基于 CMIP6 模型的气候偏差和径流敏感性对印度中部径流预测不确定性的影响

IF 3.5 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES International Journal of Climatology Pub Date : 2024-10-26 DOI:10.1002/joc.8661
Shoobhangi Tyagi, Sandeep Sahany, Dharmendra Saraswat, Saroj Kanta Mishra, Amlendu Dubey, Dev Niyogi
{"title":"基于 CMIP6 模型的气候偏差和径流敏感性对印度中部径流预测不确定性的影响","authors":"Shoobhangi Tyagi,&nbsp;Sandeep Sahany,&nbsp;Dharmendra Saraswat,&nbsp;Saroj Kanta Mishra,&nbsp;Amlendu Dubey,&nbsp;Dev Niyogi","doi":"10.1002/joc.8661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate runoff projections are vital for developing climate adaptation strategies, yet significant uncertainties persist. The commonly employed approaches to constrain these uncertainties rely on the stationarity of climate biases and runoff sensitivity, which may not hold for climate-sensitive regions (e.g., semi-arid regions). This study investigates the validity of the stationarity assumption across 29 CMIP6 models, encompassing diverse climate biases (Dry Warm, Wet Warm, Dry Cold, and Wet Cold), utilising a semi-arid region in central India as a testbed. The implications of this assumption on runoff projection uncertainties were comprehensively assessed across the runoff modelling chain for three time periods (the 2030s, 2060s and 2090s) based on the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) simulations. The results highlight the non-stationary nature of climate biases and runoff sensitivity under future scenarios, challenging the widespread applicability of common uncertainty-constraining approaches. Moreover, the impact of non-stationarity on runoff projection uncertainty was found to be strongly influenced by the choice of GCMs, preprocessing methods and climate change scenarios. In the 2030s, GCMs dominate runoff uncertainty, with dry models exhibiting ~10%–15% higher uncertainty compared to warm models, which is further amplified when interacting with warm biases. However, from the mid-century onwards, the bias-adjustment approaches and climate change scenarios significantly shape runoff projection uncertainties under non-stationary conditions. These findings emphasise the potential of climate bias and runoff sensitivity-based GCM selection for reducing runoff uncertainty in near-future assessment (2030s). For mid-term and long-term runoff projections, addressing diverse climate biases through bias-adjustment approaches is more viable. This study offers critical insights to prioritise the development of a non-stationarity-based approach for reliable runoff projections in climate-sensitive regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":13779,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Climatology","volume":"44 16","pages":"5727-5744"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joc.8661","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implications of CMIP6 Models-Based Climate Biases and Runoff Sensitivity on Runoff Projection Uncertainties Over Central India\",\"authors\":\"Shoobhangi Tyagi,&nbsp;Sandeep Sahany,&nbsp;Dharmendra Saraswat,&nbsp;Saroj Kanta Mishra,&nbsp;Amlendu Dubey,&nbsp;Dev Niyogi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/joc.8661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Accurate runoff projections are vital for developing climate adaptation strategies, yet significant uncertainties persist. The commonly employed approaches to constrain these uncertainties rely on the stationarity of climate biases and runoff sensitivity, which may not hold for climate-sensitive regions (e.g., semi-arid regions). This study investigates the validity of the stationarity assumption across 29 CMIP6 models, encompassing diverse climate biases (Dry Warm, Wet Warm, Dry Cold, and Wet Cold), utilising a semi-arid region in central India as a testbed. The implications of this assumption on runoff projection uncertainties were comprehensively assessed across the runoff modelling chain for three time periods (the 2030s, 2060s and 2090s) based on the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) simulations. The results highlight the non-stationary nature of climate biases and runoff sensitivity under future scenarios, challenging the widespread applicability of common uncertainty-constraining approaches. Moreover, the impact of non-stationarity on runoff projection uncertainty was found to be strongly influenced by the choice of GCMs, preprocessing methods and climate change scenarios. In the 2030s, GCMs dominate runoff uncertainty, with dry models exhibiting ~10%–15% higher uncertainty compared to warm models, which is further amplified when interacting with warm biases. However, from the mid-century onwards, the bias-adjustment approaches and climate change scenarios significantly shape runoff projection uncertainties under non-stationary conditions. These findings emphasise the potential of climate bias and runoff sensitivity-based GCM selection for reducing runoff uncertainty in near-future assessment (2030s). For mid-term and long-term runoff projections, addressing diverse climate biases through bias-adjustment approaches is more viable. This study offers critical insights to prioritise the development of a non-stationarity-based approach for reliable runoff projections in climate-sensitive regions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Climatology\",\"volume\":\"44 16\",\"pages\":\"5727-5744\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joc.8661\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Climatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joc.8661\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Climatology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joc.8661","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确的径流预测对于制定气候适应战略至关重要,但仍存在重大不确定性。限制这些不确定性的常用方法依赖于气候偏差和径流敏感性的平稳性,这可能不适用于气候敏感地区(如半干旱地区)。本研究调查了29个CMIP6模型的平稳性假设的有效性,包括不同的气候偏差(干暖、湿暖、干冷和湿冷),利用印度中部的半干旱地区作为试验台。基于水土评估工具(SWAT)模拟,在径流模拟链上对这一假设对径流预测不确定性的影响进行了全面评估,涵盖三个时间段(2030年代、2060年代和2090年代)。结果强调了未来情景下气候偏差和径流敏感性的非平稳性,挑战了常见不确定性约束方法的广泛适用性。此外,非平稳性对径流预测不确定性的影响受到gcm选择、预处理方法和气候变化情景的强烈影响。在21世纪30年代,gcm主导径流不确定性,与暖模式相比,干模式的不确定性高出10%-15%,当与暖偏作用时,这种不确定性进一步放大。然而,从本世纪中叶开始,在非平稳条件下,偏差调整方法和气候变化情景显著地影响了径流预测的不确定性。这些发现强调了气候偏差和基于径流敏感性的GCM选择在近未来评估(2030年代)中降低径流不确定性的潜力。对于中期和长期径流预测,通过偏差调整方法解决各种气候偏差更为可行。这项研究为优先发展基于非平稳性的方法以在气候敏感地区进行可靠的径流预测提供了重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implications of CMIP6 Models-Based Climate Biases and Runoff Sensitivity on Runoff Projection Uncertainties Over Central India

Accurate runoff projections are vital for developing climate adaptation strategies, yet significant uncertainties persist. The commonly employed approaches to constrain these uncertainties rely on the stationarity of climate biases and runoff sensitivity, which may not hold for climate-sensitive regions (e.g., semi-arid regions). This study investigates the validity of the stationarity assumption across 29 CMIP6 models, encompassing diverse climate biases (Dry Warm, Wet Warm, Dry Cold, and Wet Cold), utilising a semi-arid region in central India as a testbed. The implications of this assumption on runoff projection uncertainties were comprehensively assessed across the runoff modelling chain for three time periods (the 2030s, 2060s and 2090s) based on the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) simulations. The results highlight the non-stationary nature of climate biases and runoff sensitivity under future scenarios, challenging the widespread applicability of common uncertainty-constraining approaches. Moreover, the impact of non-stationarity on runoff projection uncertainty was found to be strongly influenced by the choice of GCMs, preprocessing methods and climate change scenarios. In the 2030s, GCMs dominate runoff uncertainty, with dry models exhibiting ~10%–15% higher uncertainty compared to warm models, which is further amplified when interacting with warm biases. However, from the mid-century onwards, the bias-adjustment approaches and climate change scenarios significantly shape runoff projection uncertainties under non-stationary conditions. These findings emphasise the potential of climate bias and runoff sensitivity-based GCM selection for reducing runoff uncertainty in near-future assessment (2030s). For mid-term and long-term runoff projections, addressing diverse climate biases through bias-adjustment approaches is more viable. This study offers critical insights to prioritise the development of a non-stationarity-based approach for reliable runoff projections in climate-sensitive regions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Climatology
International Journal of Climatology 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
417
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Climatology aims to span the well established but rapidly growing field of climatology, through the publication of research papers, short communications, major reviews of progress and reviews of new books and reports in the area of climate science. The Journal’s main role is to stimulate and report research in climatology, from the expansive fields of the atmospheric, biophysical, engineering and social sciences. Coverage includes: Climate system science; Local to global scale climate observations and modelling; Seasonal to interannual climate prediction; Climatic variability and climate change; Synoptic, dynamic and urban climatology, hydroclimatology, human bioclimatology, ecoclimatology, dendroclimatology, palaeoclimatology, marine climatology and atmosphere-ocean interactions; Application of climatological knowledge to environmental assessment and management and economic production; Climate and society interactions
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Time Series Clustering of Sea Surface Temperature in the Mediterranean and Black Sea Marine System An Elevated Influence of the Low-Latitude Drivers on the East Asian Winter Monsoon After Around 1990 Improvement in the Low Temperature Prediction Skill During Cold Winters Over the Mid–High Latitudes of Eurasia in CFSv2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1