孟加拉国对紧急避孕药的认识:错过了产前保健和家庭福利助理访问的机会。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Reproductive Health Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1186/s12978-024-01922-x
Tasnim Ara, Shahnaj Sultana Sathi, Shafayatul Islam Shiblee, Sumaiya Nusrat Esha, Md Tazvir Amin, Md Mahabubur Rahman
{"title":"孟加拉国对紧急避孕药的认识:错过了产前保健和家庭福利助理访问的机会。","authors":"Tasnim Ara, Shahnaj Sultana Sathi, Shafayatul Islam Shiblee, Sumaiya Nusrat Esha, Md Tazvir Amin, Md Mahabubur Rahman","doi":"10.1186/s12978-024-01922-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite high coverage of antenatal care (ANC) and family welfare assistant (FWA) visits, emergency contraceptive pill (ECP) awareness is critically low in Bangladesh. We aim to investigate the missed opportunities in generating ECP awareness through ANC and FWA visit programs; and assess the missed opportunities and sociodemographic discrimination in receiving family planning (FP) counseling during ANC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the nationwide Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2017-18. Sample includes 5012 reproductive-aged women who gave live birth in the last 3 years preceding the survey. We used mixed-effect multiple logistic regression considering women nested within clusters to conclude.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nationally, 79% of women who gave live birth in the last 3 years preceding the survey were unaware of ECP. The estimated missed opportunities in generating ECP awareness was 59.5% in ANC, 0.9% in FWA visits, and 12.3% in both ANC and FWA visits. While FWA visit was not associated with ECP awareness, receiving FP counseling during ANC was significantly associated. About 88.4% of women remained unexposed to FP counseling through ANC during their last pregnancy. Missed opportunities in FP counseling during ANC was 80.4% of which 72% points were from qualified providers. The odds of missed opportunities was not associated with provider type, rather significantly increased among women with low education, lower parity, and poor socioeconomic status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the fragile status of FP counseling during ANC and FWA visits in generating ECP awareness. A prominent provider bias is excluding women of the disadvantageous sociodemographic group from receiving FP counseling.</p>","PeriodicalId":20899,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health","volume":"21 1","pages":"186"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11657555/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency contraceptive pill awareness in Bangladesh: missed opportunities in antenatal care and family welfare assistant visits.\",\"authors\":\"Tasnim Ara, Shahnaj Sultana Sathi, Shafayatul Islam Shiblee, Sumaiya Nusrat Esha, Md Tazvir Amin, Md Mahabubur Rahman\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12978-024-01922-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite high coverage of antenatal care (ANC) and family welfare assistant (FWA) visits, emergency contraceptive pill (ECP) awareness is critically low in Bangladesh. We aim to investigate the missed opportunities in generating ECP awareness through ANC and FWA visit programs; and assess the missed opportunities and sociodemographic discrimination in receiving family planning (FP) counseling during ANC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the nationwide Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2017-18. Sample includes 5012 reproductive-aged women who gave live birth in the last 3 years preceding the survey. We used mixed-effect multiple logistic regression considering women nested within clusters to conclude.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nationally, 79% of women who gave live birth in the last 3 years preceding the survey were unaware of ECP. The estimated missed opportunities in generating ECP awareness was 59.5% in ANC, 0.9% in FWA visits, and 12.3% in both ANC and FWA visits. While FWA visit was not associated with ECP awareness, receiving FP counseling during ANC was significantly associated. About 88.4% of women remained unexposed to FP counseling through ANC during their last pregnancy. Missed opportunities in FP counseling during ANC was 80.4% of which 72% points were from qualified providers. The odds of missed opportunities was not associated with provider type, rather significantly increased among women with low education, lower parity, and poor socioeconomic status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the fragile status of FP counseling during ANC and FWA visits in generating ECP awareness. A prominent provider bias is excluding women of the disadvantageous sociodemographic group from receiving FP counseling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive Health\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11657555/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-024-01922-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-024-01922-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管产前保健(ANC)和家庭福利助理(FWA)访问的覆盖率很高,但孟加拉国对紧急避孕药(ECP)的认识非常低。我们的目标是调查在通过ANC和FWA访问计划提高ECP意识方面错过的机会;并评估在ANC期间接受计划生育(FP)咨询的错失机会和社会人口歧视。方法:我们使用了2017-18年孟加拉国全国人口与健康调查的数据。样本包括5012名在调查前3年内活产的育龄妇女。我们使用混合效应多元逻辑回归考虑女性嵌套在集群中得出结论。结果:在全国范围内,在调查前3年内活产的妇女中有79%不知道ECP。据估计,ANC患者在产生ECP意识方面的错失机会为59.5%,FWA患者为0.9%,ANC和FWA患者均为12.3%。虽然FWA访问与ECP意识无关,但在ANC期间接受FP咨询显着相关。约88.4%的妇女在最后一次怀孕期间没有通过ANC接受计划生育咨询。ANC期间计划生育咨询的错失率为80.4%,其中72%来自合格的提供者。错失机会的几率与提供者类型无关,在受教育程度低、平等程度低和社会经济地位差的妇女中,错失机会的几率显著增加。结论:本研究强调了在ANC和FWA访问期间,计划生育咨询在产生ECP意识方面的脆弱地位。一个突出的提供者偏见是排除弱势社会人口群体的妇女接受计划生育咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Emergency contraceptive pill awareness in Bangladesh: missed opportunities in antenatal care and family welfare assistant visits.

Background: Despite high coverage of antenatal care (ANC) and family welfare assistant (FWA) visits, emergency contraceptive pill (ECP) awareness is critically low in Bangladesh. We aim to investigate the missed opportunities in generating ECP awareness through ANC and FWA visit programs; and assess the missed opportunities and sociodemographic discrimination in receiving family planning (FP) counseling during ANC.

Methods: We used data from the nationwide Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2017-18. Sample includes 5012 reproductive-aged women who gave live birth in the last 3 years preceding the survey. We used mixed-effect multiple logistic regression considering women nested within clusters to conclude.

Results: Nationally, 79% of women who gave live birth in the last 3 years preceding the survey were unaware of ECP. The estimated missed opportunities in generating ECP awareness was 59.5% in ANC, 0.9% in FWA visits, and 12.3% in both ANC and FWA visits. While FWA visit was not associated with ECP awareness, receiving FP counseling during ANC was significantly associated. About 88.4% of women remained unexposed to FP counseling through ANC during their last pregnancy. Missed opportunities in FP counseling during ANC was 80.4% of which 72% points were from qualified providers. The odds of missed opportunities was not associated with provider type, rather significantly increased among women with low education, lower parity, and poor socioeconomic status.

Conclusions: This study highlights the fragile status of FP counseling during ANC and FWA visits in generating ECP awareness. A prominent provider bias is excluding women of the disadvantageous sociodemographic group from receiving FP counseling.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive Health
Reproductive Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
220
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Health focuses on all aspects of human reproduction. The journal includes sections dedicated to adolescent health, female fertility and midwifery and all content is open access. Reproductive health is defined as a state of physical, mental, and social well-being in all matters relating to the reproductive system, at all stages of life. Good reproductive health implies that people are able to have a satisfying and safe sex life, the capability to reproduce and the freedom to decide if, when, and how often to do so. Men and women should be informed about and have access to safe, effective, affordable, and acceptable methods of family planning of their choice, and the right to appropriate health-care services that enable women to safely go through pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
Correlations among hope, fertility quality of life and negative emotions for couples undergoing their first in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a cross-sectional analysis. Trends and contributors of complete continuum of maternal healthcare service utilization in Ethiopia: a multivariate decomposition analyses. Designing and validating an adaptation tool for endometriosis: an exploratory mixed method study protocol. Infertility stigma and openness with others are related to depressive symptoms and meaning in life in men and women diagnosed with infertility. Fear of childbirth and psychiatric disorders decrease the likelihood of subsequent births: a retrospective register-based cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1