卡立哌嗪对复方口服避孕药药代动力学的影响缺乏临床意义。

IF 3.9 3区医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurology and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1007/s40120-024-00686-7

Márta Erzsébet Rosa, Zoltán Juhász, Gabriella Pásztor Mészáros, Gabriella Magyar, Judit Harsányi, Balázs Szatmári, Zoltán Hujber, Máté Szabó, Margit Kapás

{"title":"卡立哌嗪对复方口服避孕药药代动力学的影响缺乏临床意义。","authors":"Márta Erzsébet Rosa, Zoltán Juhász, Gabriella Pásztor Mészáros, Gabriella Magyar, Judit Harsányi, Balázs Szatmári, Zoltán Hujber, Máté Szabó, Margit Kapás","doi":"10.1007/s40120-024-00686-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Cariprazine (CAR) is a potent dopamine receptor partial agonist antipsychotic approved by the EMA and the FDA. To address the uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of hormonal contraceptives during CAR co-administration and whether a second barrier method is necessary, a drug-drug interaction study with an oral contraceptive was conducted post-approval.Methods: The phase I, fixed-sequence multicenter study involved two periods with 24 patients with schizophrenia, aiming to evaluate the effect of CAR on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing 30 μg ethinylestradiol (EE) and 150 μg levonorgestrel (LNG). In period A, a single dose of COC alone was administered on day 1. In period B, the highest therapeutic dose of 6 mg CAR was administered once daily from day 4, and a second dose of COC was given concomitantly on day 31.Results: Overall, CAR had no clinically meaningful effect on the PK of the COC. The terminal half-life and the time of maximum plasma concentration of EE and LNG were not altered by CAR co-administration. The highest difference observed was a decrease of 14% in the maximum plasma concentration of EE, with only slight deviation of the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the test/reference ratio (77.09-96.81) from the generally accepted bioequivalence range of 80-125%, which is not considered clinically relevant. Confidence intervals of all other exposure measures were within the 80-125% range for both EE and LNG.Conclusions: According to these results, hormonal contraceptives can be considered effective during CAR treatment.Trial registration: Trial registration number (EudraCT) 2018-003722-80.","PeriodicalId":19216,"journal":{"name":"Neurology and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"291-301"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11762025/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lack of Clinically Meaningful Effect of Cariprazine on the Pharmacokinetics of a Combined Oral Contraceptive.\",\"authors\":\"Márta Erzsébet Rosa, Zoltán Juhász, Gabriella Pásztor Mészáros, Gabriella Magyar, Judit Harsányi, Balázs Szatmári, Zoltán Hujber, Máté Szabó, Margit Kapás\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40120-024-00686-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Cariprazine (CAR) is a potent dopamine receptor partial agonist antipsychotic approved by the EMA and the FDA. To address the uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of hormonal contraceptives during CAR co-administration and whether a second barrier method is necessary, a drug-drug interaction study with an oral contraceptive was conducted post-approval.Methods: The phase I, fixed-sequence multicenter study involved two periods with 24 patients with schizophrenia, aiming to evaluate the effect of CAR on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing 30 μg ethinylestradiol (EE) and 150 μg levonorgestrel (LNG). In period A, a single dose of COC alone was administered on day 1. In period B, the highest therapeutic dose of 6 mg CAR was administered once daily from day 4, and a second dose of COC was given concomitantly on day 31.Results: Overall, CAR had no clinically meaningful effect on the PK of the COC. The terminal half-life and the time of maximum plasma concentration of EE and LNG were not altered by CAR co-administration. The highest difference observed was a decrease of 14% in the maximum plasma concentration of EE, with only slight deviation of the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the test/reference ratio (77.09-96.81) from the generally accepted bioequivalence range of 80-125%, which is not considered clinically relevant. Confidence intervals of all other exposure measures were within the 80-125% range for both EE and LNG.Conclusions: According to these results, hormonal contraceptives can be considered effective during CAR treatment.Trial registration: Trial registration number (EudraCT) 2018-003722-80.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology and Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"291-301\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11762025/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-024-00686-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-024-00686-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

Cariprazine （CAR）是EMA和FDA批准的一种有效的多巴胺受体部分激动剂抗精神病药物。为了解决在CAR联合给药期间激素避孕药有效性的不确定性以及是否需要第二屏障方法，在批准后进行了口服避孕药的药物-药物相互作用研究。方法：采用固定顺序的I期多中心研究，纳入2期24例精神分裂症患者，目的是评估CAR对含有30 μg炔雌醇（EE）和150 μg左炔诺孕酮（LNG）的复方口服避孕药（COC）药代动力学（PK）的影响。在A期，在第1天单独给药单剂量COC。在B期，从第4天开始给予最高治疗剂量6mg CAR，每天一次，第31天同时给予第二剂量COC。结果：总体而言，CAR对COC的PK无临床意义的影响。CAR联合给药后，EE和LNG的终末半衰期和最大血浆浓度时间未发生变化。观察到的最大差异是EE的最大血浆浓度下降了14%，试验/参考比（77.09-96.81）的90%置信区间（CI）与普遍接受的80-125%的生物等效性范围只有轻微偏差，这被认为与临床无关。对于EE和LNG，所有其他暴露测量的置信区间均在80-125%范围内。结论：根据这些结果，激素避孕药在CAR治疗中可以被认为是有效的。试验注册：试验注册号（edract） 2018-003722-80。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Lack of Clinically Meaningful Effect of Cariprazine on the Pharmacokinetics of a Combined Oral Contraceptive.

Introduction: Cariprazine (CAR) is a potent dopamine receptor partial agonist antipsychotic approved by the EMA and the FDA. To address the uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of hormonal contraceptives during CAR co-administration and whether a second barrier method is necessary, a drug-drug interaction study with an oral contraceptive was conducted post-approval.

Methods: The phase I, fixed-sequence multicenter study involved two periods with 24 patients with schizophrenia, aiming to evaluate the effect of CAR on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing 30 μg ethinylestradiol (EE) and 150 μg levonorgestrel (LNG). In period A, a single dose of COC alone was administered on day 1. In period B, the highest therapeutic dose of 6 mg CAR was administered once daily from day 4, and a second dose of COC was given concomitantly on day 31.

Results: Overall, CAR had no clinically meaningful effect on the PK of the COC. The terminal half-life and the time of maximum plasma concentration of EE and LNG were not altered by CAR co-administration. The highest difference observed was a decrease of 14% in the maximum plasma concentration of EE, with only slight deviation of the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the test/reference ratio (77.09-96.81) from the generally accepted bioequivalence range of 80-125%, which is not considered clinically relevant. Confidence intervals of all other exposure measures were within the 80-125% range for both EE and LNG.

Conclusions: According to these results, hormonal contraceptives can be considered effective during CAR treatment.

Trial registration: Trial registration number (EudraCT) 2018-003722-80.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Neurology and Therapy CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-

CiteScore

5.40

自引率

8.10%

发文量

103

审稿时长

6 weeks

期刊介绍： Aims and Scope Neurology and Therapy aims to provide reliable and inclusive, rapid publication for all therapy related research for neurological indications, supporting the timely dissemination of research with a global reach, to help advance scientific discovery and support clinical practice. Neurology and Therapy is an international, open access, peer reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of neurological and psychiatric therapies, (also covering surgery and devices). Studies relating to diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also welcomed. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports, trial designs, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Neurology and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research. Rapid Publication The journal’s rapid publication timelines aim for a peer review decision within 2 weeks of submission. If an article is accepted, it will be published online 3-4 weeks from acceptance. These rapid timelines are achieved through the combination of a dedicated in-house editorial team, who closely manage article workflow, and an extensive Editorial and Advisory Board who assist with rapid peer review. This allows the journal to support the rapid dissemination of research, whilst still providing robust peer review. Combined with the journal’s open access model, this allows for the rapid and efficient communication of the latest research and reviews to support scientific discovery and clinical practice. Open Access All articles published by Neurology and Therapy are open access. Personal Service The journal’s dedicated in-house editorial team offer a personal “concierge service” meaning that authors will always have a personal point of contact able to update them on the status of their manuscript. The editorial team check all manuscripts to ensure that articles conform to the most recent COPE and ICMJE publishing guidelines. This supports the publication of ethically sound and transparent research. We also encourage pre-submission enquiries and are always happy to provide a confidential assessment of manuscripts. Digital Features and Plain Language Summaries Neurology and Therapy offers a range of additional features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by key summary points, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand the scientific content and overall implications of the article. The journal also provides the option to include various types of digital features including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations. All additional features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. If you consider that your paper would benefit from the inclusion of a digital feature, please let us know. Our editorial team are able to create high-quality slide decks and infographics in-house, and video abstracts through our partner Research Square, and would be happy to assist in any way we can. For further information about digital features, please contact the journal editor (see ‘Contact the Journal’ for email address), and see the ‘Guidelines for digital features and plain language summaries’ document under ‘Submission guidelines’. For examples of digital features please visit our showcase page https://springerhealthcare.com/expertise/publishing-digital-features/ Publication Fees Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be required to pay the mandatory Rapid Service Fee of €5250/$6000/£4300. The journal will consider fee discounts and waivers for developing countries and this is decided on a case-by-case basis. Peer Review Process Upon submission, manuscripts are assessed by the editorial team to ensure they fit within the aims and scope of the journal and are also checked for plagiarism. All suitable submissions are then subject to a comprehensive single-blind peer review. Reviewers are selected based on their relevant expertise and publication history in the subject area. The journal has an extensive pool of editorial and advisory board members who have been selected to assist with peer review based on the afore-mentioned criteria. At least two extensive reviews are required to make the editorial decision, with the exception of some article types such as Commentaries, Editorials and Letters which are generally reviewed by one member of the Editorial Board. Where reviews conflict, an Editorial Board Member will be contacted for further advice and a presiding decision. Manuscripts are then either accepted, rejected or authors are required to make major or minor revisions (both reviewer comments and editorial comments may need to be addressed. Once a revised manuscript is re-submitted, it is assessed along with the responses to reviewer comments and if it has been adequately revised, it will be accepted for publication. Accepted manuscripts are then copyedited and typeset by the production team before online publication. Appeals against decisions following peer review are considered on a case-by-case basis and should be sent to the journal editor, and authors are welcome to make rebuttals against individual reviewer comments, if appropriate. Preprints We encourage posting of preprints of primary research manuscripts on preprint servers, authors'' or institutional websites, and open communications between researchers whether on community preprint servers or preprint commenting platforms. Posting of preprints is not considered prior publication and will not jeopardize consideration in our journals. Please see here for further information on preprint sharing: https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/journal-author/journal-author-helpdesk/submission/1302#c16721550 Copyright Neurology and Therapy is published under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, which allows users to read, copy, distribute, and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited. The author assigns the exclusive right to any commercial use of the article to Springer. For more information about the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, click here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0. Contact For more information about the journal, including pre-submission enquiries, please contact managing editor Lydia Alborn at lydia.alborn@springer.com.