宫颈硬膜外类固醇注射后并发症的发生率及危险因素。

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2024.12.003
Harsh Wadhwa, Matthew Rohde, Jayme C B Koltsov, Akaila Cabell, Matthew Smuck, Serena S Hu, John P Kleimeyer
{"title":"宫颈硬膜外类固醇注射后并发症的发生率及危险因素。","authors":"Harsh Wadhwa, Matthew Rohde, Jayme C B Koltsov, Akaila Cabell, Matthew Smuck, Serena S Hu, John P Kleimeyer","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Cervical epidural steroid injections (CESIs) are commonly used in management of cervical pathology. While severe complications have been reported, they are rare, and thus their incidence and risk factors have not been well characterized.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the incidence of complications 7, 30, and 90 days after CESI and to identify associated risk factors.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of a large, national administrative claims database (Meritive<sup>TM</sup> Marketscan®).</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>The study included 229,412 patients (mean age 52.2 ± 11.3 years, 57.1% female) undergoing 448,209 CESIs from 2008 to 2015.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Complication rates following CESI, and risk factors for complication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults undergoing a CESI with active enrollment for one year prior to and 90 days after CESI were included. Patients with neoplasm, fracture, infection, inflammatory spondyloarthropathy or prior cervical surgery within one year preceding CESI were excluded. Multivariable repeated measures logistic regression models were used to identify risk factors for complications at 7, 30, and 90 days. Complications were stratified into procedural and medical complications. Each time point was modeled separately with Bonferroni adjustment for the multiple time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complications increased from 1.7% to 4.1%, to 8.0% within 7, 30, and 90 days, respectively. Procedural complications occurred in 0.6% of cases within 7 days, with neurologic complications occurring in 0.5% of cases. Medical complications occurred in 1.1%, 3.6%, and 7.2% within 7, 30 and 90 days, respectively. After multivariable risk adjustment, a transforaminal approach was associated with greater odd for procedural complications within 7 days relative to an interlaminar approach (p<0.001), with an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.55 (1.35, 1.77). The transforaminal approach also was associated with greater odds of neurologic complications at 7 days [1.69 (1.45, 1.95); p<0.001]. A myelopathy diagnosis was not associated with risk of overall, procedural, medical, or neurological complications. The most influential factors independently associated with greater odds of any complication within 30 days included anticoagulant prescription [5.40 (4.55, 6.41); p<0.001] and history of venous thromboembolism [3.01 (2.40, 3.77); p<0.001]. The factors most strongly associated with procedural complications at 7 days included history of neurologic deficit [3.04 (2.65, 3.50); p<0.001] and antiplatelet medication prescription [2.21 (1.49, 3.27); p=0.003].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Complications following CESIs are infrequent. Neurologic complications were most common among procedural complications at 0.5% at 7 days. The transforaminal approach was associated with higher procedural complication rate compared to the interlaminar approach. Procedural and neurological complications were also associated with multiple factors including obesity, existing neurologic deficit, anxiety, and antiplatelet medication prescription. Attention should be given to these factors to mitigate procedural complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence and risk factors for complications following cervical epidural steroid injections.\",\"authors\":\"Harsh Wadhwa, Matthew Rohde, Jayme C B Koltsov, Akaila Cabell, Matthew Smuck, Serena S Hu, John P Kleimeyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.12.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Cervical epidural steroid injections (CESIs) are commonly used in management of cervical pathology. While severe complications have been reported, they are rare, and thus their incidence and risk factors have not been well characterized.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the incidence of complications 7, 30, and 90 days after CESI and to identify associated risk factors.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of a large, national administrative claims database (Meritive<sup>TM</sup> Marketscan®).</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>The study included 229,412 patients (mean age 52.2 ± 11.3 years, 57.1% female) undergoing 448,209 CESIs from 2008 to 2015.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Complication rates following CESI, and risk factors for complication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults undergoing a CESI with active enrollment for one year prior to and 90 days after CESI were included. Patients with neoplasm, fracture, infection, inflammatory spondyloarthropathy or prior cervical surgery within one year preceding CESI were excluded. Multivariable repeated measures logistic regression models were used to identify risk factors for complications at 7, 30, and 90 days. Complications were stratified into procedural and medical complications. Each time point was modeled separately with Bonferroni adjustment for the multiple time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complications increased from 1.7% to 4.1%, to 8.0% within 7, 30, and 90 days, respectively. Procedural complications occurred in 0.6% of cases within 7 days, with neurologic complications occurring in 0.5% of cases. Medical complications occurred in 1.1%, 3.6%, and 7.2% within 7, 30 and 90 days, respectively. After multivariable risk adjustment, a transforaminal approach was associated with greater odd for procedural complications within 7 days relative to an interlaminar approach (p<0.001), with an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.55 (1.35, 1.77). The transforaminal approach also was associated with greater odds of neurologic complications at 7 days [1.69 (1.45, 1.95); p<0.001]. A myelopathy diagnosis was not associated with risk of overall, procedural, medical, or neurological complications. The most influential factors independently associated with greater odds of any complication within 30 days included anticoagulant prescription [5.40 (4.55, 6.41); p<0.001] and history of venous thromboembolism [3.01 (2.40, 3.77); p<0.001]. The factors most strongly associated with procedural complications at 7 days included history of neurologic deficit [3.04 (2.65, 3.50); p<0.001] and antiplatelet medication prescription [2.21 (1.49, 3.27); p=0.003].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Complications following CESIs are infrequent. Neurologic complications were most common among procedural complications at 0.5% at 7 days. The transforaminal approach was associated with higher procedural complication rate compared to the interlaminar approach. Procedural and neurological complications were also associated with multiple factors including obesity, existing neurologic deficit, anxiety, and antiplatelet medication prescription. Attention should be given to these factors to mitigate procedural complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.12.003\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.12.003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景背景:宫颈硬膜外类固醇注射(CESIs)常用于宫颈病理治疗。虽然有严重并发症的报道,但它们很少见,因此其发病率和危险因素尚未得到很好的描述。目的:确定CESI术后7、30、90天并发症的发生率,并确定相关危险因素。研究设计:对大型国家行政索赔数据库(MeritiveTM Marketscan®)进行回顾性队列研究。患者样本:该研究纳入2008-2015年间接受448,209例CESIs的229,412例患者(平均年龄52.2±11.3岁,女性57.1%)。结果测量:CESI后的并发症发生率和并发症的危险因素。方法:纳入CESI前1年和CESI后90天积极登记的成人。排除CESI前一年内有肿瘤、骨折、感染、炎症性颈椎病或既往颈椎手术的患者。使用多变量重复测量逻辑回归模型确定7、30和90天并发症的危险因素。并发症分为手术并发症和内科并发症。每个时间点单独建模,对多个时间点进行Bonferroni平差。结果:术后7天、30天、90天并发症发生率分别由1.7%上升至4.1%、8.0%。7天内发生手术并发症的病例占0.6%,发生神经系统并发症的病例占0.5%。在7天、30天和90天内发生医学并发症的比例分别为1.1%、3.6%和7.2%。经多变量风险调整后,经椎间孔入路与椎间孔入路相比,7天内手术并发症的发生率更高(结论:经椎间孔入路并发症并不常见)。在手术并发症中,神经系统并发症最为常见,7天时占0.5%。与椎间路入路相比,经椎间孔入路的手术并发症发生率较高。手术和神经系统并发症也与肥胖、现有神经功能障碍、焦虑和抗血小板药物处方等多种因素有关。应注意这些因素,以减轻程序上的并发症。证据等级:2;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Incidence and risk factors for complications following cervical epidural steroid injections.

Background context: Cervical epidural steroid injections (CESIs) are commonly used in management of cervical pathology. While severe complications have been reported, they are rare, and thus their incidence and risk factors have not been well characterized.

Purpose: To determine the incidence of complications 7, 30, and 90 days after CESI and to identify associated risk factors.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study of a large, national administrative claims database (MeritiveTM Marketscan®).

Patient sample: The study included 229,412 patients (mean age 52.2 ± 11.3 years, 57.1% female) undergoing 448,209 CESIs from 2008 to 2015.

Outcome measures: Complication rates following CESI, and risk factors for complication.

Methods: Adults undergoing a CESI with active enrollment for one year prior to and 90 days after CESI were included. Patients with neoplasm, fracture, infection, inflammatory spondyloarthropathy or prior cervical surgery within one year preceding CESI were excluded. Multivariable repeated measures logistic regression models were used to identify risk factors for complications at 7, 30, and 90 days. Complications were stratified into procedural and medical complications. Each time point was modeled separately with Bonferroni adjustment for the multiple time points.

Results: Complications increased from 1.7% to 4.1%, to 8.0% within 7, 30, and 90 days, respectively. Procedural complications occurred in 0.6% of cases within 7 days, with neurologic complications occurring in 0.5% of cases. Medical complications occurred in 1.1%, 3.6%, and 7.2% within 7, 30 and 90 days, respectively. After multivariable risk adjustment, a transforaminal approach was associated with greater odd for procedural complications within 7 days relative to an interlaminar approach (p<0.001), with an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.55 (1.35, 1.77). The transforaminal approach also was associated with greater odds of neurologic complications at 7 days [1.69 (1.45, 1.95); p<0.001]. A myelopathy diagnosis was not associated with risk of overall, procedural, medical, or neurological complications. The most influential factors independently associated with greater odds of any complication within 30 days included anticoagulant prescription [5.40 (4.55, 6.41); p<0.001] and history of venous thromboembolism [3.01 (2.40, 3.77); p<0.001]. The factors most strongly associated with procedural complications at 7 days included history of neurologic deficit [3.04 (2.65, 3.50); p<0.001] and antiplatelet medication prescription [2.21 (1.49, 3.27); p=0.003].

Conclusions: Complications following CESIs are infrequent. Neurologic complications were most common among procedural complications at 0.5% at 7 days. The transforaminal approach was associated with higher procedural complication rate compared to the interlaminar approach. Procedural and neurological complications were also associated with multiple factors including obesity, existing neurologic deficit, anxiety, and antiplatelet medication prescription. Attention should be given to these factors to mitigate procedural complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Failure forces of different interspinous vertebropexy techniques. The Dural Deviation Ratio: A Novel Indicator for Preoperative Differentiation of Intradural Extension in Spinal Dumbbell Tumors Schwannomas Using Axial T2-weighted MRI. Tri-cortical Pedicle Screw Fixation in the Most Cranial Instrumented Segment to Prevent Proximal Junctional Kyphosis. Incidental durotomy should not preclude same-day discharge from lumbar spine surgery. Meetings Calendar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1