Erin Elizabeth King-Podzaline, Gabriella-Louise Stephen, Alexandria Bokhart, Pedro Henrique Esteves Trindade, Victoria Rocha Merenda, Monique Danielle Pairis-Garcia
{"title":"2%利多卡因皮内和美洛昔康肌内多模态疼痛控制方案在无针系统下减轻仔猪行为性阉割疼痛的效果","authors":"Erin Elizabeth King-Podzaline, Gabriella-Louise Stephen, Alexandria Bokhart, Pedro Henrique Esteves Trindade, Victoria Rocha Merenda, Monique Danielle Pairis-Garcia","doi":"10.1080/10888705.2024.2440894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mitigating piglet castration pain is critical to minimize negative experiences and contribute to a positive affective state. A multimodal pain control protocol (needleless 2% lidocaine intradermal/0.4 mg/kg meloxicam intramuscular) was evaluated. Males were administered one of four treatments: (1) needleless lidocaine/meloxicam intramuscular (LM), (2) needleless lidocaine/saline intramuscular (LS), (3) needleless saline/meloxicam intramuscular (SM), and (4) needleless saline/saline intramuscular (SS). Females were sham castrated (SH). Piglets were recorded 24h pre-castration (M1) and 15min (M2), 3h (M3), and 24h post-castration (M4). The Unesp-Botucatu Composite Acute Pain Scale (UPAPS) was used to assess pain behavior. From a treatment standpoint, scores did not differ at M1 (<i>P</i> = 1.00) or M4 (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.36). However, at M2, LS piglets had (<i>P</i> < 0.01) higher scores (3.4) than LM piglets (1.6) and SH piglets had (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.01) the lowest scores (0.02). From a timepoint standpoint, piglets in the LS, LM, SM, and SS groups had (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.05) higher scores at M2 compared with their baseline scores at M1. These results indicate that needleless lidocaine and intramuscular meloxicam offered no analgesic benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":56277,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of a Multimodal Pain Control Protocol Using 2% Lidocaine Intradermal and Meloxicam Intramuscular on Mitigating Behavioral Castration Pain in Piglets Using a Needleless System.\",\"authors\":\"Erin Elizabeth King-Podzaline, Gabriella-Louise Stephen, Alexandria Bokhart, Pedro Henrique Esteves Trindade, Victoria Rocha Merenda, Monique Danielle Pairis-Garcia\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10888705.2024.2440894\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mitigating piglet castration pain is critical to minimize negative experiences and contribute to a positive affective state. A multimodal pain control protocol (needleless 2% lidocaine intradermal/0.4 mg/kg meloxicam intramuscular) was evaluated. Males were administered one of four treatments: (1) needleless lidocaine/meloxicam intramuscular (LM), (2) needleless lidocaine/saline intramuscular (LS), (3) needleless saline/meloxicam intramuscular (SM), and (4) needleless saline/saline intramuscular (SS). Females were sham castrated (SH). Piglets were recorded 24h pre-castration (M1) and 15min (M2), 3h (M3), and 24h post-castration (M4). The Unesp-Botucatu Composite Acute Pain Scale (UPAPS) was used to assess pain behavior. From a treatment standpoint, scores did not differ at M1 (<i>P</i> = 1.00) or M4 (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.36). However, at M2, LS piglets had (<i>P</i> < 0.01) higher scores (3.4) than LM piglets (1.6) and SH piglets had (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.01) the lowest scores (0.02). From a timepoint standpoint, piglets in the LS, LM, SM, and SS groups had (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.05) higher scores at M2 compared with their baseline scores at M1. These results indicate that needleless lidocaine and intramuscular meloxicam offered no analgesic benefit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2024.2440894\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2024.2440894","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of a Multimodal Pain Control Protocol Using 2% Lidocaine Intradermal and Meloxicam Intramuscular on Mitigating Behavioral Castration Pain in Piglets Using a Needleless System.
Mitigating piglet castration pain is critical to minimize negative experiences and contribute to a positive affective state. A multimodal pain control protocol (needleless 2% lidocaine intradermal/0.4 mg/kg meloxicam intramuscular) was evaluated. Males were administered one of four treatments: (1) needleless lidocaine/meloxicam intramuscular (LM), (2) needleless lidocaine/saline intramuscular (LS), (3) needleless saline/meloxicam intramuscular (SM), and (4) needleless saline/saline intramuscular (SS). Females were sham castrated (SH). Piglets were recorded 24h pre-castration (M1) and 15min (M2), 3h (M3), and 24h post-castration (M4). The Unesp-Botucatu Composite Acute Pain Scale (UPAPS) was used to assess pain behavior. From a treatment standpoint, scores did not differ at M1 (P = 1.00) or M4 (P ≥ 0.36). However, at M2, LS piglets had (P < 0.01) higher scores (3.4) than LM piglets (1.6) and SH piglets had (P ≤ 0.01) the lowest scores (0.02). From a timepoint standpoint, piglets in the LS, LM, SM, and SS groups had (P ≤ 0.05) higher scores at M2 compared with their baseline scores at M1. These results indicate that needleless lidocaine and intramuscular meloxicam offered no analgesic benefit.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science (JAAWS) publishes articles on methods of experimentation, husbandry, and care that demonstrably enhance the welfare of nonhuman animals in various settings. For administrative purposes, manuscripts are categorized into the following four content areas: welfare issues arising in laboratory, farm, companion animal, and wildlife/zoo settings. Manuscripts of up to 7,000 words are accepted that present new empirical data or a reevaluation of available data, conceptual or theoretical analysis, or demonstrations relating to some issue of animal welfare science. JAAWS also publishes brief research reports of up to 3,500 words that consist of (1) pilot studies, (2) descriptions of innovative practices, (3) studies of interest to a particular region, or (4) studies done by scholars who are new to the field or new to academic publishing. In addition, JAAWS publishes book reviews and literature reviews by invitation only.