4% 四卡因凝胶和利多卡因-四卡因乳膏在减轻上眼睑眼睑成形术局麻药注射疼痛方面的效果:随机、单盲、对照试验。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY BMC Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1186/s12886-024-03799-7
Hetian Sun, Yingxue Mei, Li Zhu, Zijing Sun, Jiacheng Yan, Don O Kikkawa, Wei Lu
{"title":"4% 四卡因凝胶和利多卡因-四卡因乳膏在减轻上眼睑眼睑成形术局麻药注射疼痛方面的效果:随机、单盲、对照试验。","authors":"Hetian Sun, Yingxue Mei, Li Zhu, Zijing Sun, Jiacheng Yan, Don O Kikkawa, Wei Lu","doi":"10.1186/s12886-024-03799-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The injection of local anesthetics, an extremely painful procedure, leads to a reduction of patients' acceptance.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the efficacy and adverse reactions of 4% tetracaine gel (TG) and lidocaine-prilocaine cream (LPC) on reducing the local anesthetic injection pain for upper eyelid blepharoplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty participants were equally divided into three groups. Each patient in two treatment groups was assigned a pair of eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) and 4% TG, and the blank control group did not receive any topical anesthetic. The primary outcome was the pain score associated with anesthetic injection. The secondary outcomes included the local cutaneous reactions and eyelid edema in 24 h postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NRS score in the control group was 6.65 ± 1.60, in the 4% TG and EMLA sides of 5.75 ± 1.62 and 6.25 ± 1.48 in group A, without statistically significant (p = 0.334, 0.067, respectively). While in group B, the injection pain scores in 4% TG and EMLA sides were 4.65 ± 1.66 and 5.5 ± 1.73 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.031, respectively). A negative correlation was observed between age and LAIP (regression coefficient = -0.022), whereas gender had almost no impact (regression coefficient = 0.368). The administration duration of 4%TG and EMLA had no statistically significant effect on the cutaneous reactions observed on the patients' eyelids (p = 0.723, p = 0.507, respectively). However, the incidence of cutaneous reactions was 35% for EMLA, significantly lower than 72.5% for 4% TG (p < 0.001). The postoperative edema score of the control group was 1.5 (1.0,2.0), while in group A both 4% TG and EMLA sides scored 2.0 (1.0,2.0) and in group B they scored 2.0 (1.0,2.0) and 1.0 (1.0,2.0), respectively. Neither group showed significant differences in postoperative edema score compared to the control group, and there's also no significant difference was revealed comparing the 4% TG or EMLA side with the paired side in one group or the same side in the other group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In comparison to LPC, 4% TG showed a stronger anesthetic effect on reducing injection pain after 60-minute application. It also generally presented a higher frequency of cutaneous reactions but didn't affect the eyelid edema 24 h postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered at chictr.org (the first registration date is 03/04/2023, and the registration number is ChiCTR2300070153).</p>","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":"24 1","pages":"530"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11661032/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of 4% tetracaine gel and lidocaine-prilocaine cream in reducing local anesthetic injection pain in upper eyelid blepharoplasty: a randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Hetian Sun, Yingxue Mei, Li Zhu, Zijing Sun, Jiacheng Yan, Don O Kikkawa, Wei Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12886-024-03799-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The injection of local anesthetics, an extremely painful procedure, leads to a reduction of patients' acceptance.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the efficacy and adverse reactions of 4% tetracaine gel (TG) and lidocaine-prilocaine cream (LPC) on reducing the local anesthetic injection pain for upper eyelid blepharoplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty participants were equally divided into three groups. Each patient in two treatment groups was assigned a pair of eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) and 4% TG, and the blank control group did not receive any topical anesthetic. The primary outcome was the pain score associated with anesthetic injection. The secondary outcomes included the local cutaneous reactions and eyelid edema in 24 h postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NRS score in the control group was 6.65 ± 1.60, in the 4% TG and EMLA sides of 5.75 ± 1.62 and 6.25 ± 1.48 in group A, without statistically significant (p = 0.334, 0.067, respectively). While in group B, the injection pain scores in 4% TG and EMLA sides were 4.65 ± 1.66 and 5.5 ± 1.73 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.031, respectively). A negative correlation was observed between age and LAIP (regression coefficient = -0.022), whereas gender had almost no impact (regression coefficient = 0.368). The administration duration of 4%TG and EMLA had no statistically significant effect on the cutaneous reactions observed on the patients' eyelids (p = 0.723, p = 0.507, respectively). However, the incidence of cutaneous reactions was 35% for EMLA, significantly lower than 72.5% for 4% TG (p < 0.001). The postoperative edema score of the control group was 1.5 (1.0,2.0), while in group A both 4% TG and EMLA sides scored 2.0 (1.0,2.0) and in group B they scored 2.0 (1.0,2.0) and 1.0 (1.0,2.0), respectively. Neither group showed significant differences in postoperative edema score compared to the control group, and there's also no significant difference was revealed comparing the 4% TG or EMLA side with the paired side in one group or the same side in the other group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In comparison to LPC, 4% TG showed a stronger anesthetic effect on reducing injection pain after 60-minute application. It also generally presented a higher frequency of cutaneous reactions but didn't affect the eyelid edema 24 h postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered at chictr.org (the first registration date is 03/04/2023, and the registration number is ChiCTR2300070153).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"530\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11661032/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03799-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03799-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:局部麻醉剂的注射是一个非常痛苦的过程,导致患者的接受度降低。目的:探讨4%丁卡因凝胶(TG)与利多卡因-丙洛卡因乳膏(LPC)对减轻上睑成形术局麻注射疼痛的疗效及不良反应。方法:60名受试者平均分为3组。两组患者均给予局麻药(EMLA)和4% TG共熔混合物对,空白对照组不给予任何表面麻醉剂。主要结局是与麻醉注射相关的疼痛评分。术后24 h局部皮肤反应及眼睑水肿为次要观察指标。结果:对照组NRS评分为6.65±1.60,4% TG组为5.75±1.62,EMLA组为6.25±1.48,差异均无统计学意义(p分别为0.334、0.067)。B组4% TG和EMLA侧注射疼痛评分分别为4.65±1.66和5.5±1.73 (p)。结论:与LPC相比,4% TG在60min后对减轻注射疼痛的麻醉效果更强。术后24 h皮肤反应发生率普遍较高,但对眼睑水肿无影响。试验注册:本研究在chictr.org上注册(首次注册日期为03/04/2023,注册号为ChiCTR2300070153)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of 4% tetracaine gel and lidocaine-prilocaine cream in reducing local anesthetic injection pain in upper eyelid blepharoplasty: a randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial.

Background: The injection of local anesthetics, an extremely painful procedure, leads to a reduction of patients' acceptance.

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and adverse reactions of 4% tetracaine gel (TG) and lidocaine-prilocaine cream (LPC) on reducing the local anesthetic injection pain for upper eyelid blepharoplasty.

Methods: Sixty participants were equally divided into three groups. Each patient in two treatment groups was assigned a pair of eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) and 4% TG, and the blank control group did not receive any topical anesthetic. The primary outcome was the pain score associated with anesthetic injection. The secondary outcomes included the local cutaneous reactions and eyelid edema in 24 h postoperatively.

Results: The NRS score in the control group was 6.65 ± 1.60, in the 4% TG and EMLA sides of 5.75 ± 1.62 and 6.25 ± 1.48 in group A, without statistically significant (p = 0.334, 0.067, respectively). While in group B, the injection pain scores in 4% TG and EMLA sides were 4.65 ± 1.66 and 5.5 ± 1.73 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.031, respectively). A negative correlation was observed between age and LAIP (regression coefficient = -0.022), whereas gender had almost no impact (regression coefficient = 0.368). The administration duration of 4%TG and EMLA had no statistically significant effect on the cutaneous reactions observed on the patients' eyelids (p = 0.723, p = 0.507, respectively). However, the incidence of cutaneous reactions was 35% for EMLA, significantly lower than 72.5% for 4% TG (p < 0.001). The postoperative edema score of the control group was 1.5 (1.0,2.0), while in group A both 4% TG and EMLA sides scored 2.0 (1.0,2.0) and in group B they scored 2.0 (1.0,2.0) and 1.0 (1.0,2.0), respectively. Neither group showed significant differences in postoperative edema score compared to the control group, and there's also no significant difference was revealed comparing the 4% TG or EMLA side with the paired side in one group or the same side in the other group.

Conclusion: In comparison to LPC, 4% TG showed a stronger anesthetic effect on reducing injection pain after 60-minute application. It also generally presented a higher frequency of cutaneous reactions but didn't affect the eyelid edema 24 h postoperatively.

Trial registration: This study was registered at chictr.org (the first registration date is 03/04/2023, and the registration number is ChiCTR2300070153).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Ophthalmology
BMC Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Ophthalmology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of eye disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Comparing structural and vascular parameters between advanced pseudoexfoliation glaucoma and primary open angle glaucoma using optical coherence tomography angiography. Phaeoisaria sp. fungal keratitis resembling corneal rust residue: a case report. Quantitative evaluation of the wide-field fundus photographs in eyes with severe stage 3 and stage 4A retinopathy of prematurity. Incidence of ophthalmic manifestations in congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV). Increased aqueous humor levels of endothelin-1 in patients with open angle glaucoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1