阿片类药物使用障碍退伍军人治疗方式的重要性:对虚拟护理的影响。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Community Mental Health Journal Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1007/s10597-024-01428-7
Sarah Meshberg-Cohen, Ashley M Schnakenberg Martin, Noah R Wolkowicz, Georgina M Gross, Jason C DeViva
{"title":"阿片类药物使用障碍退伍军人治疗方式的重要性:对虚拟护理的影响。","authors":"Sarah Meshberg-Cohen, Ashley M Schnakenberg Martin, Noah R Wolkowicz, Georgina M Gross, Jason C DeViva","doi":"10.1007/s10597-024-01428-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined treatment utilization across in-person and virtual treatment modalities in veterans who were on medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD; N = 139). Treatment records for veterans in addiction treatment on MOUD were examined for 3-months prior to telehealth conversions (\"Pre-Telehealth,\" 12/02/2019-03/14/2020), 3-months during the initial telehealth transition (\"Telehealth,\" 03/15/2020-06/30/2020) and 3-months during post-telehealth transition (\"Re-Entry,\" 07/01/2020-10/01/2020). Analyses examined the relationship between treatment modality and demographic features, psychiatric comorbidities, treatment engagement, and illness severity as measured by psychiatric emergency room (PER) utilization. Results demonstrated that modality was not associated with PER utilization. Past-year PER visits, alcohol use disorder (AUD), and psychotic disorders were associated with PER utilization during Telehealth, while AUD was associated with Re-Entry PER utilization. Given the likelihood of virtual treatment in the future, frequent in-person visits may not be necessary for MOUD; however, individuals with comorbid AUD and psychotic disorders may need additional support to prevent emergency care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"899-906"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Importance of Treatment Modality in Veterans with Opioid Use Disorder: Implications for Virtual Care.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Meshberg-Cohen, Ashley M Schnakenberg Martin, Noah R Wolkowicz, Georgina M Gross, Jason C DeViva\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10597-024-01428-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study examined treatment utilization across in-person and virtual treatment modalities in veterans who were on medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD; N = 139). Treatment records for veterans in addiction treatment on MOUD were examined for 3-months prior to telehealth conversions (\\\"Pre-Telehealth,\\\" 12/02/2019-03/14/2020), 3-months during the initial telehealth transition (\\\"Telehealth,\\\" 03/15/2020-06/30/2020) and 3-months during post-telehealth transition (\\\"Re-Entry,\\\" 07/01/2020-10/01/2020). Analyses examined the relationship between treatment modality and demographic features, psychiatric comorbidities, treatment engagement, and illness severity as measured by psychiatric emergency room (PER) utilization. Results demonstrated that modality was not associated with PER utilization. Past-year PER visits, alcohol use disorder (AUD), and psychotic disorders were associated with PER utilization during Telehealth, while AUD was associated with Re-Entry PER utilization. Given the likelihood of virtual treatment in the future, frequent in-person visits may not be necessary for MOUD; however, individuals with comorbid AUD and psychotic disorders may need additional support to prevent emergency care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Community Mental Health Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"899-906\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Community Mental Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-024-01428-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Mental Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-024-01428-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了服用阿片类药物使用障碍药物的退伍军人的面对面和虚拟治疗方式的治疗利用率(mod;n = 139)。在远程医疗转换前的3个月(“前远程医疗”,2019年2月12日- 2020年3月14日)、初始远程医疗转换期间的3个月(“远程医疗”,2020年3月15日- 2020年6月30日)和远程医疗转换后的3个月(“重新进入”,2020年7月1日- 2020年10月1日),对在mod上进行成瘾治疗的退伍军人的治疗记录进行了检查。分析检查了治疗方式与人口统计学特征、精神合并症、治疗参与和精神科急诊室(PER)使用率测量的疾病严重程度之间的关系。结果表明,方式与PER利用率无关。过去一年的PER访问、酒精使用障碍(AUD)和精神障碍与远程医疗期间PER利用率相关,而AUD与再次入境PER利用率相关。考虑到未来虚拟治疗的可能性,频繁的亲自就诊可能对mod来说是不必要的;然而,患有AUD合并症和精神障碍的个体可能需要额外的支持来防止紧急护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Importance of Treatment Modality in Veterans with Opioid Use Disorder: Implications for Virtual Care.

This study examined treatment utilization across in-person and virtual treatment modalities in veterans who were on medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD; N = 139). Treatment records for veterans in addiction treatment on MOUD were examined for 3-months prior to telehealth conversions ("Pre-Telehealth," 12/02/2019-03/14/2020), 3-months during the initial telehealth transition ("Telehealth," 03/15/2020-06/30/2020) and 3-months during post-telehealth transition ("Re-Entry," 07/01/2020-10/01/2020). Analyses examined the relationship between treatment modality and demographic features, psychiatric comorbidities, treatment engagement, and illness severity as measured by psychiatric emergency room (PER) utilization. Results demonstrated that modality was not associated with PER utilization. Past-year PER visits, alcohol use disorder (AUD), and psychotic disorders were associated with PER utilization during Telehealth, while AUD was associated with Re-Entry PER utilization. Given the likelihood of virtual treatment in the future, frequent in-person visits may not be necessary for MOUD; however, individuals with comorbid AUD and psychotic disorders may need additional support to prevent emergency care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Community Mental Health Journal focuses on the needs of people experiencing serious forms of psychological distress, as well as the structures established to address those needs. Areas of particular interest include critical examination of current paradigms of diagnosis and treatment, socio-structural determinants of mental health, social hierarchies within the public mental health systems, and the intersection of public mental health programs and social/racial justice and health equity. While this is the journal of the American Association for Community Psychiatry, we welcome manuscripts reflecting research from a range of disciplines on recovery-oriented services, public health policy, clinical delivery systems, advocacy, and emerging and innovative practices.
期刊最新文献
Self-disclosure to Peers and Changes in Personal Recovery in Community-dwelling People with Mental Disorders: A One-year Longitudinal Study. Association Between Patient Health Questionnaire-4 Composite Score and Depression Diagnoses in a Free Clinic Setting: Pooled Cross-sectional Study. A Scoping Review of Technology/Digital Support Tools for Informal Mental Health Carers: Impacts on Well being and Experience. Uncertainty of Fit - Serving People with Borderline Personality Disorder on an Assertive Community Treatment Team Setting: Experiences and Perspectives of Clinicians from a Flexible ACT Team. The Impact of Government-Funded Brief Psychological Interventions on Mental Health: A Longitudinal Evaluation of the Italian "Psychological Bonus" Policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1