PICU 病床旁的家属与儿科患者谵妄:2014-2017年单中心队列回顾性分析。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1097/PCC.0000000000003678
Mallory B Smith, Elizabeth Y Killien, R Scott Watson, Leslie A Dervan
{"title":"PICU 病床旁的家属与儿科患者谵妄:2014-2017年单中心队列回顾性分析。","authors":"Mallory B Smith, Elizabeth Y Killien, R Scott Watson, Leslie A Dervan","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the association between family presence at the PICU bedside and daily positive delirium screening scores.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary children's hospital PICU.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Children younger than 18 years old with PICU length of stay greater than 36 hours enrolled in the Seattle Children's Hospital Outcomes Assessment Program from 2014 to 2017.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>In the dataset, delirium screening had been performed bid using the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium, with scores greater than or equal to 9 classified as positive. Family presence was documented every 2 hours. Among 224 patients, 55% (n = 124/224) had positive delirium screening on 44% (n = 408/930) of PICU days. Family presence at the bedside during PICU stay (< 90% compared with ≥ 90%) was associated with higher proportion of ever (as opposed to never) being screened positive for delirium (26/37 vs. 98/187; difference, 17.9% [95% CI, 0.4-32.1%]; p = 0.046). On univariate analysis, each additional decile of increasing family presence was associated with lower odds of positive delirium screening on the same day (odds ratio [OR], 0.87 [95% CI, 0.77-0.97]) and subsequent day (OR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.75-0.94]). On multivariable analysis after adjustments, including baseline Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC), higher family presence was associated with lower odds of subsequent-day positive delirium screening (OR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.81-0.98]). Among patients with PCPC less than or equal to 2, each additional decile of increasing family presence was independently associated with lower odds of both same-day (OR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.81-0.99]) and subsequent-day (OR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.76-0.95]) positive delirium screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our 2014-2017 retrospective cohort, greater family presence was associated with lower odds of delirium in PICU patients. Family presence is a modifiable factor that may mitigate the burden of pediatric delirium, and future studies should explore barriers and facilitators of family presence in the PICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Family Presence at the PICU Bedside and Pediatric Patient Delirium: Retrospective Analysis of a Single-Center Cohort, 2014-2017.\",\"authors\":\"Mallory B Smith, Elizabeth Y Killien, R Scott Watson, Leslie A Dervan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003678\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the association between family presence at the PICU bedside and daily positive delirium screening scores.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary children's hospital PICU.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Children younger than 18 years old with PICU length of stay greater than 36 hours enrolled in the Seattle Children's Hospital Outcomes Assessment Program from 2014 to 2017.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>In the dataset, delirium screening had been performed bid using the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium, with scores greater than or equal to 9 classified as positive. Family presence was documented every 2 hours. Among 224 patients, 55% (n = 124/224) had positive delirium screening on 44% (n = 408/930) of PICU days. Family presence at the bedside during PICU stay (< 90% compared with ≥ 90%) was associated with higher proportion of ever (as opposed to never) being screened positive for delirium (26/37 vs. 98/187; difference, 17.9% [95% CI, 0.4-32.1%]; p = 0.046). On univariate analysis, each additional decile of increasing family presence was associated with lower odds of positive delirium screening on the same day (odds ratio [OR], 0.87 [95% CI, 0.77-0.97]) and subsequent day (OR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.75-0.94]). On multivariable analysis after adjustments, including baseline Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC), higher family presence was associated with lower odds of subsequent-day positive delirium screening (OR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.81-0.98]). Among patients with PCPC less than or equal to 2, each additional decile of increasing family presence was independently associated with lower odds of both same-day (OR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.81-0.99]) and subsequent-day (OR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.76-0.95]) positive delirium screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our 2014-2017 retrospective cohort, greater family presence was associated with lower odds of delirium in PICU patients. Family presence is a modifiable factor that may mitigate the burden of pediatric delirium, and future studies should explore barriers and facilitators of family presence in the PICU.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003678\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003678","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨家庭在PICU床边的存在与每日谵妄筛查阳性评分之间的关系。设计:回顾性队列研究。工作地点:三级儿童医院PICU。研究对象:2014年至2017年在西雅图儿童医院结局评估项目登记的PICU住院时间大于36小时的18岁以下儿童。干预措施:没有。测量和主要结果:在数据集中,使用康奈尔儿童谵妄评估进行了谵妄筛查,得分大于或等于9分为阳性。每2小时记录一次家庭成员的存在。224例患者中,44% (n = 408/930) PICU天数中,55% (n = 124/224)患者谵妄筛查呈阳性。PICU住院期间,家人在床边陪伴(< 90%与≥90%相比)与曾经(相对于从未)被筛查为谵妄阳性的比例较高相关(26/37 vs 98/187;差异为17.9% [95% CI, 0.4-32.1%];P = 0.046)。在单因素分析中,每增加一个十分位数的家庭存在与当天和次日谵妄筛查阳性的几率较低相关(比值比[OR], 0.87 [95% CI, 0.77-0.97])。在调整后的多变量分析中,包括基线儿童脑功能分类(PCPC),较高的家庭存在与随后一天谵妄筛查阳性的几率较低相关(OR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.81-0.98])。在PCPC小于或等于2的患者中,每增加一个十分位数的家庭存在与当天(or, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.81-0.99])和随后一天(or, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.76-0.95])谵妄筛查阳性的几率较低独立相关。结论:在我们2014-2017年的回顾性队列研究中,PICU患者出现谵妄的几率较低,家庭成员较多。家庭存在是一个可改变的因素,可以减轻儿童谵妄的负担,未来的研究应探讨PICU家庭存在的障碍和促进因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Family Presence at the PICU Bedside and Pediatric Patient Delirium: Retrospective Analysis of a Single-Center Cohort, 2014-2017.

Objectives: To examine the association between family presence at the PICU bedside and daily positive delirium screening scores.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Tertiary children's hospital PICU.

Subjects: Children younger than 18 years old with PICU length of stay greater than 36 hours enrolled in the Seattle Children's Hospital Outcomes Assessment Program from 2014 to 2017.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: In the dataset, delirium screening had been performed bid using the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium, with scores greater than or equal to 9 classified as positive. Family presence was documented every 2 hours. Among 224 patients, 55% (n = 124/224) had positive delirium screening on 44% (n = 408/930) of PICU days. Family presence at the bedside during PICU stay (< 90% compared with ≥ 90%) was associated with higher proportion of ever (as opposed to never) being screened positive for delirium (26/37 vs. 98/187; difference, 17.9% [95% CI, 0.4-32.1%]; p = 0.046). On univariate analysis, each additional decile of increasing family presence was associated with lower odds of positive delirium screening on the same day (odds ratio [OR], 0.87 [95% CI, 0.77-0.97]) and subsequent day (OR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.75-0.94]). On multivariable analysis after adjustments, including baseline Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC), higher family presence was associated with lower odds of subsequent-day positive delirium screening (OR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.81-0.98]). Among patients with PCPC less than or equal to 2, each additional decile of increasing family presence was independently associated with lower odds of both same-day (OR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.81-0.99]) and subsequent-day (OR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.76-0.95]) positive delirium screening.

Conclusions: In our 2014-2017 retrospective cohort, greater family presence was associated with lower odds of delirium in PICU patients. Family presence is a modifiable factor that may mitigate the burden of pediatric delirium, and future studies should explore barriers and facilitators of family presence in the PICU.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
991
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine is written for the entire critical care team: pediatricians, neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and others who deal with pediatric patients who are critically ill or injured. International in scope, with editorial board members and contributors from around the world, the Journal includes a full range of scientific content, including clinical articles, scientific investigations, solicited reviews, and abstracts from pediatric critical care meetings. Additionally, the Journal includes abstracts of selected articles published in Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, and Spanish translations - making news of advances in the field available to pediatric and neonatal intensive care practitioners worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes of Pediatric Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Using Dual-Lumen or Multisite Cannulation: Extracorporeal Life Support Database Study, 2000-2019. Pediatric Sepsis Phenotype in a Single-Center Cohort Covering 2010-2020: Evolution in Day 1-Day 3 Trajectory and Potential Prognostic Value. Sedation and Ventilator Weaning Bundle and Time to Extubation in Infants With Bronchiolitis: Secondary Analysis of the Sedation AND Weaning in Children (SANDWICH) Trial. A Music Producer's Perspective on the ICU: It Is All About Dynamic Range Compression. Extubation Practices and Outcomes During Pediatric Respiratory Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry, 2018-2022.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1