阿富汗公共卫生设施提供基本药物:应对社会政治和地理挑战。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health policy and planning Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1093/heapol/czae121
Margo van Gurp, Sandra Alba, Maida Ammiwala, Sayed Rahim Arab, Sayed Murtaza Sadaat, Fazelrabie Hanifi, Sohrab Safi, Nasratullah Ansari, Maiza Campos-Ponce, Maarten Olivier Kok
{"title":"阿富汗公共卫生设施提供基本药物:应对社会政治和地理挑战。","authors":"Margo van Gurp, Sandra Alba, Maida Ammiwala, Sayed Rahim Arab, Sayed Murtaza Sadaat, Fazelrabie Hanifi, Sohrab Safi, Nasratullah Ansari, Maiza Campos-Ponce, Maarten Olivier Kok","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the past two decades, the Afghan government, along with international community, has developed a system aimed at improving access to essential health services under Afghanistan's challenging socio-political and geographical circumstances. In 31 provinces, non-state actors competed for fixed-term contracts to implement a predefined package of health services. In three provinces, the government organised the provision of health services. An independent third party monitored service provision, including access to medicines. This study examines the availability of essential medicines in Afghanistan's public health facilities and how this is shaped by socio-political challenges, geographical barriers, and the organisation of the health system. Between March and July 2021, enumerators collected data at 885 health facilities across Afghanistan. For our analysis, we combined data about medicine availability and the functioning of the health system with publicly available information about geographical and socio-political factors, including security incidents. Using regression analysis, we identified facility, district, and province-level factors related to medicines availability in public health facilities. On average, 70% of 31 selected essential medicines were available in 2021. The availability of medicines varies significantly between provinces and was considerably higher in those where services were contracted out to non-state actors (n=34; 91%) compared to provinces where service provision was organised by the government (n=3; 9%). The most important drivers of variation in medicine availability included geographical barriers, securing and allocating funds on the provincial level, and organising and sustaining physical capacity on the facility level. Insecurity was not a key factor driving variation in medicine availability. Despite the socio-political challenges in 2021, the availability of essential medicines in public health facilities was relatively high. The results suggest that decentralized procurement of medicines by non-state actors and timely payment of funds contribute to medicines availability. Strategies to improve medicines availability should target hard-to-reach areas and lower-level facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The availability of essential medicines in public health facilities in Afghanistan: navigating socio-political and geographical challenges.\",\"authors\":\"Margo van Gurp, Sandra Alba, Maida Ammiwala, Sayed Rahim Arab, Sayed Murtaza Sadaat, Fazelrabie Hanifi, Sohrab Safi, Nasratullah Ansari, Maiza Campos-Ponce, Maarten Olivier Kok\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/heapol/czae121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>During the past two decades, the Afghan government, along with international community, has developed a system aimed at improving access to essential health services under Afghanistan's challenging socio-political and geographical circumstances. In 31 provinces, non-state actors competed for fixed-term contracts to implement a predefined package of health services. In three provinces, the government organised the provision of health services. An independent third party monitored service provision, including access to medicines. This study examines the availability of essential medicines in Afghanistan's public health facilities and how this is shaped by socio-political challenges, geographical barriers, and the organisation of the health system. Between March and July 2021, enumerators collected data at 885 health facilities across Afghanistan. For our analysis, we combined data about medicine availability and the functioning of the health system with publicly available information about geographical and socio-political factors, including security incidents. Using regression analysis, we identified facility, district, and province-level factors related to medicines availability in public health facilities. On average, 70% of 31 selected essential medicines were available in 2021. The availability of medicines varies significantly between provinces and was considerably higher in those where services were contracted out to non-state actors (n=34; 91%) compared to provinces where service provision was organised by the government (n=3; 9%). The most important drivers of variation in medicine availability included geographical barriers, securing and allocating funds on the provincial level, and organising and sustaining physical capacity on the facility level. Insecurity was not a key factor driving variation in medicine availability. Despite the socio-political challenges in 2021, the availability of essential medicines in public health facilities was relatively high. The results suggest that decentralized procurement of medicines by non-state actors and timely payment of funds contribute to medicines availability. Strategies to improve medicines availability should target hard-to-reach areas and lower-level facilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health policy and planning\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health policy and planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czae121\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy and planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czae121","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去二十年中,阿富汗政府与国际社会一道制定了一个系统,旨在在阿富汗具有挑战性的社会政治和地理环境下改善获得基本卫生服务的机会。在31个省,非国家行为体竞争定期合同,以执行预先确定的一揽子保健服务。在三个省,政府组织提供保健服务。一个独立的第三方监测了服务的提供,包括药品的获取。本研究考察了阿富汗公共卫生设施中基本药物的可获得性,以及社会政治挑战、地理障碍和卫生系统组织如何影响基本药物的可获得性。2021年3月至7月期间,普查员在阿富汗各地的885个卫生设施收集了数据。在我们的分析中,我们将有关药物可获得性和卫生系统功能的数据与有关地理和社会政治因素(包括安全事件)的公开信息相结合。使用回归分析,我们确定了与公共卫生机构药物可得性相关的设施、地区和省级因素。2021年,31种选定基本药物中平均有70%可获得。各省之间的药品可得性差异很大,在将服务外包给非国家行为者的省份,药品可得性要高得多(n=34;91%),而服务提供由政府组织的省份(n=3;9%)。药品可得性差异的最重要驱动因素包括地理障碍、在省级获得和分配资金,以及在设施一级组织和维持物理能力。不安全感不是导致药品可得性变化的关键因素。尽管2021年面临社会政治挑战,但公共卫生设施中基本药物的可得性相对较高。结果表明,非国家行为体分散采购药品和及时支付资金有助于药品供应。改善药品供应的战略应针对难以到达的地区和较低水平的设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The availability of essential medicines in public health facilities in Afghanistan: navigating socio-political and geographical challenges.

During the past two decades, the Afghan government, along with international community, has developed a system aimed at improving access to essential health services under Afghanistan's challenging socio-political and geographical circumstances. In 31 provinces, non-state actors competed for fixed-term contracts to implement a predefined package of health services. In three provinces, the government organised the provision of health services. An independent third party monitored service provision, including access to medicines. This study examines the availability of essential medicines in Afghanistan's public health facilities and how this is shaped by socio-political challenges, geographical barriers, and the organisation of the health system. Between March and July 2021, enumerators collected data at 885 health facilities across Afghanistan. For our analysis, we combined data about medicine availability and the functioning of the health system with publicly available information about geographical and socio-political factors, including security incidents. Using regression analysis, we identified facility, district, and province-level factors related to medicines availability in public health facilities. On average, 70% of 31 selected essential medicines were available in 2021. The availability of medicines varies significantly between provinces and was considerably higher in those where services were contracted out to non-state actors (n=34; 91%) compared to provinces where service provision was organised by the government (n=3; 9%). The most important drivers of variation in medicine availability included geographical barriers, securing and allocating funds on the provincial level, and organising and sustaining physical capacity on the facility level. Insecurity was not a key factor driving variation in medicine availability. Despite the socio-political challenges in 2021, the availability of essential medicines in public health facilities was relatively high. The results suggest that decentralized procurement of medicines by non-state actors and timely payment of funds contribute to medicines availability. Strategies to improve medicines availability should target hard-to-reach areas and lower-level facilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health policy and planning
Health policy and planning 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Planning publishes health policy and systems research focusing on low- and middle-income countries. Our journal provides an international forum for publishing original and high-quality research that addresses questions pertinent to policy-makers, public health researchers and practitioners. Health Policy and Planning is published 10 times a year.
期刊最新文献
A Political Economy Analysis of Health Policymaking in Nigeria: The Genesis of the 2014 National Health Act. Correction to: Capacity and crisis: examining the state-level policy response to COVID-19 in Tamil Nadu, India. Can public education campaigns equitably counter the use of substandard and falsified (SF) medical products in African countries? How has the concept of health system software been used in health policy and systems research? A scoping review. Strengthening local health systems and governance for Universal Health Coverage: experiences and lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic response in Quezon City, Philippines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1