探索实施一种新型的、跨诊断的、混合生态的瞬间干预来提高青少年的心理弹性(EMIcompass):现实主义框架下的过程评估。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Psychology and Psychotherapy-Theory Research and Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1111/papt.12565
Isabell Paetzold, Jessica Gugel, Anita Schick, Christian Rauschenberg, Dusan Hirjak, Benjamin Boecking, Lawrence Doi, Matthias Schwannauer, Ulrich Reininghaus
{"title":"探索实施一种新型的、跨诊断的、混合生态的瞬间干预来提高青少年的心理弹性(EMIcompass):现实主义框架下的过程评估。","authors":"Isabell Paetzold, Jessica Gugel, Anita Schick, Christian Rauschenberg, Dusan Hirjak, Benjamin Boecking, Lawrence Doi, Matthias Schwannauer, Ulrich Reininghaus","doi":"10.1111/papt.12565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Previous research indicates that the hybrid compassion-focused intervention EMIcompass may reduce stress reactivity and improve quality of life. Our aim was to investigate what components of the intervention work for whom, how, and under which circumstances to contribute to the enhancement of resilience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a process evaluation using a realist framework. First, we developed initial programme theories using compassion-focused interventions and ecological momentary intervention documents, in addition to conducting a focus group and an interview with an individual expert. Second, we tested the initial programme theories based on qualitative data from 20 participants. Third, we refined the programme theories by analysing and interpreting the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified four programme components experienced as enhancing the activation of the soothing system and the application of compassion-focused principles. EMIcompass was perceived as lowering the burden of and barriers to treatment and facilitating the translation into daily life. Intra- and interpersonal context factors interacted with the mechanisms, leading to improvement in well-being, which was identified as a main outcome.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The intervention worked by strengthening participants' soothing system and facilitating ecological translation leading to improved well-being. Adaptions to improve the intervention may allow for more flexibility in individual intervention trajectories acknowledging different needs and preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":54539,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Psychotherapy-Theory Research and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the implementation of a novel, transdiagnostic, hybrid ecological momentary intervention for improving resilience in youth (EMIcompass): A process evaluation in the realist framework.\",\"authors\":\"Isabell Paetzold, Jessica Gugel, Anita Schick, Christian Rauschenberg, Dusan Hirjak, Benjamin Boecking, Lawrence Doi, Matthias Schwannauer, Ulrich Reininghaus\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/papt.12565\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Previous research indicates that the hybrid compassion-focused intervention EMIcompass may reduce stress reactivity and improve quality of life. Our aim was to investigate what components of the intervention work for whom, how, and under which circumstances to contribute to the enhancement of resilience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a process evaluation using a realist framework. First, we developed initial programme theories using compassion-focused interventions and ecological momentary intervention documents, in addition to conducting a focus group and an interview with an individual expert. Second, we tested the initial programme theories based on qualitative data from 20 participants. Third, we refined the programme theories by analysing and interpreting the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified four programme components experienced as enhancing the activation of the soothing system and the application of compassion-focused principles. EMIcompass was perceived as lowering the burden of and barriers to treatment and facilitating the translation into daily life. Intra- and interpersonal context factors interacted with the mechanisms, leading to improvement in well-being, which was identified as a main outcome.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The intervention worked by strengthening participants' soothing system and facilitating ecological translation leading to improved well-being. Adaptions to improve the intervention may allow for more flexibility in individual intervention trajectories acknowledging different needs and preferences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology and Psychotherapy-Theory Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology and Psychotherapy-Theory Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.12565\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Psychotherapy-Theory Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.12565","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:已有研究表明,以同情为中心的混合干预EMIcompass可以减少应激反应,提高生活质量。我们的目的是调查干预的哪些组成部分对谁,如何以及在何种情况下有助于增强复原力。方法:我们使用现实主义框架进行过程评估。首先,我们利用以同情为中心的干预措施和生态瞬时干预文件,除了进行焦点小组和对个别专家的采访外,还发展了初步的计划理论。其次,我们根据来自20名参与者的定性数据测试了最初的计划理论。第三,我们通过分析和解释数据来完善程序理论。结果:我们确定了四个项目组成部分,以增强舒缓系统的激活和以同情为中心原则的应用。EMIcompass被认为降低了治疗的负担和障碍,并有助于将其转化为日常生活。内部和人际环境因素与机制相互作用,导致幸福感的改善,这被确定为主要结果。讨论:干预通过加强参与者的舒缓系统和促进生态转化来改善幸福感。改进干预措施的适应可能允许在个体干预轨迹中更大的灵活性,承认不同的需求和偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring the implementation of a novel, transdiagnostic, hybrid ecological momentary intervention for improving resilience in youth (EMIcompass): A process evaluation in the realist framework.

Objectives: Previous research indicates that the hybrid compassion-focused intervention EMIcompass may reduce stress reactivity and improve quality of life. Our aim was to investigate what components of the intervention work for whom, how, and under which circumstances to contribute to the enhancement of resilience.

Methods: We conducted a process evaluation using a realist framework. First, we developed initial programme theories using compassion-focused interventions and ecological momentary intervention documents, in addition to conducting a focus group and an interview with an individual expert. Second, we tested the initial programme theories based on qualitative data from 20 participants. Third, we refined the programme theories by analysing and interpreting the data.

Results: We identified four programme components experienced as enhancing the activation of the soothing system and the application of compassion-focused principles. EMIcompass was perceived as lowering the burden of and barriers to treatment and facilitating the translation into daily life. Intra- and interpersonal context factors interacted with the mechanisms, leading to improvement in well-being, which was identified as a main outcome.

Discussion: The intervention worked by strengthening participants' soothing system and facilitating ecological translation leading to improved well-being. Adaptions to improve the intervention may allow for more flexibility in individual intervention trajectories acknowledging different needs and preferences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory Research and Practice (formerly The British Journal of Medical Psychology) is an international scientific journal with a focus on the psychological and social processes that underlie the development and improvement of psychological problems and mental wellbeing, including: theoretical and research development in the understanding of cognitive and emotional factors in psychological problems; behaviour and relationships; vulnerability to, adjustment to, assessment of, and recovery (assisted or otherwise) from psychological distresses; psychological therapies with a focus on understanding the processes which affect outcomes where mental health is concerned.
期刊最新文献
A randomised feasibility trial comparing group and individual format GROUPS FOR HEALTH interventions for loneliness in people who experience psychosis. A qualitative exploration of change processes relevant to compassion-focused therapy that occurs when people view both soothing and non-soothing images. Veterans' experiences of somatic experiencing and prolonged exposure therapies for post-traumatic stress disorder: A qualitative analysis. Clients' experiences of psychotherapeutic interventions addressing trauma. "It's like I used to share a room with self-injury, but now it lives next door": Exploring experiences of naturalistic improvement in non-suicidal self-injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1