Arne Helland, Sébastien Muller, Olav Spigset, Hege-Merete Krabseth, Miriam Hansen, Ragnhild Bergene Skråstad
{"title":"健康志愿者单次治疗剂量右安非他明、利德安非他明和哌甲酯后口服液和尿液中的药物检测。","authors":"Arne Helland, Sébastien Muller, Olav Spigset, Hege-Merete Krabseth, Miriam Hansen, Ragnhild Bergene Skråstad","doi":"10.1093/jat/bkae097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dexamphetamine, lisdexamphetamine, and methylphenidate are central stimulant drugs widely used to treat Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), but poor adherence may lead to treatment failure and the drugs are also subject to misuse and diversion. Drug analysis in oral fluid may thus be useful for monitoring adherence and misuse. We measured drug concentrations in oral fluid and urine after controlled dosing to investigate detection windows and evaluate the chosen cut-offs. Healthy volunteers ingested single oral doses of 10 mg dexamphetamine (n=11), 30 mg lisdexamphetamine (n=11), or 20 mg methylphenidate (n=10), after which they collected parallel oral fluid and urine samples every 8 hours for 4-6 days. Amphetamine (analytical cut-off, oral fluid: 1.5 ng/mL; urine: 50 ng/mL), methylphenidate (oral fluid: 0.06 ng/mL), and ritalinic acid (urine: 500 ng/mL) were analyzed using fully validated chromatographic methods. The median time from ingestion to the last detection in oral fluid was 67 ± 4.9 (lisdexamphetamine) and 69 ± 8.8 (dexamphetamine) hours for amphetamine and 36 ± 2.5 hours for methylphenidate. This was comparable to urine (77 ± 5.1 hours for lisdexamphetamine, 78 ± 4.5 hours for dexamphetamine, 41 ± 2.4 hours for ritalinic acid). The inter-individual variability in detection times was large, probably in part due to pH-dependent disposition. Using a logistic regression approach, we found similar detection rates as a function of time since intake in urine and oral fluid with the chosen cut-offs, with a high degree of probability for detection at least 24 hours after intake of a low therapeutic dose. This demonstrates the usefulness of oral fluid as a test matrix to assess adherence to ADHD medications, provided the analytical method is sensitive, requiring a cut-off as low as 0.1 ng/mL for methylphenidate. Detection windows similar to those in urine may be achieved for amphetamine and methylphenidate in oral fluid.</p>","PeriodicalId":14905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of analytical toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drug detection in oral fluid and urine after single therapeutic doses of dexamphetamine, lisdexamphetamine, and methylphenidate in healthy volunteers.\",\"authors\":\"Arne Helland, Sébastien Muller, Olav Spigset, Hege-Merete Krabseth, Miriam Hansen, Ragnhild Bergene Skråstad\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jat/bkae097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Dexamphetamine, lisdexamphetamine, and methylphenidate are central stimulant drugs widely used to treat Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), but poor adherence may lead to treatment failure and the drugs are also subject to misuse and diversion. Drug analysis in oral fluid may thus be useful for monitoring adherence and misuse. We measured drug concentrations in oral fluid and urine after controlled dosing to investigate detection windows and evaluate the chosen cut-offs. Healthy volunteers ingested single oral doses of 10 mg dexamphetamine (n=11), 30 mg lisdexamphetamine (n=11), or 20 mg methylphenidate (n=10), after which they collected parallel oral fluid and urine samples every 8 hours for 4-6 days. Amphetamine (analytical cut-off, oral fluid: 1.5 ng/mL; urine: 50 ng/mL), methylphenidate (oral fluid: 0.06 ng/mL), and ritalinic acid (urine: 500 ng/mL) were analyzed using fully validated chromatographic methods. The median time from ingestion to the last detection in oral fluid was 67 ± 4.9 (lisdexamphetamine) and 69 ± 8.8 (dexamphetamine) hours for amphetamine and 36 ± 2.5 hours for methylphenidate. This was comparable to urine (77 ± 5.1 hours for lisdexamphetamine, 78 ± 4.5 hours for dexamphetamine, 41 ± 2.4 hours for ritalinic acid). The inter-individual variability in detection times was large, probably in part due to pH-dependent disposition. Using a logistic regression approach, we found similar detection rates as a function of time since intake in urine and oral fluid with the chosen cut-offs, with a high degree of probability for detection at least 24 hours after intake of a low therapeutic dose. This demonstrates the usefulness of oral fluid as a test matrix to assess adherence to ADHD medications, provided the analytical method is sensitive, requiring a cut-off as low as 0.1 ng/mL for methylphenidate. Detection windows similar to those in urine may be achieved for amphetamine and methylphenidate in oral fluid.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of analytical toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of analytical toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkae097\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of analytical toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkae097","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Drug detection in oral fluid and urine after single therapeutic doses of dexamphetamine, lisdexamphetamine, and methylphenidate in healthy volunteers.
Dexamphetamine, lisdexamphetamine, and methylphenidate are central stimulant drugs widely used to treat Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), but poor adherence may lead to treatment failure and the drugs are also subject to misuse and diversion. Drug analysis in oral fluid may thus be useful for monitoring adherence and misuse. We measured drug concentrations in oral fluid and urine after controlled dosing to investigate detection windows and evaluate the chosen cut-offs. Healthy volunteers ingested single oral doses of 10 mg dexamphetamine (n=11), 30 mg lisdexamphetamine (n=11), or 20 mg methylphenidate (n=10), after which they collected parallel oral fluid and urine samples every 8 hours for 4-6 days. Amphetamine (analytical cut-off, oral fluid: 1.5 ng/mL; urine: 50 ng/mL), methylphenidate (oral fluid: 0.06 ng/mL), and ritalinic acid (urine: 500 ng/mL) were analyzed using fully validated chromatographic methods. The median time from ingestion to the last detection in oral fluid was 67 ± 4.9 (lisdexamphetamine) and 69 ± 8.8 (dexamphetamine) hours for amphetamine and 36 ± 2.5 hours for methylphenidate. This was comparable to urine (77 ± 5.1 hours for lisdexamphetamine, 78 ± 4.5 hours for dexamphetamine, 41 ± 2.4 hours for ritalinic acid). The inter-individual variability in detection times was large, probably in part due to pH-dependent disposition. Using a logistic regression approach, we found similar detection rates as a function of time since intake in urine and oral fluid with the chosen cut-offs, with a high degree of probability for detection at least 24 hours after intake of a low therapeutic dose. This demonstrates the usefulness of oral fluid as a test matrix to assess adherence to ADHD medications, provided the analytical method is sensitive, requiring a cut-off as low as 0.1 ng/mL for methylphenidate. Detection windows similar to those in urine may be achieved for amphetamine and methylphenidate in oral fluid.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Analytical Toxicology (JAT) is an international toxicology journal devoted to the timely dissemination of scientific communications concerning potentially toxic substances and drug identification, isolation, and quantitation.
Since its inception in 1977, the Journal of Analytical Toxicology has striven to present state-of-the-art techniques used in toxicology labs. The peer-review process provided by the distinguished members of the Editorial Advisory Board ensures the high-quality and integrity of articles published in the Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Timely presentation of the latest toxicology developments is ensured through Technical Notes, Case Reports, and Letters to the Editor.