长效胰高血糖素样肽-2类似物格列帕鲁肽可减少短肠综合征患者的肠外支持:一项3期随机对照试验

IF 25.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1053/j.gastro.2024.11.023
Palle B. Jeppesen, Tim Vanuytsel, Sukanya Subramanian, Francisca Joly, Geert Wanten, Georg Lamprecht, Marek Kunecki, Farooq Rahman, Thor S.S. Nielsen, Mark Berner-Hansen, Ulrich-Frank Pape, David F. Mercer
{"title":"长效胰高血糖素样肽-2类似物格列帕鲁肽可减少短肠综合征患者的肠外支持:一项3期随机对照试验","authors":"Palle B. Jeppesen, Tim Vanuytsel, Sukanya Subramanian, Francisca Joly, Geert Wanten, Georg Lamprecht, Marek Kunecki, Farooq Rahman, Thor S.S. Nielsen, Mark Berner-Hansen, Ulrich-Frank Pape, David F. Mercer","doi":"10.1053/j.gastro.2024.11.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>BACKGROUND AND AIMS</h3>Glepaglutide is a long-acting GLP-2 analog developed to improve intestinal absorption in short bowel syndrome (SBS) patients. We conducted a trial to establish efficacy and safety of glepaglutide in reducing parenteral support (PS) needs in SBS patients with intestinal failure (IF).<h3>METHODS</h3>In an international, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, phase 3 trial, SBS-IF patients requiring PS ≥3 days/week were randomized 1:1:1 to 24 weeks of glepaglutide 10 mg twice-weekly (TW) or once-weekly (OW), or placebo. PS volume was equivalently reduced if average urine volume of a 48-hour balance period exceeded baseline values by &gt;10%.<h3>RESULTS</h3>106 patients were randomized and dosed. Glepaglutide TW significantly reduced weekly PS volumes from baseline to week 24 versus placebo (mean change of −5.13 vs. −2.85 L/week; <em>P</em> = .0039; primary endpoint). Results were similar across major anatomical subgroups. Glepaglutide TW was also superior to placebo for key secondary endpoints of proportion of patients achieving clinical response defined as ≥20% PS volume reduction from baseline to weeks 20 and 24 (65.7% vs. 38.9%; <em>P</em> = .0243), and patients achieving a reduction in days on PS ≥1 day/week from baseline to week 24 (51.4% vs. 19.4%; <em>P</em> = .0043). Complete PS weaning (“enteral autonomy”) was achieved for 5 patients (14%) receiving glepaglutide TW versus 0 for placebo patients. No statistically significant differences were shown for glepaglutide OW versus placebo for primary or key secondary endpoints. Significant glepaglutide benefits on patient-reported outcome (Patient Global Impression of Change) were shown. Glepaglutide was assessed to be safe and well tolerated.<h3>CONCLUSION</h3>Glepaglutide treatment in SBS-IF patients resulted in clinically relevant reductions in PS requirements and was well tolerated.","PeriodicalId":12590,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glepaglutide, a Long-acting Glucagon-like Peptide-2 Analog, Reduces Parenteral Support in Patients with Short Bowel Syndrome: a Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"Palle B. Jeppesen, Tim Vanuytsel, Sukanya Subramanian, Francisca Joly, Geert Wanten, Georg Lamprecht, Marek Kunecki, Farooq Rahman, Thor S.S. Nielsen, Mark Berner-Hansen, Ulrich-Frank Pape, David F. Mercer\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.gastro.2024.11.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>BACKGROUND AND AIMS</h3>Glepaglutide is a long-acting GLP-2 analog developed to improve intestinal absorption in short bowel syndrome (SBS) patients. We conducted a trial to establish efficacy and safety of glepaglutide in reducing parenteral support (PS) needs in SBS patients with intestinal failure (IF).<h3>METHODS</h3>In an international, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, phase 3 trial, SBS-IF patients requiring PS ≥3 days/week were randomized 1:1:1 to 24 weeks of glepaglutide 10 mg twice-weekly (TW) or once-weekly (OW), or placebo. PS volume was equivalently reduced if average urine volume of a 48-hour balance period exceeded baseline values by &gt;10%.<h3>RESULTS</h3>106 patients were randomized and dosed. Glepaglutide TW significantly reduced weekly PS volumes from baseline to week 24 versus placebo (mean change of −5.13 vs. −2.85 L/week; <em>P</em> = .0039; primary endpoint). Results were similar across major anatomical subgroups. Glepaglutide TW was also superior to placebo for key secondary endpoints of proportion of patients achieving clinical response defined as ≥20% PS volume reduction from baseline to weeks 20 and 24 (65.7% vs. 38.9%; <em>P</em> = .0243), and patients achieving a reduction in days on PS ≥1 day/week from baseline to week 24 (51.4% vs. 19.4%; <em>P</em> = .0043). Complete PS weaning (“enteral autonomy”) was achieved for 5 patients (14%) receiving glepaglutide TW versus 0 for placebo patients. No statistically significant differences were shown for glepaglutide OW versus placebo for primary or key secondary endpoints. Significant glepaglutide benefits on patient-reported outcome (Patient Global Impression of Change) were shown. Glepaglutide was assessed to be safe and well tolerated.<h3>CONCLUSION</h3>Glepaglutide treatment in SBS-IF patients resulted in clinically relevant reductions in PS requirements and was well tolerated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":25.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2024.11.023\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2024.11.023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的格列鲁肽是一种长效GLP-2类似物,用于改善短肠综合征(SBS)患者的肠道吸收。我们进行了一项试验,以确定格列鲁肽在减少SBS肠衰竭(IF)患者肠外支持(PS)需求方面的有效性和安全性。方法在一项国际、安慰剂对照、随机、平行组、双盲、3期试验中,需要PS≥3天/周的SBS-IF患者以1:1:1的比例随机分配给格列鲁肽10mg,每周两次(TW)或每周一次(OW),或安慰剂。如果48小时平衡期的平均尿量超过基线值10%,则PS量也会相应减少。结果106例患者被随机分组并给药。从基线到第24周,与安慰剂相比,格列鲁肽TW显著降低了每周PS体积(平均变化为- 5.13 L/周vs - 2.85 L/周;P = 0.0039;主要终点)。主要解剖亚群的结果相似。格列鲁肽TW在达到临床缓解的患者比例(定义为从基线到第20周和第24周PS体积减少≥20%)的关键次要终点上也优于安慰剂(65.7% vs. 38.9%;P = 0.0243),从基线到第24周,患者服用PS≥1天/周的天数减少(51.4% vs. 19.4%;P = .0043)。接受格列鲁肽TW治疗的5例患者(14%)实现了完全的PS断奶(“肠内自主”),而安慰剂患者为0例。格帕鲁肽OW与安慰剂在主要终点或关键次要终点上没有统计学上的显著差异。显示了显著的格帕鲁肽对患者报告的结果(患者总体变化印象)的益处。格列帕鲁肽被评估为安全且耐受性良好。结论:来帕鲁肽治疗SBS-IF患者可降低临床相关的PS需求,且耐受性良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Glepaglutide, a Long-acting Glucagon-like Peptide-2 Analog, Reduces Parenteral Support in Patients with Short Bowel Syndrome: a Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Glepaglutide is a long-acting GLP-2 analog developed to improve intestinal absorption in short bowel syndrome (SBS) patients. We conducted a trial to establish efficacy and safety of glepaglutide in reducing parenteral support (PS) needs in SBS patients with intestinal failure (IF).

METHODS

In an international, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, phase 3 trial, SBS-IF patients requiring PS ≥3 days/week were randomized 1:1:1 to 24 weeks of glepaglutide 10 mg twice-weekly (TW) or once-weekly (OW), or placebo. PS volume was equivalently reduced if average urine volume of a 48-hour balance period exceeded baseline values by >10%.

RESULTS

106 patients were randomized and dosed. Glepaglutide TW significantly reduced weekly PS volumes from baseline to week 24 versus placebo (mean change of −5.13 vs. −2.85 L/week; P = .0039; primary endpoint). Results were similar across major anatomical subgroups. Glepaglutide TW was also superior to placebo for key secondary endpoints of proportion of patients achieving clinical response defined as ≥20% PS volume reduction from baseline to weeks 20 and 24 (65.7% vs. 38.9%; P = .0243), and patients achieving a reduction in days on PS ≥1 day/week from baseline to week 24 (51.4% vs. 19.4%; P = .0043). Complete PS weaning (“enteral autonomy”) was achieved for 5 patients (14%) receiving glepaglutide TW versus 0 for placebo patients. No statistically significant differences were shown for glepaglutide OW versus placebo for primary or key secondary endpoints. Significant glepaglutide benefits on patient-reported outcome (Patient Global Impression of Change) were shown. Glepaglutide was assessed to be safe and well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Glepaglutide treatment in SBS-IF patients resulted in clinically relevant reductions in PS requirements and was well tolerated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gastroenterology
Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
45.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
4366
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Gastroenterology is the most prominent journal in the field of gastrointestinal disease. It is the flagship journal of the American Gastroenterological Association and delivers authoritative coverage of clinical, translational, and basic studies of all aspects of the digestive system, including the liver and pancreas, as well as nutrition. Some regular features of Gastroenterology include original research studies by leading authorities, comprehensive reviews and perspectives on important topics in adult and pediatric gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal also includes features such as editorials, correspondence, and commentaries, as well as special sections like "Mentoring, Education and Training Corner," "Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in GI," "Gastro Digest," "Gastro Curbside Consult," and "Gastro Grand Rounds." Gastroenterology also provides digital media materials such as videos and "GI Rapid Reel" animations. It is abstracted and indexed in various databases including Scopus, Biological Abstracts, Current Contents, Embase, Nutrition Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, Current Awareness in Biological Sciences, PubMed/Medline, and the Science Citation Index.
期刊最新文献
Reply to Takefuji POEM Progress and Unresolved Issues: A Decade of Expert Insights Comments on biologic ranking methodology used by the network meta-analysis to inform the 2024 ulcerative colitis guideline Burden and social determinants of health in pediatric IBD: Lessons learned from epidemiologic studies using health administrative data Enhancing Colorectal Cancer Subtyping: Addressing Limitations of L1-Penalized Estimation in Alternative Splicing Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1