对旨在帮助黑人和西班牙裔个人的平权行动的态度:知识、种族和感知歧视的作用

IF 1.8 4区 社会学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy Pub Date : 2024-09-22 DOI:10.1111/asap.12428
Marden J. Umanzor, David J. Reyna Guerrero, Randall E. Osborne, Ariel A. McField, Crystal D. Oberle
{"title":"对旨在帮助黑人和西班牙裔个人的平权行动的态度:知识、种族和感知歧视的作用","authors":"Marden J. Umanzor,&nbsp;David J. Reyna Guerrero,&nbsp;Randall E. Osborne,&nbsp;Ariel A. McField,&nbsp;Crystal D. Oberle","doi":"10.1111/asap.12428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study explored factors affecting affirmative action attitudes. Undergraduates at a Hispanic-Serving Institution completed measures assessing support for Black-targeted and Hispanic-targeted affirmative action, perceived discrimination against Blacks and Hispanics, and demographic information. Prior to completing these measures, some participants were randomly assigned to read 10 facts about current racial inequities. An ANOVA revealed a marginally significant effect of condition (with greater affirmative action support by participants who read facts about racial inequities vs. the control condition), a significant effect of participant race (with greater affirmative action support by Black and Hispanic vs. White participants), and a significant interaction between participant and target race (with greater support of Hispanic-targeted vs. Black-targeted affirmative action by White and Hispanic participants, but no difference in support for Hispanic-targeted vs. Black-targeted affirmative action by Black participants). Regression analyses revealed that affirmative action support was significantly associated with a Democrat affiliation, a Black or Hispanic race, and perceived discrimination against Blacks and Hispanics. These findings are consistent with social dominance theory (whereby group status threat may influence Hispanic affirmative action support) and the altruism-born-of-suffering theory (whereby adverse discriminatory experiences of Blacks may lead to greater empathy and support for affirmative action).</p>","PeriodicalId":46799,"journal":{"name":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","volume":"24 3","pages":"734-756"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/asap.12428","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitudes on affirmative action targeted to help Black and Hispanic individuals: The roles of knowledge, race, and perceived discrimination\",\"authors\":\"Marden J. Umanzor,&nbsp;David J. Reyna Guerrero,&nbsp;Randall E. Osborne,&nbsp;Ariel A. McField,&nbsp;Crystal D. Oberle\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/asap.12428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study explored factors affecting affirmative action attitudes. Undergraduates at a Hispanic-Serving Institution completed measures assessing support for Black-targeted and Hispanic-targeted affirmative action, perceived discrimination against Blacks and Hispanics, and demographic information. Prior to completing these measures, some participants were randomly assigned to read 10 facts about current racial inequities. An ANOVA revealed a marginally significant effect of condition (with greater affirmative action support by participants who read facts about racial inequities vs. the control condition), a significant effect of participant race (with greater affirmative action support by Black and Hispanic vs. White participants), and a significant interaction between participant and target race (with greater support of Hispanic-targeted vs. Black-targeted affirmative action by White and Hispanic participants, but no difference in support for Hispanic-targeted vs. Black-targeted affirmative action by Black participants). Regression analyses revealed that affirmative action support was significantly associated with a Democrat affiliation, a Black or Hispanic race, and perceived discrimination against Blacks and Hispanics. These findings are consistent with social dominance theory (whereby group status threat may influence Hispanic affirmative action support) and the altruism-born-of-suffering theory (whereby adverse discriminatory experiences of Blacks may lead to greater empathy and support for affirmative action).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy\",\"volume\":\"24 3\",\"pages\":\"734-756\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/asap.12428\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/asap.12428\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/asap.12428","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨影响平权行动态度的因素。一所西班牙裔服务机构的本科生完成了对针对黑人和针对西班牙裔的平权行动的支持程度、对黑人和西班牙裔的歧视以及人口统计信息的评估。在完成这些测试之前,一些参与者被随机分配阅读10个关于当前种族不平等的事实。方差分析显示,条件的影响(阅读种族不平等事实的参与者对平权行动的支持程度高于对照条件)、参与者种族的影响(黑人和西班牙裔参与者对平权行动的支持程度高于白人参与者)以及参与者和目标种族之间的显著互动(白人和西班牙裔参与者对以西班牙裔为目标的平权行动的支持程度高于以黑人为目标的平权行动的支持程度)。但黑人参与者对针对西班牙裔和针对黑人的平权行动的支持没有差异)。回归分析显示,平权行动的支持与民主党、黑人或西班牙裔以及对黑人和西班牙裔的歧视显著相关。这些发现与社会支配理论(即群体地位威胁可能影响西班牙裔对平权行动的支持)和利他主义源于苦难理论(即黑人的不利歧视经历可能导致对平权行动的更大同情和支持)相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Attitudes on affirmative action targeted to help Black and Hispanic individuals: The roles of knowledge, race, and perceived discrimination

This study explored factors affecting affirmative action attitudes. Undergraduates at a Hispanic-Serving Institution completed measures assessing support for Black-targeted and Hispanic-targeted affirmative action, perceived discrimination against Blacks and Hispanics, and demographic information. Prior to completing these measures, some participants were randomly assigned to read 10 facts about current racial inequities. An ANOVA revealed a marginally significant effect of condition (with greater affirmative action support by participants who read facts about racial inequities vs. the control condition), a significant effect of participant race (with greater affirmative action support by Black and Hispanic vs. White participants), and a significant interaction between participant and target race (with greater support of Hispanic-targeted vs. Black-targeted affirmative action by White and Hispanic participants, but no difference in support for Hispanic-targeted vs. Black-targeted affirmative action by Black participants). Regression analyses revealed that affirmative action support was significantly associated with a Democrat affiliation, a Black or Hispanic race, and perceived discrimination against Blacks and Hispanics. These findings are consistent with social dominance theory (whereby group status threat may influence Hispanic affirmative action support) and the altruism-born-of-suffering theory (whereby adverse discriminatory experiences of Blacks may lead to greater empathy and support for affirmative action).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Recent articles in ASAP have examined social psychological methods in the study of economic and social justice including ageism, heterosexism, racism, sexism, status quo bias and other forms of discrimination, social problems such as climate change, extremism, homelessness, inter-group conflict, natural disasters, poverty, and terrorism, and social ideals such as democracy, empowerment, equality, health, and trust.
期刊最新文献
LGBTQ+ conspiracy beliefs and collective actions: Factors and processes that (de)motivate support for LGBTQ+ equality Founder ownership and system-justifying beliefs in relation to perception toward Black Lives Matter and other social movements When longing goes wrong: Nostalgia can cause a preference for harmful aspects of the past Exploring disparities in research through the lens of epistemic exclusion: A focus on Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy Testing the interrelationship between area deprivation and ethnic disparities in sentencing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1