一个个性化定制的复杂干预的过程评估,以改善老年养老院居民的活动和参与关节挛缩(JointConEval):一项混合方法的研究。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Trials Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08652-2
Regina Thalhammer, Natalie Nguyen, Gabriele Meyer, Stefanie Skudlik, Martin Müller, Katrin Beutner
{"title":"一个个性化定制的复杂干预的过程评估,以改善老年养老院居民的活动和参与关节挛缩(JointConEval):一项混合方法的研究。","authors":"Regina Thalhammer, Natalie Nguyen, Gabriele Meyer, Stefanie Skudlik, Martin Müller, Katrin Beutner","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08652-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older people with joint contractures in nursing homes often experience severe restrictions in their activities and participation. The effectiveness of an individually tailored complex intervention to improve residents' activities and participation by incorporating the biopsychosocial perspective into nursing care using a structured facilitator approach could not be established in the JointConEval cluster-randomised controlled trial. This process evaluation aimed to systematically identify factors influencing implementation and effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The mixed-methods process evaluation analysed recruitment, implementation, mechanisms of impact, and context. Qualitative data was generated in semi-structured focus groups and in individual interviews with facilitators, nursing and social care staff, residents, relatives and guardians. Quantitative data was recorded with facilitators and 20% of nursing and social care staff using standardised documentation forms and questionnaires. Qualitative data was analysed using qualitative thematic content analysis, while the quantitative data was analysed descriptively. An interpretation was performed by combining and comparing the qualitative and quantitative results after the separate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The implementation was realised as planned, but the intervention did not always reach the nursing home staff, which hindered the planned change in attitude and behaviour. The attitude of the facilitators was mainly in line with the intervention. However, the intervention reached only half the residents. We identified various key influencing factors related to the context, setting and implementation agents. Nursing homes lacking facilitator support from staff or management or experiencing staff shortages and facing organisational weaknesses had difficulties in achieving the desired behavioural changes and positive primary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The complex intervention was delivered as planned with several factors affecting the implementation. A key influencing factor was the organisational structure and leadership of the nursing homes, which had an impact on the behaviour and motivation of the implementation agents. The findings highlight challenges in achieving behavioural changes among nursing staff in the context of long-term care in Germany. We recommend a systematic organisational context analysis for similar complex interventions in long-term care, involving stakeholders and improving leadership participation for more effective implementation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>DRKS (German Clinical Trials Register), number DRKS00015185. Registered on 1 August 2018, https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00015185 . Universal Trial Number U1111-1218-1555.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"25 1","pages":"831"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11654093/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Process evaluation of an individually tailored complex intervention to improve activities and participation of older nursing home residents with joint contractures (JointConEval): a mixed-methods study.\",\"authors\":\"Regina Thalhammer, Natalie Nguyen, Gabriele Meyer, Stefanie Skudlik, Martin Müller, Katrin Beutner\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13063-024-08652-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older people with joint contractures in nursing homes often experience severe restrictions in their activities and participation. The effectiveness of an individually tailored complex intervention to improve residents' activities and participation by incorporating the biopsychosocial perspective into nursing care using a structured facilitator approach could not be established in the JointConEval cluster-randomised controlled trial. This process evaluation aimed to systematically identify factors influencing implementation and effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The mixed-methods process evaluation analysed recruitment, implementation, mechanisms of impact, and context. Qualitative data was generated in semi-structured focus groups and in individual interviews with facilitators, nursing and social care staff, residents, relatives and guardians. Quantitative data was recorded with facilitators and 20% of nursing and social care staff using standardised documentation forms and questionnaires. Qualitative data was analysed using qualitative thematic content analysis, while the quantitative data was analysed descriptively. An interpretation was performed by combining and comparing the qualitative and quantitative results after the separate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The implementation was realised as planned, but the intervention did not always reach the nursing home staff, which hindered the planned change in attitude and behaviour. The attitude of the facilitators was mainly in line with the intervention. However, the intervention reached only half the residents. We identified various key influencing factors related to the context, setting and implementation agents. Nursing homes lacking facilitator support from staff or management or experiencing staff shortages and facing organisational weaknesses had difficulties in achieving the desired behavioural changes and positive primary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The complex intervention was delivered as planned with several factors affecting the implementation. A key influencing factor was the organisational structure and leadership of the nursing homes, which had an impact on the behaviour and motivation of the implementation agents. The findings highlight challenges in achieving behavioural changes among nursing staff in the context of long-term care in Germany. We recommend a systematic organisational context analysis for similar complex interventions in long-term care, involving stakeholders and improving leadership participation for more effective implementation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>DRKS (German Clinical Trials Register), number DRKS00015185. Registered on 1 August 2018, https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00015185 . Universal Trial Number U1111-1218-1555.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trials\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"831\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11654093/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08652-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08652-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在养老院中患有关节挛缩的老年人通常在活动和参与方面受到严重限制。在JointConEval集群随机对照试验中,无法确定通过使用结构化促进者方法将生物心理社会视角纳入护理来改善居民活动和参与的个性化定制复杂干预措施的有效性。该过程评价旨在系统地识别影响实施和有效性的因素。方法:采用混合方法对招聘、实施、影响机制和背景进行分析。定性数据是在半结构化焦点小组和与协调员、护理和社会护理人员、居民、亲属和监护人的个别访谈中产生的。使用标准化文件表格和问卷,由辅助人员和20%的护理和社会护理人员记录定量数据。定性数据采用定性专题内容分析,定量数据采用描述性分析。分别分析后,将定性和定量结果结合比较,进行解释。结果:干预的实施是按计划进行的,但干预并不总是到达养老院的工作人员,这阻碍了计划的态度和行为的改变。辅导员的态度与干预程度基本一致。然而,干预措施只惠及了一半的居民。我们确定了与环境、环境和执行机构有关的各种关键影响因素。养老院缺乏工作人员或管理人员的协助,或遇到人员短缺和面临组织弱点,难以实现预期的行为改变和积极的初步结果。结论:复杂的干预措施按计划实施,但影响实施的因素较多。一个关键的影响因素是养老院的组织结构和领导,这对执行人员的行为和动机有影响。研究结果突出了在德国长期护理背景下实现护理人员行为改变的挑战。我们建议对长期护理中类似的复杂干预措施进行系统的组织背景分析,包括利益相关者和改善领导参与,以更有效地实施。试验注册:DRKS(德国临床试验注册),编号DRKS00015185。2018年8月1日注册,网址:https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00015185。通用试验号U1111-1218-1555。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Process evaluation of an individually tailored complex intervention to improve activities and participation of older nursing home residents with joint contractures (JointConEval): a mixed-methods study.

Background: Older people with joint contractures in nursing homes often experience severe restrictions in their activities and participation. The effectiveness of an individually tailored complex intervention to improve residents' activities and participation by incorporating the biopsychosocial perspective into nursing care using a structured facilitator approach could not be established in the JointConEval cluster-randomised controlled trial. This process evaluation aimed to systematically identify factors influencing implementation and effectiveness.

Methods: The mixed-methods process evaluation analysed recruitment, implementation, mechanisms of impact, and context. Qualitative data was generated in semi-structured focus groups and in individual interviews with facilitators, nursing and social care staff, residents, relatives and guardians. Quantitative data was recorded with facilitators and 20% of nursing and social care staff using standardised documentation forms and questionnaires. Qualitative data was analysed using qualitative thematic content analysis, while the quantitative data was analysed descriptively. An interpretation was performed by combining and comparing the qualitative and quantitative results after the separate analyses.

Results: The implementation was realised as planned, but the intervention did not always reach the nursing home staff, which hindered the planned change in attitude and behaviour. The attitude of the facilitators was mainly in line with the intervention. However, the intervention reached only half the residents. We identified various key influencing factors related to the context, setting and implementation agents. Nursing homes lacking facilitator support from staff or management or experiencing staff shortages and facing organisational weaknesses had difficulties in achieving the desired behavioural changes and positive primary outcomes.

Conclusions: The complex intervention was delivered as planned with several factors affecting the implementation. A key influencing factor was the organisational structure and leadership of the nursing homes, which had an impact on the behaviour and motivation of the implementation agents. The findings highlight challenges in achieving behavioural changes among nursing staff in the context of long-term care in Germany. We recommend a systematic organisational context analysis for similar complex interventions in long-term care, involving stakeholders and improving leadership participation for more effective implementation.

Trial registration: DRKS (German Clinical Trials Register), number DRKS00015185. Registered on 1 August 2018, https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00015185 . Universal Trial Number U1111-1218-1555.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing vaccine clinical trials participation among elderly: challenges and strategies. How to improve the quality of euglycemic glucose clamp tests in long-acting insulin studies. Assessing the effectiveness and the feasibility of a group-based treatment for self-stigma in people with mental disorders in routine mental health services in North-East Italy: study protocol for a pragmatic multisite randomized controlled trial. Distribution of trial registry numbers within full-text of PubMed Central articles: implications for linking trials to publications and indexing trial publication types. The impact of vitamin E supplementation on sperm analysis in varicocelectomy patients: a triple-blind randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1