伊斯兰恐惧症的概念和测量:一个系统的回顾

IF 1.8 4区 社会学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy Pub Date : 2024-09-28 DOI:10.1111/asap.12426
Ummul-Kiram Kathawalla, Quratulain Gulamhussein, Fei Bi Chan, Amy Riegelman, Moin Syed
{"title":"伊斯兰恐惧症的概念和测量:一个系统的回顾","authors":"Ummul-Kiram Kathawalla,&nbsp;Quratulain Gulamhussein,&nbsp;Fei Bi Chan,&nbsp;Amy Riegelman,&nbsp;Moin Syed","doi":"10.1111/asap.12426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The term Islamophobia is used in research studies; however, it is evident many researchers do not similarly use the term and, subsequently, measure the construct. We evaluate measures based upon their alignment with one first definition of Islamophobia that includes: (1) a perceived fear or threat of Islam/Muslims and (2) an engagement in prejudicial attitudes and/or discriminatory actions. We conducted a systematic literature search of 15 databases to identify Islamophobia-related measures used in the literature from 1992 to 2018 (updated 2022). The measures were reviewed to examine alignment with the definition of Islamophobia and their psychometric properties. We identified 12 validated measures of Islamophobia and provided an in-depth review of each measure. Additionally, we cataloged the 249 validated and nonvalidated measures of Islamophobia (<i>N</i> = 24), and the five remaining content areas—prejudicial attitudes (<i>N</i> = 80), discriminatory actions (<i>N</i> = 21), fear of Muslims (<i>N</i> = 23), anti-other group (<i>N</i> = 52), and experiences of discrimination for Muslims (<i>N</i> = 49) by validity, measure structure, and other criteria (Tables 1–12). This systematic review can assist researchers in identifying and selecting the most reliable and valid measure related to their definition of Islamophobia.</p>","PeriodicalId":46799,"journal":{"name":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","volume":"24 3","pages":"832-924"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/asap.12426","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptualization and measurement of Islamophobia: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Ummul-Kiram Kathawalla,&nbsp;Quratulain Gulamhussein,&nbsp;Fei Bi Chan,&nbsp;Amy Riegelman,&nbsp;Moin Syed\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/asap.12426\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The term Islamophobia is used in research studies; however, it is evident many researchers do not similarly use the term and, subsequently, measure the construct. We evaluate measures based upon their alignment with one first definition of Islamophobia that includes: (1) a perceived fear or threat of Islam/Muslims and (2) an engagement in prejudicial attitudes and/or discriminatory actions. We conducted a systematic literature search of 15 databases to identify Islamophobia-related measures used in the literature from 1992 to 2018 (updated 2022). The measures were reviewed to examine alignment with the definition of Islamophobia and their psychometric properties. We identified 12 validated measures of Islamophobia and provided an in-depth review of each measure. Additionally, we cataloged the 249 validated and nonvalidated measures of Islamophobia (<i>N</i> = 24), and the five remaining content areas—prejudicial attitudes (<i>N</i> = 80), discriminatory actions (<i>N</i> = 21), fear of Muslims (<i>N</i> = 23), anti-other group (<i>N</i> = 52), and experiences of discrimination for Muslims (<i>N</i> = 49) by validity, measure structure, and other criteria (Tables 1–12). This systematic review can assist researchers in identifying and selecting the most reliable and valid measure related to their definition of Islamophobia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy\",\"volume\":\"24 3\",\"pages\":\"832-924\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/asap.12426\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/asap.12426\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/asap.12426","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“伊斯兰恐惧症”一词用于研究;然而,很明显,许多研究人员并没有类似地使用这个术语,然后测量这个结构。我们根据其与伊斯兰恐惧症的第一种定义的一致性来评估措施,该定义包括:(1)对伊斯兰教/穆斯林的感知恐惧或威胁;(2)参与偏见态度和/或歧视性行为。我们对15个数据库进行了系统的文献检索,以确定1992年至2018年(更新于2022年)文献中使用的与伊斯兰恐惧症相关的措施。对这些措施进行了审查,以检查与伊斯兰恐惧症的定义及其心理测量特性的一致性。我们确定了12种有效的伊斯兰恐惧症测量方法,并对每一种测量方法进行了深入的回顾。此外,我们根据有效性、测量结构和其他标准(表1-12),对249项有效和未有效的伊斯兰恐惧症测量(N = 24)和其余五个内容领域——偏见态度(N = 80)、歧视行为(N = 21)、对穆斯林的恐惧(N = 23)、反其他群体(N = 52)和对穆斯林的歧视经历(N = 49)进行了编目。这个系统的回顾可以帮助研究人员识别和选择与他们对伊斯兰恐惧症的定义相关的最可靠和有效的测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Conceptualization and measurement of Islamophobia: A systematic review

The term Islamophobia is used in research studies; however, it is evident many researchers do not similarly use the term and, subsequently, measure the construct. We evaluate measures based upon their alignment with one first definition of Islamophobia that includes: (1) a perceived fear or threat of Islam/Muslims and (2) an engagement in prejudicial attitudes and/or discriminatory actions. We conducted a systematic literature search of 15 databases to identify Islamophobia-related measures used in the literature from 1992 to 2018 (updated 2022). The measures were reviewed to examine alignment with the definition of Islamophobia and their psychometric properties. We identified 12 validated measures of Islamophobia and provided an in-depth review of each measure. Additionally, we cataloged the 249 validated and nonvalidated measures of Islamophobia (N = 24), and the five remaining content areas—prejudicial attitudes (N = 80), discriminatory actions (N = 21), fear of Muslims (N = 23), anti-other group (N = 52), and experiences of discrimination for Muslims (N = 49) by validity, measure structure, and other criteria (Tables 1–12). This systematic review can assist researchers in identifying and selecting the most reliable and valid measure related to their definition of Islamophobia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Recent articles in ASAP have examined social psychological methods in the study of economic and social justice including ageism, heterosexism, racism, sexism, status quo bias and other forms of discrimination, social problems such as climate change, extremism, homelessness, inter-group conflict, natural disasters, poverty, and terrorism, and social ideals such as democracy, empowerment, equality, health, and trust.
期刊最新文献
LGBTQ+ conspiracy beliefs and collective actions: Factors and processes that (de)motivate support for LGBTQ+ equality Founder ownership and system-justifying beliefs in relation to perception toward Black Lives Matter and other social movements When longing goes wrong: Nostalgia can cause a preference for harmful aspects of the past Exploring disparities in research through the lens of epistemic exclusion: A focus on Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy Testing the interrelationship between area deprivation and ethnic disparities in sentencing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1