{"title":"加州第 36 号提案：毒品政策钟摆回转","authors":"John de Miranda","doi":"10.1002/adaw.34351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Most probably influenced by media images of smash-and-grab robberies, almost 10 million California voters (68.6%), by voting “Yes” for Proposition 36, decided that these crimes should be addressed. Unfortunately, once again drug use and users were joined to these crimes, and the result is a rollback of some of the progressive drug policies of recent years.</p>","PeriodicalId":100073,"journal":{"name":"Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Weekly","volume":"36 47","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"California's Proposition 36: The drug policy pendulum swings back\",\"authors\":\"John de Miranda\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/adaw.34351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Most probably influenced by media images of smash-and-grab robberies, almost 10 million California voters (68.6%), by voting “Yes” for Proposition 36, decided that these crimes should be addressed. Unfortunately, once again drug use and users were joined to these crimes, and the result is a rollback of some of the progressive drug policies of recent years.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Weekly\",\"volume\":\"36 47\",\"pages\":\"5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Weekly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adaw.34351\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Weekly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adaw.34351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
California's Proposition 36: The drug policy pendulum swings back
Most probably influenced by media images of smash-and-grab robberies, almost 10 million California voters (68.6%), by voting “Yes” for Proposition 36, decided that these crimes should be addressed. Unfortunately, once again drug use and users were joined to these crimes, and the result is a rollback of some of the progressive drug policies of recent years.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
