护士主导干预对长期留置导尿患者生活质量的影响

Simran,  Seema,  Sushma, Vishnu Kumari, Meenakshi Agnihotri, Ravneet Kaur, Shanky Singh, Achala Agarwal, S. M. Ravi Mohan, Ashok Kumar
{"title":"护士主导干预对长期留置导尿患者生活质量的影响","authors":"Simran,&nbsp; Seema,&nbsp; Sushma,&nbsp;Vishnu Kumari,&nbsp;Meenakshi Agnihotri,&nbsp;Ravneet Kaur,&nbsp;Shanky Singh,&nbsp;Achala Agarwal,&nbsp;S. M. Ravi Mohan,&nbsp;Ashok Kumar","doi":"10.1111/ijun.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Long-term indwelling urinary catheters can lead to various health problems among patients resulting in impaired quality of life. Nurses are vital in providing access to resources, education, and support services, such as catheter care training, family support groups, and psychological counselling. They can empower patients with long-term indwelling urinary catheters to manage their condition effectively and enhance their quality of life. The objective of the study was to develop and implement booklet-based nurse-led intervention on patients with long-term indwelling urinary catheters and to assess the effectiveness of the urinary catheter care package (UCCP) on catheter care practices among caregivers and quality of life among patients. A randomised controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary care centre in Northern India. After obtaining informed consent from each participant, a total enumeration sampling technique was used for sampling ensuring the inclusion of all eligible participants followed by computer-generated day-wise randomization. Fifty participants (patient and caregiver dyad) in each group were selected. Participants in the intervention group were given booklet-based nurse-led intervention while standard care was given to participants in the control group. Data were collected using a validated semi-structured interview schedule consisting of (a) a socio-demographic profile of patients and their caregivers, (b) a clinical profile of patients, (c) an ICIQ-LTCQOL (Quality of life questionnaire) to assess the quality of life among patients, and (d) observation checklist to assess catheter care practices among caregivers. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 22.0 employing descriptive and inferential methods. The mean age of patients was 54.88 ± 20.14 years and 53.56 ± 18.93 years in the control and intervention group, respectively. Majority of patients were male, with 86.0% in the control group vs. 80.0% in the intervention group (<i>p</i> = 0.424). Majority of patients had urine retention as a chief complaint for long-term placement of indwelling urinary catheter in both the control group and intervention group, that is, 76.0% and 60.0%, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.086). At follow up, the mean catheter function and concern score was 19.44 ± 3.45 in the control group vs. 10.17 ± 2.08 in the intervention group (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). At follow up, the mean lifestyle impact score was 11.19 ± 2.36 in the control group vs. 8.30 ± 3.79 in the intervention group (<i>p</i> = &lt; 0.001). Mean pain, discomfort and soreness score was 1.47 ± 0.65 in the control and 0.67 ± 0.59 in the intervention group at follow-up (<i>p</i> = 0.001). There was significant decrement in the mean catheter function and concern score, mean lifestyle impact score, and mean pain, discomfort and soreness score among the intervention group as compared to the control group at follow up (<i>p</i> = &lt; 0.001). At follow up, the mean overall QoL score was 33.53 ± 5.04 in control and 19.73 ± 3.98 in the intervention group. There was significant improvement in overall QoL among the intervention group as compared to the control group at follow-up (<i>p</i> = &lt; 0.001). At follow-up, the mean urinary catheter care practices score among caregivers was 5.06 ± 3.02 in control and 14.28 ± 1.09 in the intervention group. There was a significant improvement in the mean practice score among the intervention group as compared to the control group at follow up (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The study has shown that Booklet-based Nurse-led intervention significantly improved catheter care practices among caregivers and quality of life among patients with long-term indwelling urinary catheters.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50281,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Nurse-Led-Intervention on Quality-of-Life Among Patients With Long-Term Indwelling Urinary Catheter\",\"authors\":\"Simran,&nbsp; Seema,&nbsp; Sushma,&nbsp;Vishnu Kumari,&nbsp;Meenakshi Agnihotri,&nbsp;Ravneet Kaur,&nbsp;Shanky Singh,&nbsp;Achala Agarwal,&nbsp;S. M. Ravi Mohan,&nbsp;Ashok Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijun.70001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Long-term indwelling urinary catheters can lead to various health problems among patients resulting in impaired quality of life. Nurses are vital in providing access to resources, education, and support services, such as catheter care training, family support groups, and psychological counselling. They can empower patients with long-term indwelling urinary catheters to manage their condition effectively and enhance their quality of life. The objective of the study was to develop and implement booklet-based nurse-led intervention on patients with long-term indwelling urinary catheters and to assess the effectiveness of the urinary catheter care package (UCCP) on catheter care practices among caregivers and quality of life among patients. A randomised controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary care centre in Northern India. After obtaining informed consent from each participant, a total enumeration sampling technique was used for sampling ensuring the inclusion of all eligible participants followed by computer-generated day-wise randomization. Fifty participants (patient and caregiver dyad) in each group were selected. Participants in the intervention group were given booklet-based nurse-led intervention while standard care was given to participants in the control group. Data were collected using a validated semi-structured interview schedule consisting of (a) a socio-demographic profile of patients and their caregivers, (b) a clinical profile of patients, (c) an ICIQ-LTCQOL (Quality of life questionnaire) to assess the quality of life among patients, and (d) observation checklist to assess catheter care practices among caregivers. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 22.0 employing descriptive and inferential methods. The mean age of patients was 54.88 ± 20.14 years and 53.56 ± 18.93 years in the control and intervention group, respectively. Majority of patients were male, with 86.0% in the control group vs. 80.0% in the intervention group (<i>p</i> = 0.424). Majority of patients had urine retention as a chief complaint for long-term placement of indwelling urinary catheter in both the control group and intervention group, that is, 76.0% and 60.0%, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.086). At follow up, the mean catheter function and concern score was 19.44 ± 3.45 in the control group vs. 10.17 ± 2.08 in the intervention group (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). At follow up, the mean lifestyle impact score was 11.19 ± 2.36 in the control group vs. 8.30 ± 3.79 in the intervention group (<i>p</i> = &lt; 0.001). Mean pain, discomfort and soreness score was 1.47 ± 0.65 in the control and 0.67 ± 0.59 in the intervention group at follow-up (<i>p</i> = 0.001). There was significant decrement in the mean catheter function and concern score, mean lifestyle impact score, and mean pain, discomfort and soreness score among the intervention group as compared to the control group at follow up (<i>p</i> = &lt; 0.001). At follow up, the mean overall QoL score was 33.53 ± 5.04 in control and 19.73 ± 3.98 in the intervention group. There was significant improvement in overall QoL among the intervention group as compared to the control group at follow-up (<i>p</i> = &lt; 0.001). At follow-up, the mean urinary catheter care practices score among caregivers was 5.06 ± 3.02 in control and 14.28 ± 1.09 in the intervention group. There was a significant improvement in the mean practice score among the intervention group as compared to the control group at follow up (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The study has shown that Booklet-based Nurse-led intervention significantly improved catheter care practices among caregivers and quality of life among patients with long-term indwelling urinary catheters.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Urological Nursing\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Urological Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijun.70001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijun.70001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期留置导尿管会导致患者出现各种健康问题,从而影响生活质量。护士在提供资源、教育和支持服务(如导管护理培训、家庭支持小组和心理咨询)方面至关重要。它们可以使长期留置导尿管的患者有效地管理他们的病情,提高他们的生活质量。本研究的目的是为长期留置导尿管患者开发和实施基于手册的护士主导干预,并评估导尿管护理包(UCCP)对护理人员导尿管护理实践和患者生活质量的有效性。在印度北部的一家三级保健中心进行了一项随机对照试验。在获得每位参与者的知情同意后,采用全枚举抽样技术进行抽样,确保纳入所有符合条件的参与者,然后进行计算机生成的逐日随机化。每组选择50名参与者(患者和护理者)。干预组的参与者被给予基于手册的护士主导的干预,而对照组的参与者被给予标准护理。采用经过验证的半结构化访谈计划收集数据,包括(a)患者及其护理人员的社会人口统计资料,(b)患者的临床资料,(c) ICIQ-LTCQOL(生活质量问卷)评估患者的生活质量,(d)观察清单评估护理人员的导管护理实践。统计分析采用SPSS 22.0版,采用描述性和推断性方法。对照组和干预组患者平均年龄分别为54.88±20.14岁和53.56±18.93岁。男性患者居多,对照组为86.0%,干预组为80.0% (p = 0.424)。对照组和干预组长期留置导尿管的主诉均以尿潴留为主,分别为76.0%和60.0% (p = 0.086)。随访时,对照组的导管功能和关注评分平均值为19.44±3.45分,干预组为10.17±2.08分(p < 0.001)。随访时,对照组生活方式影响评分为11.19±2.36,干预组为8.30±3.79 (p = < 0.001)。随访时,对照组疼痛、不适和酸痛平均评分为1.47±0.65,干预组为0.67±0.59,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.001)。随访时,干预组的导管功能和关注平均评分、生活方式影响平均评分、疼痛、不适和酸痛平均评分均较对照组显著降低(p = < 0.001)。随访时,对照组的平均总生活质量为33.53±5.04,干预组的平均总生活质量为19.73±3.98。随访时,干预组患者的总体生活质量较对照组有显著改善(p = < 0.001)。随访时,对照组护理人员尿管护理实践平均得分为5.06±3.02,干预组护理人员尿管护理实践平均得分为14.28±1.09。随访时,干预组的平均练习得分较对照组有显著提高(p < 0.001)。研究表明,以手册为基础的护士主导的干预显著改善了护理人员的导尿管护理实践和长期留置导尿管患者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of Nurse-Led-Intervention on Quality-of-Life Among Patients With Long-Term Indwelling Urinary Catheter

Long-term indwelling urinary catheters can lead to various health problems among patients resulting in impaired quality of life. Nurses are vital in providing access to resources, education, and support services, such as catheter care training, family support groups, and psychological counselling. They can empower patients with long-term indwelling urinary catheters to manage their condition effectively and enhance their quality of life. The objective of the study was to develop and implement booklet-based nurse-led intervention on patients with long-term indwelling urinary catheters and to assess the effectiveness of the urinary catheter care package (UCCP) on catheter care practices among caregivers and quality of life among patients. A randomised controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary care centre in Northern India. After obtaining informed consent from each participant, a total enumeration sampling technique was used for sampling ensuring the inclusion of all eligible participants followed by computer-generated day-wise randomization. Fifty participants (patient and caregiver dyad) in each group were selected. Participants in the intervention group were given booklet-based nurse-led intervention while standard care was given to participants in the control group. Data were collected using a validated semi-structured interview schedule consisting of (a) a socio-demographic profile of patients and their caregivers, (b) a clinical profile of patients, (c) an ICIQ-LTCQOL (Quality of life questionnaire) to assess the quality of life among patients, and (d) observation checklist to assess catheter care practices among caregivers. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 22.0 employing descriptive and inferential methods. The mean age of patients was 54.88 ± 20.14 years and 53.56 ± 18.93 years in the control and intervention group, respectively. Majority of patients were male, with 86.0% in the control group vs. 80.0% in the intervention group (p = 0.424). Majority of patients had urine retention as a chief complaint for long-term placement of indwelling urinary catheter in both the control group and intervention group, that is, 76.0% and 60.0%, respectively (p = 0.086). At follow up, the mean catheter function and concern score was 19.44 ± 3.45 in the control group vs. 10.17 ± 2.08 in the intervention group (p < 0.001). At follow up, the mean lifestyle impact score was 11.19 ± 2.36 in the control group vs. 8.30 ± 3.79 in the intervention group (p = < 0.001). Mean pain, discomfort and soreness score was 1.47 ± 0.65 in the control and 0.67 ± 0.59 in the intervention group at follow-up (p = 0.001). There was significant decrement in the mean catheter function and concern score, mean lifestyle impact score, and mean pain, discomfort and soreness score among the intervention group as compared to the control group at follow up (p = < 0.001). At follow up, the mean overall QoL score was 33.53 ± 5.04 in control and 19.73 ± 3.98 in the intervention group. There was significant improvement in overall QoL among the intervention group as compared to the control group at follow-up (p = < 0.001). At follow-up, the mean urinary catheter care practices score among caregivers was 5.06 ± 3.02 in control and 14.28 ± 1.09 in the intervention group. There was a significant improvement in the mean practice score among the intervention group as compared to the control group at follow up (p < 0.001). The study has shown that Booklet-based Nurse-led intervention significantly improved catheter care practices among caregivers and quality of life among patients with long-term indwelling urinary catheters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Urological Nursing is an international peer-reviewed Journal for all nurses, non-specialist and specialist, who care for individuals with urological disorders. It is relevant for nurses working in a variety of settings: inpatient care, outpatient care, ambulatory care, community care, operating departments and specialist clinics. The Journal covers the whole spectrum of urological nursing skills and knowledge. It supports the publication of local issues of relevance to a wider international community to disseminate good practice. The International Journal of Urological Nursing is clinically focused, evidence-based and welcomes contributions in the following clinical and non-clinical areas: -General Urology- Continence care- Oncology- Andrology- Stoma care- Paediatric urology- Men’s health- Uro-gynaecology- Reconstructive surgery- Clinical audit- Clinical governance- Nurse-led services- Reflective analysis- Education- Management- Research- Leadership The Journal welcomes original research papers, practice development papers and literature reviews. It also invites shorter papers such as case reports, critical commentary, reflective analysis and reports of audit, as well as contributions to regular sections such as the media reviews section. The International Journal of Urological Nursing supports the development of academic writing within the specialty and particularly welcomes papers from young researchers or practitioners who are seeking to build a publication profile.
期刊最新文献
Nursing Students' Knowledge, Attitudes and Beliefs About Testicular Cancer and Testicular Self-Examination Effectiveness of Nurse-Led-Intervention on Quality-of-Life Among Patients With Long-Term Indwelling Urinary Catheter Practices Related to Bladder Catheterisation Among Swedish Health Professionals: A Questionnaire Survey Issue Information The effects of continuous care utilizing rational emotive therapy on prostate cancer patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1