对于插入性跟腱病患者,冲击波治疗是否能在12周内改善疼痛和功能?一项随机对照试验。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1177/02692155241295683
Baraa Alsulaimani, Luke Perraton, Patrick Vallance, Tim Powers, Peter Malliaras
{"title":"对于插入性跟腱病患者,冲击波治疗是否能在12周内改善疼痛和功能?一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Baraa Alsulaimani, Luke Perraton, Patrick Vallance, Tim Powers, Peter Malliaras","doi":"10.1177/02692155241295683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the efficacy of adding radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy or sham to exercise for people with insertional Achilles tendinopathy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A two-armed, parallel-group, explanatory, single-centre, randomised controlled trial within a superiority framework.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Private clinic.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>People diagnosed with insertional Achilles tendinopathy who were over 18 years old with a symptom duration of greater than 3 months.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>A total of 76 people were randomly assigned (one-to-one ratio) to receive three sessions of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy or sham to the affected side (or most affected side if bilateral). All participants received identical education and exercise.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles questionnaire. Measures were recorded at baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 12 weeks, the questionnaire data were available for 37 people (96%) in the radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy group and 36 people (95%) in the sham group. For the primary outcome, we found no evidence for between-group differences at 6 (3, 95% confidence interval -4.6-10.5) or 12 weeks (4.6, 95% confidence interval -2.5-11.6). There was also no evidence for a between-group difference for any secondary outcome measures at either 6 or 12 weeks (<i>p</i> > .05). No serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The addition of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy to exercise and education did not lead to improvements in pain, function or other outcomes compared to sham at 6 or 12 weeks among people with insertional Achilles tendinopathy.<b>ANZCTR Reg No:</b> ACTRN12620000035921.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"2692155241295683"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does shockwave therapy lead to better pain and function than sham over 12 weeks in people with insertional Achilles tendinopathy? A randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Baraa Alsulaimani, Luke Perraton, Patrick Vallance, Tim Powers, Peter Malliaras\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692155241295683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the efficacy of adding radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy or sham to exercise for people with insertional Achilles tendinopathy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A two-armed, parallel-group, explanatory, single-centre, randomised controlled trial within a superiority framework.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Private clinic.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>People diagnosed with insertional Achilles tendinopathy who were over 18 years old with a symptom duration of greater than 3 months.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>A total of 76 people were randomly assigned (one-to-one ratio) to receive three sessions of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy or sham to the affected side (or most affected side if bilateral). All participants received identical education and exercise.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles questionnaire. Measures were recorded at baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 12 weeks, the questionnaire data were available for 37 people (96%) in the radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy group and 36 people (95%) in the sham group. For the primary outcome, we found no evidence for between-group differences at 6 (3, 95% confidence interval -4.6-10.5) or 12 weeks (4.6, 95% confidence interval -2.5-11.6). There was also no evidence for a between-group difference for any secondary outcome measures at either 6 or 12 weeks (<i>p</i> > .05). No serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The addition of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy to exercise and education did not lead to improvements in pain, function or other outcomes compared to sham at 6 or 12 weeks among people with insertional Achilles tendinopathy.<b>ANZCTR Reg No:</b> ACTRN12620000035921.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2692155241295683\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241295683\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241295683","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨桡骨体外冲击波加假体运动治疗跟腱插入性病变的疗效。设计:在优势框架内进行双臂、平行组、解释性、单中心、随机对照试验。环境:私人诊所。参与者:被诊断为插入性跟腱病的人,年龄超过18岁,症状持续时间超过3个月。干预:总共76人被随机分配(一对一的比例)接受三个疗程的桡骨体外冲击波治疗或假手术(如果是双侧,则是最受影响的一侧)。所有参与者都接受了相同的教育和锻炼。结果测量:主要结果是维多利亚运动评估研究所的跟腱问卷。在基线、6周和12周时记录测量结果。结果:12周时,桡骨体外冲击波治疗组37例(96%)和假手术组36例(95%)的问卷数据可用。对于主要结局,我们在6周(3周,95%置信区间-4.6-10.5)或12周(4.6周,95%置信区间-2.5-11.6)时没有发现组间差异的证据。在6周或12周时,也没有证据表明任何次要结局指标在组间存在差异(p < 0.05)。无严重不良事件报告。结论:与假治疗相比,在6周或12周时,与运动和教育相结合的桡骨体外冲击波治疗并没有改善插入性跟腱病患者的疼痛、功能或其他结果。ANZCTR注册号:ACTRN12620000035921。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does shockwave therapy lead to better pain and function than sham over 12 weeks in people with insertional Achilles tendinopathy? A randomised controlled trial.

Objectives: To investigate the efficacy of adding radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy or sham to exercise for people with insertional Achilles tendinopathy.

Design: A two-armed, parallel-group, explanatory, single-centre, randomised controlled trial within a superiority framework.

Setting: Private clinic.

Participants: People diagnosed with insertional Achilles tendinopathy who were over 18 years old with a symptom duration of greater than 3 months.

Intervention: A total of 76 people were randomly assigned (one-to-one ratio) to receive three sessions of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy or sham to the affected side (or most affected side if bilateral). All participants received identical education and exercise.

Outcome measures: The primary outcome was the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles questionnaire. Measures were recorded at baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks.

Results: At 12 weeks, the questionnaire data were available for 37 people (96%) in the radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy group and 36 people (95%) in the sham group. For the primary outcome, we found no evidence for between-group differences at 6 (3, 95% confidence interval -4.6-10.5) or 12 weeks (4.6, 95% confidence interval -2.5-11.6). There was also no evidence for a between-group difference for any secondary outcome measures at either 6 or 12 weeks (p > .05). No serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusion: The addition of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy to exercise and education did not lead to improvements in pain, function or other outcomes compared to sham at 6 or 12 weeks among people with insertional Achilles tendinopathy.ANZCTR Reg No: ACTRN12620000035921.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
期刊最新文献
Effects of Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire thresholds and gender on spatiotemporal parameters during walking in patients with chronic low back pain. Aquatic exercise interventions in the treatment of musculoskeletal upper extremity disorders: A scoping review. Coming to my own wisdom: A qualitative study exploring the role of the Take Charge intervention in stroke recovery. Effects of a home-based pelvic floor muscle training with and without action and cue observation on urinary incontinence after prostatectomy: A randomized controlled trial. The 9-item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-9) has adequate measurement properties in patients with chronic low back pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1