Jason McCartt, Samuel Wade Ross, Kyle W Cunningham, Huaping Wang, Leslie Sealey, Julia Brake, Ashley Christmas, Gaurav Sachdev, John Green, Bradley W Thomas
{"title":"14Fr Thal与28Fr管开胸术治疗外伤性血胸的随机非效性临床试验","authors":"Jason McCartt, Samuel Wade Ross, Kyle W Cunningham, Huaping Wang, Leslie Sealey, Julia Brake, Ashley Christmas, Gaurav Sachdev, John Green, Bradley W Thomas","doi":"10.1177/00031348241308907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The traditional treatment of traumatic hemothorax (HTX) is large bore chest tubes (CT) ≥28Fr. Recent evidence shows 14Fr pigtail catheters are as effective in drainage of HTX as larger CT. However, this has not been shown in 14Fr Thal tubes, a straight chest tube placed utilizing Seldinger technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single center, prospective randomized controlled trial was performed at an ACS verified Level 1 trauma center comparing 14Fr Thal CT (14CT) to 28Fr CT (28CT) between May 2017 and September 2021. The primary outcome was failure of drainage of hemothorax requiring additional intervention. Secondary outcomes included duration of chest tube placement, length of stay, tube-specific complications, and 90-day hospital readmission. Farrington-Manning approach was used for non-inferiority tests. Wilcoxon 2-samples test or <i>t</i> test was used for continuous variables, and Pearson chi-square or Fisher exact test was used for categorical variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>109 patients were included in the randomized trial. There were 54 patients in the 14CT cohort, and 55 patients in the 28CT cohort. The primary outcome of drainage failure was similar between groups (8.3% 14CT vs 3.9% 28CT). Using a 15% non-inferiority margin 14CT is non-inferior to 28CT. No differences were identified in secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>14Fr Thal tubes have similar efficacy in drainage of traumatic hemothorax when compared with 28Fr chest tubes with similar complication rates (NCT03167723).</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348241308907"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Randomized Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial of 14Fr Thal versus 28Fr Tube Thoracostomy for Traumatic Hemothorax.\",\"authors\":\"Jason McCartt, Samuel Wade Ross, Kyle W Cunningham, Huaping Wang, Leslie Sealey, Julia Brake, Ashley Christmas, Gaurav Sachdev, John Green, Bradley W Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00031348241308907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The traditional treatment of traumatic hemothorax (HTX) is large bore chest tubes (CT) ≥28Fr. Recent evidence shows 14Fr pigtail catheters are as effective in drainage of HTX as larger CT. However, this has not been shown in 14Fr Thal tubes, a straight chest tube placed utilizing Seldinger technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single center, prospective randomized controlled trial was performed at an ACS verified Level 1 trauma center comparing 14Fr Thal CT (14CT) to 28Fr CT (28CT) between May 2017 and September 2021. The primary outcome was failure of drainage of hemothorax requiring additional intervention. Secondary outcomes included duration of chest tube placement, length of stay, tube-specific complications, and 90-day hospital readmission. Farrington-Manning approach was used for non-inferiority tests. Wilcoxon 2-samples test or <i>t</i> test was used for continuous variables, and Pearson chi-square or Fisher exact test was used for categorical variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>109 patients were included in the randomized trial. There were 54 patients in the 14CT cohort, and 55 patients in the 28CT cohort. The primary outcome of drainage failure was similar between groups (8.3% 14CT vs 3.9% 28CT). Using a 15% non-inferiority margin 14CT is non-inferior to 28CT. No differences were identified in secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>14Fr Thal tubes have similar efficacy in drainage of traumatic hemothorax when compared with 28Fr chest tubes with similar complication rates (NCT03167723).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Surgeon\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"31348241308907\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Surgeon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241308907\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241308907","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Randomized Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial of 14Fr Thal versus 28Fr Tube Thoracostomy for Traumatic Hemothorax.
Background: The traditional treatment of traumatic hemothorax (HTX) is large bore chest tubes (CT) ≥28Fr. Recent evidence shows 14Fr pigtail catheters are as effective in drainage of HTX as larger CT. However, this has not been shown in 14Fr Thal tubes, a straight chest tube placed utilizing Seldinger technique.
Methods: A single center, prospective randomized controlled trial was performed at an ACS verified Level 1 trauma center comparing 14Fr Thal CT (14CT) to 28Fr CT (28CT) between May 2017 and September 2021. The primary outcome was failure of drainage of hemothorax requiring additional intervention. Secondary outcomes included duration of chest tube placement, length of stay, tube-specific complications, and 90-day hospital readmission. Farrington-Manning approach was used for non-inferiority tests. Wilcoxon 2-samples test or t test was used for continuous variables, and Pearson chi-square or Fisher exact test was used for categorical variables.
Results: 109 patients were included in the randomized trial. There were 54 patients in the 14CT cohort, and 55 patients in the 28CT cohort. The primary outcome of drainage failure was similar between groups (8.3% 14CT vs 3.9% 28CT). Using a 15% non-inferiority margin 14CT is non-inferior to 28CT. No differences were identified in secondary outcomes.
Conclusion: 14Fr Thal tubes have similar efficacy in drainage of traumatic hemothorax when compared with 28Fr chest tubes with similar complication rates (NCT03167723).
期刊介绍:
The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.