Jacob Taylor, Ashish M Kamat, Drupad Annapureddy, Zine-Eddine Khene, Jeffrey Howard, Wei Shen Tan, Ian M McElree, Davaro Facundo, Kendrick Yim, Stephen Harrington, Elizabeth Dyer, Anna J Black, Pratik Kanabur, Mathieu Roumiguié, Seth Lerner, Peter C Black, Jay Raman, Mark Preston, Gary Steinberg, William Huang, Roger Li, Vignesh T Packiam, Solomon L Woldu, Yair Lotan, Michael A O'Donnell
{"title":"连续膀胱内注射吉西他滨和多西他赛与卡介苗-谷氨酰胺治疗卡介苗-谷氨酰胺无反应的非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌患者的肿瘤预后比较","authors":"Jacob Taylor, Ashish M Kamat, Drupad Annapureddy, Zine-Eddine Khene, Jeffrey Howard, Wei Shen Tan, Ian M McElree, Davaro Facundo, Kendrick Yim, Stephen Harrington, Elizabeth Dyer, Anna J Black, Pratik Kanabur, Mathieu Roumiguié, Seth Lerner, Peter C Black, Jay Raman, Mark Preston, Gary Steinberg, William Huang, Roger Li, Vignesh T Packiam, Solomon L Woldu, Yair Lotan, Michael A O'Donnell","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients treated with additional bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) may become unresponsive to BCG. Recently, sequential intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel (gem/doce) are being used for NMIBC. This study aims to compare oncologic outcomes between sequential intravesical gem/doce versus additional BCG in patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from ten academic institutions on patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC based on the Food and Drug Administration guidelines. Information on high-grade recurrence-free (HGRFS), progression-free (PFS), cystectomy-free (CFS), metastasis-free (MFS), cancer-specific (CSS), and overall (OS) survival was collected. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) were used to determine differences in oncologic outcomes between the Gem/Doce and BCG groups.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Of 299 total patients, 204 underwent additional BCG treatment at the time of BCG unresponsiveness and 95 underwent gem/doce treatment. Rates of PFS (HR 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-5.0, p = 0.03), CFS (HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.4, p = 0.01), and CSS (HR 3.7, 95% CI 1.1-12.3, p=0.03) were higher in patients receiving gem/doce. HGRFS, MFS, and OS were similar between both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>The findings from this study suggest that intravesical gem/doce is associated with lower rates of progression than additional BCG in patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC who decline or are ineligible for cystectomy.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>In this report, we looked at outcomes between patients with noninvasive bladder cancer who were treated with additional bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) or gemcitabine-docetaxel combination after not responding to primary BCG therapy. We found that intravesical gemcitabine-docetaxel was associated with fewer progression events than additional salvage BCG therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oncologic Outcomes of Sequential Intravesical Gemcitabine and Docetaxel Compared with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin in Patients with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-Unresponsive Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Jacob Taylor, Ashish M Kamat, Drupad Annapureddy, Zine-Eddine Khene, Jeffrey Howard, Wei Shen Tan, Ian M McElree, Davaro Facundo, Kendrick Yim, Stephen Harrington, Elizabeth Dyer, Anna J Black, Pratik Kanabur, Mathieu Roumiguié, Seth Lerner, Peter C Black, Jay Raman, Mark Preston, Gary Steinberg, William Huang, Roger Li, Vignesh T Packiam, Solomon L Woldu, Yair Lotan, Michael A O'Donnell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euo.2024.12.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients treated with additional bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) may become unresponsive to BCG. Recently, sequential intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel (gem/doce) are being used for NMIBC. This study aims to compare oncologic outcomes between sequential intravesical gem/doce versus additional BCG in patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from ten academic institutions on patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC based on the Food and Drug Administration guidelines. Information on high-grade recurrence-free (HGRFS), progression-free (PFS), cystectomy-free (CFS), metastasis-free (MFS), cancer-specific (CSS), and overall (OS) survival was collected. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) were used to determine differences in oncologic outcomes between the Gem/Doce and BCG groups.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Of 299 total patients, 204 underwent additional BCG treatment at the time of BCG unresponsiveness and 95 underwent gem/doce treatment. Rates of PFS (HR 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-5.0, p = 0.03), CFS (HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.4, p = 0.01), and CSS (HR 3.7, 95% CI 1.1-12.3, p=0.03) were higher in patients receiving gem/doce. HGRFS, MFS, and OS were similar between both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>The findings from this study suggest that intravesical gem/doce is associated with lower rates of progression than additional BCG in patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC who decline or are ineligible for cystectomy.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>In this report, we looked at outcomes between patients with noninvasive bladder cancer who were treated with additional bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) or gemcitabine-docetaxel combination after not responding to primary BCG therapy. We found that intravesical gemcitabine-docetaxel was associated with fewer progression events than additional salvage BCG therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.12.005\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.12.005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景与目的:非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)患者额外使用卡介苗(BCG)治疗可能对卡介苗无反应。最近,连续膀胱注射吉西他滨和多西他赛(gem/doce)被用于NMIBC。本研究旨在比较对BCG无反应的NMIBC患者连续膀胱内注射gem/doce与额外注射BCG的肿瘤学结果。方法:根据美国食品和药物管理局的指南,收集了10个学术机构关于bcg无反应的NMIBC患者的数据。收集了高级别无复发(HGRFS)、无进展(PFS)、无膀胱切除术(CFS)、无转移(MFS)、癌症特异性(CSS)和总生存率(OS)的信息。Kaplan-Meier法和Cox比例风险比(HRs)用于确定Gem/Doce组和BCG组之间肿瘤结局的差异。主要发现和局限性:299例患者中,204例在卡介苗无反应时接受了额外的卡介苗治疗,95例接受了gem/doce治疗。接受gem/doce治疗的患者PFS (HR 2.6, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.1-5.0, p=0.03)、CFS (HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.4, p= 0.01)和CSS (HR 3.7, 95% CI 1.1-12.3, p=0.03)发生率较高。两组间HGRFS、MFS和OS相似。结论和临床意义:本研究的结果表明,对于不适应或不适合膀胱切除术的无BCG应答的NMIBC患者,膀胱内gem/doce与额外的BCG相比,其进展率更低。患者总结:在本报告中,我们观察了在最初的卡介苗治疗无效后,接受卡介苗或吉西他滨-多西他赛联合治疗的非侵袭性膀胱癌患者之间的结果。我们发现膀胱内注射吉西他滨-多西他赛与额外的补救性卡介苗治疗相关的进展事件较少。
Oncologic Outcomes of Sequential Intravesical Gemcitabine and Docetaxel Compared with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin in Patients with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-Unresponsive Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer.
Background and objective: Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients treated with additional bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) may become unresponsive to BCG. Recently, sequential intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel (gem/doce) are being used for NMIBC. This study aims to compare oncologic outcomes between sequential intravesical gem/doce versus additional BCG in patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC.
Methods: Data were collected from ten academic institutions on patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC based on the Food and Drug Administration guidelines. Information on high-grade recurrence-free (HGRFS), progression-free (PFS), cystectomy-free (CFS), metastasis-free (MFS), cancer-specific (CSS), and overall (OS) survival was collected. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) were used to determine differences in oncologic outcomes between the Gem/Doce and BCG groups.
Key findings and limitations: Of 299 total patients, 204 underwent additional BCG treatment at the time of BCG unresponsiveness and 95 underwent gem/doce treatment. Rates of PFS (HR 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-5.0, p = 0.03), CFS (HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.4, p = 0.01), and CSS (HR 3.7, 95% CI 1.1-12.3, p=0.03) were higher in patients receiving gem/doce. HGRFS, MFS, and OS were similar between both groups.
Conclusions and clinical implications: The findings from this study suggest that intravesical gem/doce is associated with lower rates of progression than additional BCG in patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC who decline or are ineligible for cystectomy.
Patient summary: In this report, we looked at outcomes between patients with noninvasive bladder cancer who were treated with additional bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) or gemcitabine-docetaxel combination after not responding to primary BCG therapy. We found that intravesical gemcitabine-docetaxel was associated with fewer progression events than additional salvage BCG therapy.
期刊介绍:
Journal Name: European Urology Oncology
Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology
Focus:
First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies
Aims to deliver high-quality research
Content:
Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews
Covers clinical, basic, and translational research
Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format