广义纵坐标下的平均流体静力Boussinesq海洋方程

IF 4.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems Pub Date : 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1029/2024MS004506
Malte F. Jansen, Alistair Adcroft, Stephen M. Griffies, Ian Grooms
{"title":"广义纵坐标下的平均流体静力Boussinesq海洋方程","authors":"Malte F. Jansen,&nbsp;Alistair Adcroft,&nbsp;Stephen M. Griffies,&nbsp;Ian Grooms","doi":"10.1029/2024MS004506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Due to their limited resolution, numerical ocean models need to be interpreted as representing filtered or averaged equations. How to interpret models in terms of formally averaged equations, however, is not always clear, particularly in the case of hybrid or generalized vertical coordinate models, which limits our ability to interpret the model results and to develop parameterizations for the unresolved eddy contributions. We here derive the averaged hydrostatic Boussinesq equations in generalized vertical coordinates for an arbitrary thickness-weighted average. We then consider various special cases and discuss the extent to which the averaged equations are consistent with existing ocean model formulations. As previously discussed, the momentum equations in existing depth-coordinate models are best interpreted as representing Eulerian averages (i.e., averages taken at fixed depth), while the tracer equations can be interpreted as either Eulerian or thickness-weighted isopycnal averages. Instead we find that no averaging is fully consistent with existing formulations of the parameterizations in semi-Lagrangian discretizations of generalized vertical coordinate ocean models such as MOM6. A coordinate-following average would require “coordinate-aware” parameterizations that can account for the changing nature of the eddy terms as the coordinate changes. Alternatively, the model variables can be interpreted as representing either Eulerian or (thickness-weighted) isopycnal averages, independent of the model coordinate that is being used for the numerical discretization. Existing parameterizations in generalized vertical coordinate models, however, are not always consistent with either of these interpretations, which, respectively, would require a three-dimensional divergence-free eddy tracer advection or a form-stress parameterization in the momentum equations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems","volume":"16 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024MS004506","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Averaged Hydrostatic Boussinesq Ocean Equations in Generalized Vertical Coordinates\",\"authors\":\"Malte F. Jansen,&nbsp;Alistair Adcroft,&nbsp;Stephen M. Griffies,&nbsp;Ian Grooms\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024MS004506\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Due to their limited resolution, numerical ocean models need to be interpreted as representing filtered or averaged equations. How to interpret models in terms of formally averaged equations, however, is not always clear, particularly in the case of hybrid or generalized vertical coordinate models, which limits our ability to interpret the model results and to develop parameterizations for the unresolved eddy contributions. We here derive the averaged hydrostatic Boussinesq equations in generalized vertical coordinates for an arbitrary thickness-weighted average. We then consider various special cases and discuss the extent to which the averaged equations are consistent with existing ocean model formulations. As previously discussed, the momentum equations in existing depth-coordinate models are best interpreted as representing Eulerian averages (i.e., averages taken at fixed depth), while the tracer equations can be interpreted as either Eulerian or thickness-weighted isopycnal averages. Instead we find that no averaging is fully consistent with existing formulations of the parameterizations in semi-Lagrangian discretizations of generalized vertical coordinate ocean models such as MOM6. A coordinate-following average would require “coordinate-aware” parameterizations that can account for the changing nature of the eddy terms as the coordinate changes. Alternatively, the model variables can be interpreted as representing either Eulerian or (thickness-weighted) isopycnal averages, independent of the model coordinate that is being used for the numerical discretization. Existing parameterizations in generalized vertical coordinate models, however, are not always consistent with either of these interpretations, which, respectively, would require a three-dimensional divergence-free eddy tracer advection or a form-stress parameterization in the momentum equations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems\",\"volume\":\"16 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024MS004506\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024MS004506\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024MS004506","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于它们的分辨率有限,数值海洋模式需要被解释为代表过滤或平均方程。然而,如何用正式的平均方程来解释模型并不总是很清楚,特别是在混合或广义垂直坐标模型的情况下,这限制了我们解释模型结果和为未解决的涡贡献开发参数化的能力。在这里,我们导出了任意厚度加权平均值在广义纵坐标下的平均流体静力Boussinesq方程。然后,我们考虑各种特殊情况,并讨论平均方程与现有海洋模式公式一致的程度。如前所述,现有深度坐标模型中的动量方程最好解释为代表欧拉平均(即固定深度的平均值),而示踪方程可以解释为欧拉或厚度加权等压平均。相反,我们发现在广义垂直坐标海洋模式(如MOM6)的半拉格朗日离散化中,没有一个平均与现有的参数化公式完全一致。随坐标变化的平均值需要“坐标感知”的参数化,它可以解释随着坐标变化而变化的涡流项的性质。或者,模型变量可以被解释为代表欧拉或(厚度加权)等共平均,独立于用于数值离散化的模型坐标。然而,在广义垂直坐标模型中的现有参数化并不总是与这两种解释中的任何一种一致,这两种解释分别需要三维无散度涡旋示踪平流或动量方程中的形式应力参数化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Averaged Hydrostatic Boussinesq Ocean Equations in Generalized Vertical Coordinates

Due to their limited resolution, numerical ocean models need to be interpreted as representing filtered or averaged equations. How to interpret models in terms of formally averaged equations, however, is not always clear, particularly in the case of hybrid or generalized vertical coordinate models, which limits our ability to interpret the model results and to develop parameterizations for the unresolved eddy contributions. We here derive the averaged hydrostatic Boussinesq equations in generalized vertical coordinates for an arbitrary thickness-weighted average. We then consider various special cases and discuss the extent to which the averaged equations are consistent with existing ocean model formulations. As previously discussed, the momentum equations in existing depth-coordinate models are best interpreted as representing Eulerian averages (i.e., averages taken at fixed depth), while the tracer equations can be interpreted as either Eulerian or thickness-weighted isopycnal averages. Instead we find that no averaging is fully consistent with existing formulations of the parameterizations in semi-Lagrangian discretizations of generalized vertical coordinate ocean models such as MOM6. A coordinate-following average would require “coordinate-aware” parameterizations that can account for the changing nature of the eddy terms as the coordinate changes. Alternatively, the model variables can be interpreted as representing either Eulerian or (thickness-weighted) isopycnal averages, independent of the model coordinate that is being used for the numerical discretization. Existing parameterizations in generalized vertical coordinate models, however, are not always consistent with either of these interpretations, which, respectively, would require a three-dimensional divergence-free eddy tracer advection or a form-stress parameterization in the momentum equations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES-
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
241
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems (JAMES) is committed to advancing the science of Earth systems modeling by offering high-quality scientific research through online availability and open access licensing. JAMES invites authors and readers from the international Earth systems modeling community. Open access. Articles are available free of charge for everyone with Internet access to view and download. Formal peer review. Supplemental material, such as code samples, images, and visualizations, is published at no additional charge. No additional charge for color figures. Modest page charges to cover production costs. Articles published in high-quality full text PDF, HTML, and XML. Internal and external reference linking, DOI registration, and forward linking via CrossRef.
期刊最新文献
Bridging the Gap Between Global Weather Prediction and Global Storm-Resolving Simulation: Introducing the GFDL 6.5-km SHiELD The Averaged Hydrostatic Boussinesq Ocean Equations in Generalized Vertical Coordinates Improving Urban Climate Adaptation Modeling in the Community Earth System Model (CESM) Through Transient Urban Surface Albedo Representation Physical Drivers and Biogeochemical Effects of the Projected Decline of the Shelfbreak Jet in the Northwest North Atlantic Ocean Climatological Adaptive Bias Correction of Climate Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1