肝硬化患者门静脉血栓形成管理的AGA临床实践更新:专家评论

IF 25.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1053/j.gastro.2024.10.038
Jessica P.E. Davis, Joseph K. Lim, Fadi F. Francis, Joseph Ahn
{"title":"肝硬化患者门静脉血栓形成管理的AGA临床实践更新:专家评论","authors":"Jessica P.E. Davis, Joseph K. Lim, Fadi F. Francis, Joseph Ahn","doi":"10.1053/j.gastro.2024.10.038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Description</h3>Portal vein thromboses (PVTs) are common in patients with cirrhosis and are associated with advanced portal hypertension and mortality. The treatment of PVTs remains a clinical challenge due to limited evidence and competing risks of PVT-associated complications vs bleeding risk of anticoagulation. Significant heterogeneity in PVT phenotype based on anatomic, host, and disease characteristics, and an emerging spectrum of therapeutic options further complicate PVT management. This Clinical Practice Update (CPU) aims to provide best practice advice for the evaluation and management of PVT in cirrhosis, including the role of direct oral anticoagulants and endovascular interventions.<h3>methods</h3>This expert review was commissioned and approved by the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute CPU Committee and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership, and underwent internal peer review by the CPU Committee and external peer review through standard procedures of <em>Gastroenterology.</em> These Best Practice Advice statements were drawn from a review of the published literature and from expert opinion. Because systematic reviews were not performed, these Best Practice Advice statements do not carry formal ratings regarding the quality of evidence or strength of the presented considerations.<strong>Best Practice Advice Statements</strong><h3>Best Practice Advice 1</h3>Asymptomatic patients with compensated cirrhosis do not require routine screening for PVT.<h3>Best Practice Advice 2</h3>Patients with cirrhosis with PVTs identified on Doppler ultrasound should undergo cross-sectional imaging with computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging to confirm the diagnosis, evaluate for malignancy, and document the degree of lumen occlusion, clot extent, and chronicity.<h3>Best Practice Advice 3</h3>Patients with cirrhosis and PVT do not require a hypercoagulable workup in the absence of additional thromboemboli or laboratory abnormalities or family history suggestive of thrombophilia.<h3>Best Practice Advice 4</h3>Patients with cirrhosis and PVT with evidence of intestinal ischemia require urgent anticoagulation to minimize ischemic injury. If available, these patients should be managed by a multidisciplinary team, including gastroenterology and hepatology, interventional radiology, hematology, and surgery.<h3>Best Practice Advice 5</h3>Consider observation, with repeat imaging every 3 months until clot regression, in patients with cirrhosis without intestinal ischemia and recent (&lt;6 months) thrombosis involving the intrahepatic portal vein branches or when there is &lt;50% occlusion of the main portal vein, splenic vein, or mesenteric veins.<h3>Best Practice Advice 6</h3>Anticoagulation should be considered in patients with cirrhosis without intestinal ischemia who develop recent (&lt;6 months) PVT that is &gt;50% occlusive or involves the main portal vein or mesenteric vessels. Patients who have increased benefit of recanalization include those with involvement of more than 1 vascular bed, those with thrombus progression, potential liver transplantation candidates, and those with inherited thrombophilia.<h3>Best Practice Advice 7</h3>Anticoagulation is not advised for patients with cirrhosis with chronic (&gt;6 months) PVT with complete occlusion with collateralization (cavernous transformation).<h3>Best Practice Advice 8</h3>Patients with cirrhosis and PVT warrant endoscopic variceal screening if they are not already on nonselective beta-blocker therapy for bleeding prophylaxis. Avoid delays in the initiation of anticoagulation for PVT, as this decreases the odds of portal vein recanalization.<h3>Best Practice Advice 9</h3>Vitamin K antagonists, low-molecular-weight heparin, and direct oral anticoagulants are all reasonable anticoagulant options for patients with cirrhosis and PVT. Decision making should be individualized and informed by patient preference and Child-Turcotte-Pugh class. Direct oral anticoagulants may be considered in patients with compensated Child-Turcotte-Pugh class A and Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B cirrhosis and offer convenience as their dosages are independent of international normalized ratio monitoring.<h3>Best Practice Advice 10</h3>Patients with cirrhosis on anticoagulation for PVT should have cross-sectional imaging every 3 months to assess response to treatment. If clot regresses, anticoagulation should be continued until transplantation or at least clot resolution in nontransplantation patients.<h3>Best Practice Advice 11</h3>Portal vein revascularization with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting may be considered for selected patients with cirrhosis and PVT who have additional indications for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting, such as those with refractory ascites or variceal bleeding. Portal vein revascularization with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting may also be considered for transplantation candidates if recanalization can facilitate the technical feasibility of transplantation.","PeriodicalId":12590,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AGA Clinical Practice Update on Management of Portal Vein Thrombosis in Patients With Cirrhosis: Expert Review\",\"authors\":\"Jessica P.E. Davis, Joseph K. Lim, Fadi F. Francis, Joseph Ahn\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.gastro.2024.10.038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Description</h3>Portal vein thromboses (PVTs) are common in patients with cirrhosis and are associated with advanced portal hypertension and mortality. The treatment of PVTs remains a clinical challenge due to limited evidence and competing risks of PVT-associated complications vs bleeding risk of anticoagulation. Significant heterogeneity in PVT phenotype based on anatomic, host, and disease characteristics, and an emerging spectrum of therapeutic options further complicate PVT management. This Clinical Practice Update (CPU) aims to provide best practice advice for the evaluation and management of PVT in cirrhosis, including the role of direct oral anticoagulants and endovascular interventions.<h3>methods</h3>This expert review was commissioned and approved by the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute CPU Committee and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership, and underwent internal peer review by the CPU Committee and external peer review through standard procedures of <em>Gastroenterology.</em> These Best Practice Advice statements were drawn from a review of the published literature and from expert opinion. Because systematic reviews were not performed, these Best Practice Advice statements do not carry formal ratings regarding the quality of evidence or strength of the presented considerations.<strong>Best Practice Advice Statements</strong><h3>Best Practice Advice 1</h3>Asymptomatic patients with compensated cirrhosis do not require routine screening for PVT.<h3>Best Practice Advice 2</h3>Patients with cirrhosis with PVTs identified on Doppler ultrasound should undergo cross-sectional imaging with computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging to confirm the diagnosis, evaluate for malignancy, and document the degree of lumen occlusion, clot extent, and chronicity.<h3>Best Practice Advice 3</h3>Patients with cirrhosis and PVT do not require a hypercoagulable workup in the absence of additional thromboemboli or laboratory abnormalities or family history suggestive of thrombophilia.<h3>Best Practice Advice 4</h3>Patients with cirrhosis and PVT with evidence of intestinal ischemia require urgent anticoagulation to minimize ischemic injury. If available, these patients should be managed by a multidisciplinary team, including gastroenterology and hepatology, interventional radiology, hematology, and surgery.<h3>Best Practice Advice 5</h3>Consider observation, with repeat imaging every 3 months until clot regression, in patients with cirrhosis without intestinal ischemia and recent (&lt;6 months) thrombosis involving the intrahepatic portal vein branches or when there is &lt;50% occlusion of the main portal vein, splenic vein, or mesenteric veins.<h3>Best Practice Advice 6</h3>Anticoagulation should be considered in patients with cirrhosis without intestinal ischemia who develop recent (&lt;6 months) PVT that is &gt;50% occlusive or involves the main portal vein or mesenteric vessels. Patients who have increased benefit of recanalization include those with involvement of more than 1 vascular bed, those with thrombus progression, potential liver transplantation candidates, and those with inherited thrombophilia.<h3>Best Practice Advice 7</h3>Anticoagulation is not advised for patients with cirrhosis with chronic (&gt;6 months) PVT with complete occlusion with collateralization (cavernous transformation).<h3>Best Practice Advice 8</h3>Patients with cirrhosis and PVT warrant endoscopic variceal screening if they are not already on nonselective beta-blocker therapy for bleeding prophylaxis. Avoid delays in the initiation of anticoagulation for PVT, as this decreases the odds of portal vein recanalization.<h3>Best Practice Advice 9</h3>Vitamin K antagonists, low-molecular-weight heparin, and direct oral anticoagulants are all reasonable anticoagulant options for patients with cirrhosis and PVT. Decision making should be individualized and informed by patient preference and Child-Turcotte-Pugh class. Direct oral anticoagulants may be considered in patients with compensated Child-Turcotte-Pugh class A and Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B cirrhosis and offer convenience as their dosages are independent of international normalized ratio monitoring.<h3>Best Practice Advice 10</h3>Patients with cirrhosis on anticoagulation for PVT should have cross-sectional imaging every 3 months to assess response to treatment. If clot regresses, anticoagulation should be continued until transplantation or at least clot resolution in nontransplantation patients.<h3>Best Practice Advice 11</h3>Portal vein revascularization with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting may be considered for selected patients with cirrhosis and PVT who have additional indications for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting, such as those with refractory ascites or variceal bleeding. Portal vein revascularization with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting may also be considered for transplantation candidates if recanalization can facilitate the technical feasibility of transplantation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":25.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2024.10.038\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2024.10.038","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

门静脉血栓形成(pvt)在肝硬化患者中很常见,并与晚期门静脉高压和死亡率相关。由于证据有限,以及pvt相关并发症与抗凝出血风险的竞争风险,pvt的治疗仍然是一个临床挑战。基于解剖、宿主和疾病特征的PVT表型的显著异质性,以及新出现的治疗选择谱,进一步使PVT管理复杂化。本临床实践更新(CPU)旨在为肝硬化PVT的评估和管理提供最佳实践建议,包括直接口服抗凝剂和血管内干预的作用。该专家评审由美国胃肠病学协会(AGA)研究所CPU委员会和AGA理事会委托并批准,旨在为AGA会员提供具有高度临床重要性的主题及时指导,并通过CPU委员会的内部同行评审和胃肠病学标准程序的外部同行评审。这些最佳实践建议声明来自对已发表文献的审查和专家意见。由于没有进行系统审查,这些最佳实践建议声明没有对证据的质量或所提出考虑因素的强度进行正式评级。最佳实践建议:无症状代偿性肝硬化患者不需要常规筛查pvt。最佳实践建议:多普勒超声检查发现肝硬化合并pvt的患者应进行计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像,以确认诊断,评估恶性肿瘤,并记录管腔闭塞程度,凝块范围和慢性。最佳实践建议3肝硬化和PVT患者在没有其他血栓栓塞或实验室异常或提示血栓性疾病家族史的情况下不需要进行高凝检查。有肠缺血证据的肝硬化和PVT患者需要紧急抗凝,以尽量减少缺血性损伤。如果可以的话,这些患者应该由一个多学科的团队来管理,包括胃肠病学和肝病学、介入放射学、血液学和外科。最佳实践建议5考虑观察,对于没有肠缺血的肝硬化患者和最近(6个月)血栓形成累及肝内门静脉分支或门静脉、脾静脉或肠系膜静脉阻塞50%的患者,每3个月重复成像一次,直至血栓消退。最佳实践建议6:对于近期(6个月)发生PVT 50%闭塞或累及门静脉或肠系膜血管的肝硬化无肠缺血患者,应考虑抗凝治疗。再通获益增加的患者包括:累及1个以上血管床的患者、有血栓进展的患者、潜在的肝移植候选者和遗传性血栓患者。最佳实践建议7:对于肝硬化合并慢性(6个月)PVT伴侧支完全闭塞(海绵样变性)的患者,不建议抗凝。最佳实践建议8肝硬化和PVT患者如果尚未接受非选择性β受体阻滞剂治疗以预防出血,则应进行内窥镜静脉曲张筛查。避免延迟抗凝治疗PVT,因为这样可以减少门静脉再通的几率。最佳实践建议:维生素K拮抗剂、低分子肝素和直接口服抗凝剂都是肝硬化和pvt患者合理的抗凝选择。决策应个体化,并根据患者偏好和child - turcot - pugh分级。代偿性child - turcote - pugh A级和child - turcote - pugh B级肝硬化患者可考虑直接口服抗凝剂,并且由于其剂量独立于国际标准化比例监测,提供了方便。最佳实践建议10肝硬化患者抗凝治疗PVT应每3个月进行横断面成像以评估治疗反应。如果凝块消退,抗凝治疗应持续至移植或至少非移植患者的凝块消退。最佳实践建议11对于有其他适应症的肝硬化和PVT患者,如难治性腹水或静脉曲张出血患者,可考虑门静脉重建术加经颈静脉肝内门静脉系统分流。 如果再通能够促进移植的技术可行性,也可以考虑采用经颈静脉肝内门静脉系统分流术进行门静脉重建术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AGA Clinical Practice Update on Management of Portal Vein Thrombosis in Patients With Cirrhosis: Expert Review

Description

Portal vein thromboses (PVTs) are common in patients with cirrhosis and are associated with advanced portal hypertension and mortality. The treatment of PVTs remains a clinical challenge due to limited evidence and competing risks of PVT-associated complications vs bleeding risk of anticoagulation. Significant heterogeneity in PVT phenotype based on anatomic, host, and disease characteristics, and an emerging spectrum of therapeutic options further complicate PVT management. This Clinical Practice Update (CPU) aims to provide best practice advice for the evaluation and management of PVT in cirrhosis, including the role of direct oral anticoagulants and endovascular interventions.

methods

This expert review was commissioned and approved by the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute CPU Committee and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership, and underwent internal peer review by the CPU Committee and external peer review through standard procedures of Gastroenterology. These Best Practice Advice statements were drawn from a review of the published literature and from expert opinion. Because systematic reviews were not performed, these Best Practice Advice statements do not carry formal ratings regarding the quality of evidence or strength of the presented considerations.Best Practice Advice Statements

Best Practice Advice 1

Asymptomatic patients with compensated cirrhosis do not require routine screening for PVT.

Best Practice Advice 2

Patients with cirrhosis with PVTs identified on Doppler ultrasound should undergo cross-sectional imaging with computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging to confirm the diagnosis, evaluate for malignancy, and document the degree of lumen occlusion, clot extent, and chronicity.

Best Practice Advice 3

Patients with cirrhosis and PVT do not require a hypercoagulable workup in the absence of additional thromboemboli or laboratory abnormalities or family history suggestive of thrombophilia.

Best Practice Advice 4

Patients with cirrhosis and PVT with evidence of intestinal ischemia require urgent anticoagulation to minimize ischemic injury. If available, these patients should be managed by a multidisciplinary team, including gastroenterology and hepatology, interventional radiology, hematology, and surgery.

Best Practice Advice 5

Consider observation, with repeat imaging every 3 months until clot regression, in patients with cirrhosis without intestinal ischemia and recent (<6 months) thrombosis involving the intrahepatic portal vein branches or when there is <50% occlusion of the main portal vein, splenic vein, or mesenteric veins.

Best Practice Advice 6

Anticoagulation should be considered in patients with cirrhosis without intestinal ischemia who develop recent (<6 months) PVT that is >50% occlusive or involves the main portal vein or mesenteric vessels. Patients who have increased benefit of recanalization include those with involvement of more than 1 vascular bed, those with thrombus progression, potential liver transplantation candidates, and those with inherited thrombophilia.

Best Practice Advice 7

Anticoagulation is not advised for patients with cirrhosis with chronic (>6 months) PVT with complete occlusion with collateralization (cavernous transformation).

Best Practice Advice 8

Patients with cirrhosis and PVT warrant endoscopic variceal screening if they are not already on nonselective beta-blocker therapy for bleeding prophylaxis. Avoid delays in the initiation of anticoagulation for PVT, as this decreases the odds of portal vein recanalization.

Best Practice Advice 9

Vitamin K antagonists, low-molecular-weight heparin, and direct oral anticoagulants are all reasonable anticoagulant options for patients with cirrhosis and PVT. Decision making should be individualized and informed by patient preference and Child-Turcotte-Pugh class. Direct oral anticoagulants may be considered in patients with compensated Child-Turcotte-Pugh class A and Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B cirrhosis and offer convenience as their dosages are independent of international normalized ratio monitoring.

Best Practice Advice 10

Patients with cirrhosis on anticoagulation for PVT should have cross-sectional imaging every 3 months to assess response to treatment. If clot regresses, anticoagulation should be continued until transplantation or at least clot resolution in nontransplantation patients.

Best Practice Advice 11

Portal vein revascularization with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting may be considered for selected patients with cirrhosis and PVT who have additional indications for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting, such as those with refractory ascites or variceal bleeding. Portal vein revascularization with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting may also be considered for transplantation candidates if recanalization can facilitate the technical feasibility of transplantation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gastroenterology
Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
45.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
4366
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Gastroenterology is the most prominent journal in the field of gastrointestinal disease. It is the flagship journal of the American Gastroenterological Association and delivers authoritative coverage of clinical, translational, and basic studies of all aspects of the digestive system, including the liver and pancreas, as well as nutrition. Some regular features of Gastroenterology include original research studies by leading authorities, comprehensive reviews and perspectives on important topics in adult and pediatric gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal also includes features such as editorials, correspondence, and commentaries, as well as special sections like "Mentoring, Education and Training Corner," "Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in GI," "Gastro Digest," "Gastro Curbside Consult," and "Gastro Grand Rounds." Gastroenterology also provides digital media materials such as videos and "GI Rapid Reel" animations. It is abstracted and indexed in various databases including Scopus, Biological Abstracts, Current Contents, Embase, Nutrition Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, Current Awareness in Biological Sciences, PubMed/Medline, and the Science Citation Index.
期刊最新文献
Reply to Takefuji POEM Progress and Unresolved Issues: A Decade of Expert Insights Comments on biologic ranking methodology used by the network meta-analysis to inform the 2024 ulcerative colitis guideline Burden and social determinants of health in pediatric IBD: Lessons learned from epidemiologic studies using health administrative data Enhancing Colorectal Cancer Subtyping: Addressing Limitations of L1-Penalized Estimation in Alternative Splicing Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1