设计,验证和实施多重数字PCR分析,同时定量多个目标。

IF 2 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Letters in Applied Microbiology Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1093/lambio/ovae137
Jolinda de Korne-Elenbaas, Lea Caduff, Adrian Lison, Rachel McLeod, Melissa Pitton, Charles Gan, Timothy R Julian
{"title":"设计,验证和实施多重数字PCR分析,同时定量多个目标。","authors":"Jolinda de Korne-Elenbaas, Lea Caduff, Adrian Lison, Rachel McLeod, Melissa Pitton, Charles Gan, Timothy R Julian","doi":"10.1093/lambio/ovae137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and digital PCR (dPCR) are applied for quantifying molecular targets in disease diagnostics, pathogen detection, and ecological monitoring. Uptake of dPCR is increasing due to its higher quantification accuracy relative to qPCR, which stems from its independence from standard curves and its increased resistance to PCR inhibitors. Throughput can be increased through multiplexing, which allows simultaneous quantification of multiple targets. However, multiplexing with dPCR faces unique challenges relative to qPCR. Here, we describe the three-phase development process of non-competing multiplex dPCR assays using target-specific fluorescently labeled hydrolysis probes. We highlight common challenges encountered, along with recommended solutions. Phase 1: In silico assay design; target-specific primers and probes are selected or designed, potential issues with primer and probe interactions are identified, and fluorophores and quenchers are chosen based on dPCR instrumentation. Phase 2: Wet-lab validation; assays are benchmarked using positive controls. Insufficient performance leads to assay redesign, as needed. Phase 3: Assay implementation; assay specificity and sensitivity are validated on relevant sample matrices. Finally, we provide recommendations on the future design and standardization of multiplexed dPCR assays, highlighting the need for better in silico predictions of assay performance, standardizing positive controls, and automating partition classification systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":17962,"journal":{"name":"Letters in Applied Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design, validation, and implementation of multiplex digital PCR assays for simultaneous quantification of multiple targets.\",\"authors\":\"Jolinda de Korne-Elenbaas, Lea Caduff, Adrian Lison, Rachel McLeod, Melissa Pitton, Charles Gan, Timothy R Julian\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/lambio/ovae137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and digital PCR (dPCR) are applied for quantifying molecular targets in disease diagnostics, pathogen detection, and ecological monitoring. Uptake of dPCR is increasing due to its higher quantification accuracy relative to qPCR, which stems from its independence from standard curves and its increased resistance to PCR inhibitors. Throughput can be increased through multiplexing, which allows simultaneous quantification of multiple targets. However, multiplexing with dPCR faces unique challenges relative to qPCR. Here, we describe the three-phase development process of non-competing multiplex dPCR assays using target-specific fluorescently labeled hydrolysis probes. We highlight common challenges encountered, along with recommended solutions. Phase 1: In silico assay design; target-specific primers and probes are selected or designed, potential issues with primer and probe interactions are identified, and fluorophores and quenchers are chosen based on dPCR instrumentation. Phase 2: Wet-lab validation; assays are benchmarked using positive controls. Insufficient performance leads to assay redesign, as needed. Phase 3: Assay implementation; assay specificity and sensitivity are validated on relevant sample matrices. Finally, we provide recommendations on the future design and standardization of multiplexed dPCR assays, highlighting the need for better in silico predictions of assay performance, standardizing positive controls, and automating partition classification systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Letters in Applied Microbiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Letters in Applied Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/lambio/ovae137\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Letters in Applied Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/lambio/ovae137","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

定量PCR (qPCR)和数字PCR (dPCR)在疾病诊断、病原体检测和生态监测中应用于分子靶点的定量分析。与qPCR相比,dPCR的定量准确性更高,这是因为它不依赖于标准曲线,而且对PCR抑制剂的抗性增强。吞吐量可以通过多路复用增加,这允许同时量化多个目标。然而,与qPCR相比,dPCR的多路复用面临着独特的挑战。在这里,我们描述了使用目标特异性荧光标记水解探针的非竞争多重dPCR检测的三个阶段的开发过程。我们强调遇到的共同挑战,以及建议的解决方案。第一阶段:硅分析设计;选择或设计目标特异性引物和探针,确定引物和探针相互作用的潜在问题,并根据dPCR仪器选择荧光团和猝灭剂。第二阶段:湿室验证;检测采用阳性对照作为基准。性能不足会导致根据需要重新设计检测方法。第三阶段:检测实施;在相关样品基质上验证了检测的特异性和敏感性。最后,我们对多重dPCR分析的未来设计和标准化提出了建议,强调需要更好的分析性能的计算机预测,标准化阳性对照和自动化分区分类系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Design, validation, and implementation of multiplex digital PCR assays for simultaneous quantification of multiple targets.

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and digital PCR (dPCR) are applied for quantifying molecular targets in disease diagnostics, pathogen detection, and ecological monitoring. Uptake of dPCR is increasing due to its higher quantification accuracy relative to qPCR, which stems from its independence from standard curves and its increased resistance to PCR inhibitors. Throughput can be increased through multiplexing, which allows simultaneous quantification of multiple targets. However, multiplexing with dPCR faces unique challenges relative to qPCR. Here, we describe the three-phase development process of non-competing multiplex dPCR assays using target-specific fluorescently labeled hydrolysis probes. We highlight common challenges encountered, along with recommended solutions. Phase 1: In silico assay design; target-specific primers and probes are selected or designed, potential issues with primer and probe interactions are identified, and fluorophores and quenchers are chosen based on dPCR instrumentation. Phase 2: Wet-lab validation; assays are benchmarked using positive controls. Insufficient performance leads to assay redesign, as needed. Phase 3: Assay implementation; assay specificity and sensitivity are validated on relevant sample matrices. Finally, we provide recommendations on the future design and standardization of multiplexed dPCR assays, highlighting the need for better in silico predictions of assay performance, standardizing positive controls, and automating partition classification systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Letters in Applied Microbiology
Letters in Applied Microbiology 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
225
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of & Letters in Applied Microbiology are two of the flagship research journals of the Society for Applied Microbiology (SfAM). For more than 75 years they have been publishing top quality research and reviews in the broad field of applied microbiology. The journals are provided to all SfAM members as well as having a global online readership totalling more than 500,000 downloads per year in more than 200 countries. Submitting authors can expect fast decision and publication times, averaging 33 days to first decision and 34 days from acceptance to online publication. There are no page charges.
期刊最新文献
The relationship between pathogenic bacteria and different stages of colorectal cancer. The characterization of Herbaspirillum huttiense isolated from a uremic patient: virulence and antimicrobial efficacy in the Galleria mellonella model. Common mycorrhizal networks enhance growth and nutrient uptake in non-mycorrhizal Chenopodium album via Parthenium hysterophorus. In-silico study of molecular adaptations in halophilic Cas9. A review of the environmental spread of Salmonella enterica serovars through water in Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1