[德国精神病院根据监护法进行的非自愿治疗:一项在线调查的结果]。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Psychiatrische Praxis Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1055/a-2463-9581
Lukas Stürner, Tanja Henking, Georg Juckel, Jakov Gather, Tilman Steinert
{"title":"[德国精神病院根据监护法进行的非自愿治疗:一项在线调查的结果]。","authors":"Lukas Stürner, Tanja Henking, Georg Juckel, Jakov Gather, Tilman Steinert","doi":"10.1055/a-2463-9581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>To determine the circumstances of involuntary treatment under the German Civil Code (BGB) in psychiatric hospitals serving a catchment area.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Medical directors of psychiatric hospitals in Germany, including psychiatric departments at general hospitals and university clinics, were interviewed by means of an online survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate among the N=397 institutions addressed was 43%. Coercive treatment according to the German Civil Code (BGB), which must be requested by a guardian and approved by a court, is relatively rare and mainly involves the forced administration of psychotropic drugs. 90% of the responding institutions had carried out such coercive treatment within the last five years. Involvement in involuntary treatment carried out in somatic hospitals was rarely reported. For the most part, it is not systematically recorded.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Taking into account the lack of data, there is a need for a national register of such intervention, including involuntary treatment in somatic hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":20711,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrische Praxis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Involuntary treatment under guardianship law in psychiatric hospitals in Germany: results of an online survey].\",\"authors\":\"Lukas Stürner, Tanja Henking, Georg Juckel, Jakov Gather, Tilman Steinert\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2463-9581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>To determine the circumstances of involuntary treatment under the German Civil Code (BGB) in psychiatric hospitals serving a catchment area.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Medical directors of psychiatric hospitals in Germany, including psychiatric departments at general hospitals and university clinics, were interviewed by means of an online survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate among the N=397 institutions addressed was 43%. Coercive treatment according to the German Civil Code (BGB), which must be requested by a guardian and approved by a court, is relatively rare and mainly involves the forced administration of psychotropic drugs. 90% of the responding institutions had carried out such coercive treatment within the last five years. Involvement in involuntary treatment carried out in somatic hospitals was rarely reported. For the most part, it is not systematically recorded.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Taking into account the lack of data, there is a need for a national register of such intervention, including involuntary treatment in somatic hospitals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatrische Praxis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatrische Praxis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2463-9581\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatrische Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2463-9581","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的:确定在服务于集水区的精神病院根据《德国民法典》进行非自愿治疗的情况。方法:采用在线问卷调查的方式,对德国综合医院精神科和大学门诊等精神病院的主任医师进行访谈。结果:在调查的397所院校中,回复率为43%。根据德国民法典(BGB),强制治疗必须由监护人提出请求并经法院批准,这种情况相对较少,主要涉及强制使用精神药物。90%的答复机构在过去五年内实施过这种强制治疗。很少有报告说,有人参与了在躯体医院进行的非自愿治疗。在大多数情况下,没有系统地记录。结论:考虑到缺乏数据,有必要对这种干预措施,包括在躯体医院的非自愿治疗进行全国登记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Involuntary treatment under guardianship law in psychiatric hospitals in Germany: results of an online survey].

Aim of the study: To determine the circumstances of involuntary treatment under the German Civil Code (BGB) in psychiatric hospitals serving a catchment area.

Method: Medical directors of psychiatric hospitals in Germany, including psychiatric departments at general hospitals and university clinics, were interviewed by means of an online survey.

Results: The response rate among the N=397 institutions addressed was 43%. Coercive treatment according to the German Civil Code (BGB), which must be requested by a guardian and approved by a court, is relatively rare and mainly involves the forced administration of psychotropic drugs. 90% of the responding institutions had carried out such coercive treatment within the last five years. Involvement in involuntary treatment carried out in somatic hospitals was rarely reported. For the most part, it is not systematically recorded.

Conclusion: Taking into account the lack of data, there is a need for a national register of such intervention, including involuntary treatment in somatic hospitals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatrische Praxis
Psychiatrische Praxis PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: Sozialpsychiatrisch orientiert Aktuelle Originalarbeiten und fundierte Übersichten Pro-Kontra-Debatten zu Brennpunktthemen Informative Fallbeispiele Vorstellung internationaler Studien
期刊最新文献
[Safety-relevant components of inpatient equivalent home treatment - An investigation from the perspective of users]. [Sports Programs for Mental Illness: How Mental Health Professionales Can Provide Effective Support]. [Rapid Assessment of Future Pandemic Effects in Individuals with Severe Mental Illness: Can Ongoing Population-Representative Cohorts Contribute?] [The development and testing of a screening instrument for psychosocial needs assessment within acute psychiatric care]. [Mental illness in old age - why we need a new perspective].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1