黑人家庭在新生儿重症监护病房的需求和经验。

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1542/peds.2024-067473
Devlynne S Ondusko, Susanne Klawetter, Emily Hawkins Carter, Morinne Osborne, Jaime W Peterson, Veronica I Underwood Carrasco, Astrid Platteau, Roberta Suzette Hunte
{"title":"黑人家庭在新生儿重症监护病房的需求和经验。","authors":"Devlynne S Ondusko, Susanne Klawetter, Emily Hawkins Carter, Morinne Osborne, Jaime W Peterson, Veronica I Underwood Carrasco, Astrid Platteau, Roberta Suzette Hunte","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-067473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p></p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify opportunities for improvement in quality of care, we explore Black families' experiences of family support in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) during their infant's hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semistructured qualitative interviews or focus groups (FGs) were conducted to explore Black families' experiences of NICU hospitalization. Inclusion criteria were self-identification as a Black family member and infant admission to our NICU between January 2020 and February 2022. We conducted reflexive thematic analysis of recorded transcripts using Dedoose software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three interviews and 2 FGs were conducted with 9 unique families (n = 13 individuals). We organized 10 key themes into \"Experiences\" and \"Recommendations.\" Experience themes included distrust and fear of the medical setting, hypervigilance and trauma trajectory formation, the myth of \"Black hardiness,\" policing and surveillance, and undermining of Black parenting. Recommendation themes implored NICU staff to earn rather than assume trust, respect family concerns, improve mental health support, provide compassionate care, and support the parenting role.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this single-center qualitative study of Black families' NICU encounters, families continue to experience differential treatment, which reinforces an untrustworthy medical system perpetuating structural racism. Family recommendations for improving care through transparent communication, advocacy and mental health support, increased engagement in their parental role, and decreasing biased treatment and provision of resources may improve their experience and mitigate hypervigilance and trajectory formation in our NICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Needs and Experiences of Black Families in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.\",\"authors\":\"Devlynne S Ondusko, Susanne Klawetter, Emily Hawkins Carter, Morinne Osborne, Jaime W Peterson, Veronica I Underwood Carrasco, Astrid Platteau, Roberta Suzette Hunte\",\"doi\":\"10.1542/peds.2024-067473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p></p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify opportunities for improvement in quality of care, we explore Black families' experiences of family support in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) during their infant's hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semistructured qualitative interviews or focus groups (FGs) were conducted to explore Black families' experiences of NICU hospitalization. Inclusion criteria were self-identification as a Black family member and infant admission to our NICU between January 2020 and February 2022. We conducted reflexive thematic analysis of recorded transcripts using Dedoose software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three interviews and 2 FGs were conducted with 9 unique families (n = 13 individuals). We organized 10 key themes into \\\"Experiences\\\" and \\\"Recommendations.\\\" Experience themes included distrust and fear of the medical setting, hypervigilance and trauma trajectory formation, the myth of \\\"Black hardiness,\\\" policing and surveillance, and undermining of Black parenting. Recommendation themes implored NICU staff to earn rather than assume trust, respect family concerns, improve mental health support, provide compassionate care, and support the parenting role.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this single-center qualitative study of Black families' NICU encounters, families continue to experience differential treatment, which reinforces an untrustworthy medical system perpetuating structural racism. Family recommendations for improving care through transparent communication, advocacy and mental health support, increased engagement in their parental role, and decreasing biased treatment and provision of resources may improve their experience and mitigate hypervigilance and trajectory formation in our NICU.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-067473\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-067473","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:为了确定提高护理质量的机会,我们探讨了黑人家庭在新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)期间的家庭支持经验。方法:采用半结构化定性访谈或焦点小组(FGs)探讨黑人家庭在新生儿重症监护病房的住院经历。纳入标准为自我认同为黑人家庭成员,并于2020年1月至2022年2月期间入住NICU的婴儿。我们使用Dedoose软件对记录的转录本进行反身性专题分析。结果:对9个独特的家庭(n = 13个人)进行了3次访谈和2次fg。我们将10个关键主题分为“体验”和“建议”。体验主题包括对医疗环境的不信任和恐惧,过度警惕和创伤轨迹的形成,“黑人坚韧不拔”的神话,警察和监视,以及对黑人教育的破坏。建议主题恳求新生儿重症监护室工作人员赢得而不是承担信任,尊重家庭关切,改善心理健康支持,提供富有同情心的护理,并支持父母的角色。结论:在这项黑人家庭新生儿重症监护病房遭遇的单中心定性研究中,家庭继续经历差别待遇,这加强了一个不值得信赖的医疗系统,使结构性种族主义得以延续。家庭建议通过透明的沟通、宣传和心理健康支持来改善护理,增加父母角色的参与,减少有偏见的治疗和提供资源,可以改善他们的经验,减轻我们新生儿重症监护室的过度警惕和轨迹形成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Needs and Experiences of Black Families in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Objectives: To identify opportunities for improvement in quality of care, we explore Black families' experiences of family support in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) during their infant's hospital stay.

Methods: Semistructured qualitative interviews or focus groups (FGs) were conducted to explore Black families' experiences of NICU hospitalization. Inclusion criteria were self-identification as a Black family member and infant admission to our NICU between January 2020 and February 2022. We conducted reflexive thematic analysis of recorded transcripts using Dedoose software.

Results: Three interviews and 2 FGs were conducted with 9 unique families (n = 13 individuals). We organized 10 key themes into "Experiences" and "Recommendations." Experience themes included distrust and fear of the medical setting, hypervigilance and trauma trajectory formation, the myth of "Black hardiness," policing and surveillance, and undermining of Black parenting. Recommendation themes implored NICU staff to earn rather than assume trust, respect family concerns, improve mental health support, provide compassionate care, and support the parenting role.

Conclusions: In this single-center qualitative study of Black families' NICU encounters, families continue to experience differential treatment, which reinforces an untrustworthy medical system perpetuating structural racism. Family recommendations for improving care through transparent communication, advocacy and mental health support, increased engagement in their parental role, and decreasing biased treatment and provision of resources may improve their experience and mitigate hypervigilance and trajectory formation in our NICU.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatrics
Pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
791
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field. The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability. Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights. As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.
期刊最新文献
ADHD Prescription Patterns: Paying Attention to Trends. Prescription Stimulant Dispensing to US Children: 2017-2023. Academic Achievement of Children With Neurofibromatosis Type 1. October 2024 ACIP Meeting Update: Influenza, COVID-19, RSV and Other Vaccines. Late-Onset Sepsis Among Extremely Preterm Infants During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1