomes between the Gem/Doce and BCG groups.
Key findings and limitations
Of 299 total patients, 204 underwent additional BCG treatment at the time of BCG unresponsiveness and 95 underwent gem/doce treatment. Rates of PFS (HR 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1–5.0, p = 0.03), CFS (HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2–3.4, p = 0.01), and CSS (HR 3.7, 95% CI 1.1–12.3, p=0.03) were higher in patients receiving gem/doce. HGRFS, MFS, and OS were similar between both groups.
Conclusions and clinical implications
The findings from this study suggest that intravesical gem/doce is associated with lower rates of progression than additional BCG in patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC who decline or are ineligible for cystectomy.
Patient summary
In this report, we looked at outcomes between patients with noninvasive bladder cancer who were treated with additional bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) or gemcitabine-docetaxel combination after not responding to primary BCG therapy. We found that intravesical gemcitabine-docetaxel was associated with fewer progression events than additional salvage BCG therapy.
期刊介绍:
Journal Name: European Urology Oncology
Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology
Focus:
First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies
Aims to deliver high-quality research
Content:
Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews
Covers clinical, basic, and translational research
Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format