在上消化道肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术中使用右美托咪定和咪达唑仑进行非麻醉师管理镇静的可行性

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY DEN open Pub Date : 2024-12-21 DOI:10.1002/deo2.70045
Kenji Ishido, Satoshi Tanabe, Gen Kitahara, Yasuaki Furue, Takuya Wada, Akinori Watanabe, Hiromi Matsuda, Hirotsugu Okamoto, Chika Kusano
{"title":"在上消化道肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术中使用右美托咪定和咪达唑仑进行非麻醉师管理镇静的可行性","authors":"Kenji Ishido,&nbsp;Satoshi Tanabe,&nbsp;Gen Kitahara,&nbsp;Yasuaki Furue,&nbsp;Takuya Wada,&nbsp;Akinori Watanabe,&nbsp;Hiromi Matsuda,&nbsp;Hirotsugu Okamoto,&nbsp;Chika Kusano","doi":"10.1002/deo2.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The efficacy and safety of a sedation regimen combining dexmedetomidine and midazolam during endoscopic submucosal dissection for upper gastrointestinal tumors remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this sedation regimen, where non-anesthesiologists performed sedation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Sixty-eight patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for upper gastrointestinal tumors, sedated by non-anesthesiologists, were retrospectively evaluated. The sedation was performed by non-anesthesiologists as part of on-the-job training (OJT) under anesthesiologists' supervision. Each non-anesthesiologist received OJT at least thrice. Proficiency levels were assessed during the third OJT session. The target sedation depth was a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale of −2 to −4, with 2 L/min of oxygen delivered via a nasal cannula at sedation initiation. The treatment completion rates, which measured efficacy and safety, were assessed by the frequencies of respiratory depression, hypotension, and bradycardia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The study included 14, 52, and two patients with superficial esophageal cancer, early gastric cancer, and gastric adenoma, respectively. The median treatment time was 68 and 84 min for superficial esophageal cancer, early gastric cancer, and adenoma, respectively. Endoscopic submucosal dissection was completed in all patients. No severe sedation-related adverse events were reported; however, peripheral arterial oxygen saturation &lt;90%, hypotension, and bradycardia occurred in 1 (1.5%), 30 (44.1%), and 30 patients (44.1%), respectively. All 22 non-anesthesiologists who underwent the proficiency evaluation passed the test.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>A sedation regimen combining dexmedetomidine and midazolam can be feasibly administered by non-anesthesiologists. Further studies are needed to verify the effectiveness of OJT.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93973,"journal":{"name":"DEN open","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/deo2.70045","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of non-anesthesiologist-administered sedation with dexmedetomidine and midazolam during endoscopic submucosal dissection of upper gastrointestinal tumors\",\"authors\":\"Kenji Ishido,&nbsp;Satoshi Tanabe,&nbsp;Gen Kitahara,&nbsp;Yasuaki Furue,&nbsp;Takuya Wada,&nbsp;Akinori Watanabe,&nbsp;Hiromi Matsuda,&nbsp;Hirotsugu Okamoto,&nbsp;Chika Kusano\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/deo2.70045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>The efficacy and safety of a sedation regimen combining dexmedetomidine and midazolam during endoscopic submucosal dissection for upper gastrointestinal tumors remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this sedation regimen, where non-anesthesiologists performed sedation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Sixty-eight patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for upper gastrointestinal tumors, sedated by non-anesthesiologists, were retrospectively evaluated. The sedation was performed by non-anesthesiologists as part of on-the-job training (OJT) under anesthesiologists' supervision. Each non-anesthesiologist received OJT at least thrice. Proficiency levels were assessed during the third OJT session. The target sedation depth was a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale of −2 to −4, with 2 L/min of oxygen delivered via a nasal cannula at sedation initiation. The treatment completion rates, which measured efficacy and safety, were assessed by the frequencies of respiratory depression, hypotension, and bradycardia.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study included 14, 52, and two patients with superficial esophageal cancer, early gastric cancer, and gastric adenoma, respectively. The median treatment time was 68 and 84 min for superficial esophageal cancer, early gastric cancer, and adenoma, respectively. Endoscopic submucosal dissection was completed in all patients. No severe sedation-related adverse events were reported; however, peripheral arterial oxygen saturation &lt;90%, hypotension, and bradycardia occurred in 1 (1.5%), 30 (44.1%), and 30 patients (44.1%), respectively. All 22 non-anesthesiologists who underwent the proficiency evaluation passed the test.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>A sedation regimen combining dexmedetomidine and midazolam can be feasibly administered by non-anesthesiologists. Further studies are needed to verify the effectiveness of OJT.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DEN open\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/deo2.70045\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DEN open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEN open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尚不清楚右美托咪定与咪达唑仑联合应用于上消化道肿瘤内镜下粘膜下剥离术的疗效和安全性。在这项研究中,我们的目的是评估这种镇静方案的有效性和安全性,其中非麻醉师进行镇静。方法回顾性分析68例经非麻醉医师镇静的上消化道肿瘤内镜下粘膜下清扫术患者的临床资料。镇静由非麻醉医师在麻醉医师的监督下作为在职培训(OJT)的一部分进行。每位非麻醉医师至少接受三次OJT。在第三次OJT会议期间评估熟练程度。目标镇静深度为- 2至- 4的Richmond激动-镇静量表,镇静开始时通过鼻插管给氧2l /min。通过呼吸抑制、低血压和心动过缓的频率来评估治疗完成率,以衡量疗效和安全性。结果浅表性食管癌14例,早期胃癌52例,胃腺瘤2例。浅表性食管癌、早期胃癌和腺瘤的中位治疗时间分别为68 min和84 min。所有患者均完成内镜下粘膜剥离。未报告严重的镇静相关不良事件;然而,外周动脉氧饱和度90%、低血压30例(44.1%)和心动过缓分别发生1例(1.5%)、30例(44.1%)。22名非麻醉医师均通过了能力评估。结论右美托咪定与咪达唑仑联用镇静方案在非麻醉医师中是可行的。需要进一步的研究来验证OJT的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Feasibility of non-anesthesiologist-administered sedation with dexmedetomidine and midazolam during endoscopic submucosal dissection of upper gastrointestinal tumors

Objectives

The efficacy and safety of a sedation regimen combining dexmedetomidine and midazolam during endoscopic submucosal dissection for upper gastrointestinal tumors remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this sedation regimen, where non-anesthesiologists performed sedation.

Methods

Sixty-eight patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for upper gastrointestinal tumors, sedated by non-anesthesiologists, were retrospectively evaluated. The sedation was performed by non-anesthesiologists as part of on-the-job training (OJT) under anesthesiologists' supervision. Each non-anesthesiologist received OJT at least thrice. Proficiency levels were assessed during the third OJT session. The target sedation depth was a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale of −2 to −4, with 2 L/min of oxygen delivered via a nasal cannula at sedation initiation. The treatment completion rates, which measured efficacy and safety, were assessed by the frequencies of respiratory depression, hypotension, and bradycardia.

Results

The study included 14, 52, and two patients with superficial esophageal cancer, early gastric cancer, and gastric adenoma, respectively. The median treatment time was 68 and 84 min for superficial esophageal cancer, early gastric cancer, and adenoma, respectively. Endoscopic submucosal dissection was completed in all patients. No severe sedation-related adverse events were reported; however, peripheral arterial oxygen saturation <90%, hypotension, and bradycardia occurred in 1 (1.5%), 30 (44.1%), and 30 patients (44.1%), respectively. All 22 non-anesthesiologists who underwent the proficiency evaluation passed the test.

Conclusions

A sedation regimen combining dexmedetomidine and midazolam can be feasibly administered by non-anesthesiologists. Further studies are needed to verify the effectiveness of OJT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Difficult biliary cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for distal malignant biliary obstruction caused by pancreatic cancer: An observational study Endoscopic risk factors to inform early detection of gastric cancer after Helicobacter pylori eradication: Meta-analysis and systematic review Proton pump inhibitor-induced large gastric polyps can regress within 2 months after discontinuation: Experience from two cases Multiple esophageal ulcers in a pediatric case of granulomatosis with polyangiitis: A case report Endoscopic features of gastric neuroendocrine tumors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1