英语和西班牙语助听器相关网站的质量和可读性。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of the American Academy of Audiology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1791215
Abbigayle Willgruber, Brian Kinealy, David Adkins, Marissa Schuh, Jennifer B Shinn, Trey A Cline, Ryleigh Board, Zain Hassan, Matthew Bush
{"title":"英语和西班牙语助听器相关网站的质量和可读性。","authors":"Abbigayle Willgruber, Brian Kinealy, David Adkins, Marissa Schuh, Jennifer B Shinn, Trey A Cline, Ryleigh Board, Zain Hassan, Matthew Bush","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1791215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> To determine the readability and quality of both English and Spanish Web sites for the topic of hearing aids.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> Cross-sectional Web site analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong> Various online search engines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> The term \"hearing aid\" was queried across four popular search engines. The first resulted 75 English Web sites and first resulted 75 Spanish Web sites were extracted for data collection. Web sites that met the inclusion criteria were stratified by the presence of a Health on the Net Code (HONCode) certificate. Articles were then compiled to be independently reviewed by experts on hearing aids, using the DISCERN criteria, which allowed assessment of the quality of the Web sites. Readability was assessed by calculating the Flesch Reading Ease Score in English and the Fernandez Huerta Formula in Spanish. Readability and quality were both analyzed, comparing scores to their respective language and cross-comparing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> There were 37 English Web sites and 30 Spanish Web sites that met inclusion criteria. When analyzing readability, English Web sites were determined to be significantly more difficult to read (average = 55.37, standard deviation [SD] = 7.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 52.9-57.9) than the Spanish Web site counterparts (average = 58.64, SD = 5.26, 95% CI = 56.8-60.5, <i>p</i> = 0.035). For quality, Spanish Web sites (average = 38, SD = 9.7, 95% CI = 34.5-41.5) were determined to be of significantly higher quality than English Web sites (average = 32.16, SD = 10.60, 95% CI = 29.7-34.6). Additionally, there was a significant difference between the non-HONCode English Web sites versus the non-HONCode Spanish Web sites (<i>p</i> = 0.0081), signifying that Spanish non-HONCode certified Web sites were less reliable than non-HONCode certified English Web sites.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong> The present study highlights the importance and necessity of providing quality, readable materials to patients seeking information regarding hearing aids. This study shows that both English and Spanish Web sites are written at a level that is much higher than the American Medical Association (AMA)-recommended sixth-grade reading level, and no Web site included in this study fell at or below the AMA-recommended sixth-grade reading level. English and Spanish Web sites also lacked consistency and quality, as evidenced by their wide variability in DISCERN scores. Specifically, Hispanic patients are more likely to suffer long-term consequences of their health care due to low levels of health literacy. It is important to bridge this gap by providing adequate reading materials. It is especially important to provide evidence-based claims that are directly supported by experts in the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":50021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"226-233"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality and Readability of Hearing Aid-Related Websites in English and Spanish.\",\"authors\":\"Abbigayle Willgruber, Brian Kinealy, David Adkins, Marissa Schuh, Jennifer B Shinn, Trey A Cline, Ryleigh Board, Zain Hassan, Matthew Bush\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1791215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> To determine the readability and quality of both English and Spanish Web sites for the topic of hearing aids.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> Cross-sectional Web site analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong> Various online search engines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> The term \\\"hearing aid\\\" was queried across four popular search engines. The first resulted 75 English Web sites and first resulted 75 Spanish Web sites were extracted for data collection. Web sites that met the inclusion criteria were stratified by the presence of a Health on the Net Code (HONCode) certificate. Articles were then compiled to be independently reviewed by experts on hearing aids, using the DISCERN criteria, which allowed assessment of the quality of the Web sites. Readability was assessed by calculating the Flesch Reading Ease Score in English and the Fernandez Huerta Formula in Spanish. Readability and quality were both analyzed, comparing scores to their respective language and cross-comparing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> There were 37 English Web sites and 30 Spanish Web sites that met inclusion criteria. When analyzing readability, English Web sites were determined to be significantly more difficult to read (average = 55.37, standard deviation [SD] = 7.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 52.9-57.9) than the Spanish Web site counterparts (average = 58.64, SD = 5.26, 95% CI = 56.8-60.5, <i>p</i> = 0.035). For quality, Spanish Web sites (average = 38, SD = 9.7, 95% CI = 34.5-41.5) were determined to be of significantly higher quality than English Web sites (average = 32.16, SD = 10.60, 95% CI = 29.7-34.6). Additionally, there was a significant difference between the non-HONCode English Web sites versus the non-HONCode Spanish Web sites (<i>p</i> = 0.0081), signifying that Spanish non-HONCode certified Web sites were less reliable than non-HONCode certified English Web sites.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong> The present study highlights the importance and necessity of providing quality, readable materials to patients seeking information regarding hearing aids. This study shows that both English and Spanish Web sites are written at a level that is much higher than the American Medical Association (AMA)-recommended sixth-grade reading level, and no Web site included in this study fell at or below the AMA-recommended sixth-grade reading level. English and Spanish Web sites also lacked consistency and quality, as evidenced by their wide variability in DISCERN scores. Specifically, Hispanic patients are more likely to suffer long-term consequences of their health care due to low levels of health literacy. It is important to bridge this gap by providing adequate reading materials. It is especially important to provide evidence-based claims that are directly supported by experts in the field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"226-233\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1791215\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1791215","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定英语和西班牙语助听器主题网站的可读性和质量。研究设计:横断面网站分析。设置:各种在线搜索引擎。方法:在四个流行的搜索引擎上查询“助听器”一词。第一个结果是75个英文网站,第一个结果是75个西班牙语网站,用于数据收集。符合纳入标准的网站根据是否存在网络健康代码(HONCode)证书进行分层。然后,文章被整理出来,由助听器专家使用DISCERN标准进行独立审查,该标准允许对网站的质量进行评估。通过计算英语的Flesch阅读简易分数和西班牙语的Fernandez Huerta公式来评估可读性。对可读性和质量进行分析,将得分与各自的语言进行比较,并进行交叉比较。结果:符合纳入标准的英文网站37个,西班牙语网站30个。在分析可读性时,英语网站的阅读难度明显高于西班牙语网站(平均= 55.37,标准差[SD] = 7.73, 95%可信区间[CI] = 52.9-57.9)(平均= 58.64,SD = 5.26, 95% CI = 56.8-60.5, p = 0.035)。在质量方面,西班牙语网站(平均= 38,SD = 9.7, 95% CI = 34.5-41.5)的质量明显高于英语网站(平均= 32.16,SD = 10.60, 95% CI = 29.7-34.6)。此外,非honcode英语网站与非honcode西班牙语网站之间存在显著差异(p = 0.0081),这表明西班牙语非honcode认证的网站比非honcode认证的英语网站更不可靠。讨论:本研究强调了为寻求助听器信息的患者提供高质量、可读材料的重要性和必要性。这项研究表明,英语和西班牙语网站的写作水平都远远高于美国医学协会(AMA)推荐的六年级阅读水平,而且本研究中没有一个网站达到或低于AMA推荐的六年级阅读水平。英语和西班牙语网站也缺乏一致性和质量,这可以从它们在DISCERN分数上的巨大差异中看出。具体而言,由于卫生知识水平低,西班牙裔患者更有可能遭受医疗保健的长期后果。通过提供足够的阅读材料来弥合这种差距是很重要的。尤其重要的是提供有证据支持的声明,并得到该领域专家的直接支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quality and Readability of Hearing Aid-Related Websites in English and Spanish.

Objective:  To determine the readability and quality of both English and Spanish Web sites for the topic of hearing aids.

Study design:  Cross-sectional Web site analysis.

Setting:  Various online search engines.

Methods:  The term "hearing aid" was queried across four popular search engines. The first resulted 75 English Web sites and first resulted 75 Spanish Web sites were extracted for data collection. Web sites that met the inclusion criteria were stratified by the presence of a Health on the Net Code (HONCode) certificate. Articles were then compiled to be independently reviewed by experts on hearing aids, using the DISCERN criteria, which allowed assessment of the quality of the Web sites. Readability was assessed by calculating the Flesch Reading Ease Score in English and the Fernandez Huerta Formula in Spanish. Readability and quality were both analyzed, comparing scores to their respective language and cross-comparing.

Results:  There were 37 English Web sites and 30 Spanish Web sites that met inclusion criteria. When analyzing readability, English Web sites were determined to be significantly more difficult to read (average = 55.37, standard deviation [SD] = 7.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 52.9-57.9) than the Spanish Web site counterparts (average = 58.64, SD = 5.26, 95% CI = 56.8-60.5, p = 0.035). For quality, Spanish Web sites (average = 38, SD = 9.7, 95% CI = 34.5-41.5) were determined to be of significantly higher quality than English Web sites (average = 32.16, SD = 10.60, 95% CI = 29.7-34.6). Additionally, there was a significant difference between the non-HONCode English Web sites versus the non-HONCode Spanish Web sites (p = 0.0081), signifying that Spanish non-HONCode certified Web sites were less reliable than non-HONCode certified English Web sites.

Discussion:  The present study highlights the importance and necessity of providing quality, readable materials to patients seeking information regarding hearing aids. This study shows that both English and Spanish Web sites are written at a level that is much higher than the American Medical Association (AMA)-recommended sixth-grade reading level, and no Web site included in this study fell at or below the AMA-recommended sixth-grade reading level. English and Spanish Web sites also lacked consistency and quality, as evidenced by their wide variability in DISCERN scores. Specifically, Hispanic patients are more likely to suffer long-term consequences of their health care due to low levels of health literacy. It is important to bridge this gap by providing adequate reading materials. It is especially important to provide evidence-based claims that are directly supported by experts in the field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA) is the Academy''s scholarly peer-reviewed publication, issued 10 times per year and available to Academy members as a benefit of membership. The JAAA publishes articles and clinical reports in all areas of audiology, including audiological assessment, amplification, aural habilitation and rehabilitation, auditory electrophysiology, vestibular assessment, and hearing science.
期刊最新文献
Pendular Nystagmus Presenting in Usher Syndrome Type I: A Case Report. Development and Standardization of Modified Simultaneous Multifrequency Stimulus for Recording Ocular Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potential and Its Interaction with the Alternate Electrode Montages. Evaluating the Clinical Reliability and Reference Values of the International Outcome Inventory for Cochlear Implants in the Department of Defense Population. Is the Otolithic Function Affected in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome? Quality and Readability of Hearing Aid-Related Websites in English and Spanish.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1