通过模拟和评估监测策略来优化研究投资,为试验提供信息:模拟肝纤维化监测。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Medical Research Methodology Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1186/s12874-024-02425-w
Alice J Sitch, Jacqueline Dinnes, Jenny Hewison, Walter Gregory, Julie Parkes, Jonathan J Deeks
{"title":"通过模拟和评估监测策略来优化研究投资,为试验提供信息:模拟肝纤维化监测。","authors":"Alice J Sitch, Jacqueline Dinnes, Jenny Hewison, Walter Gregory, Julie Parkes, Jonathan J Deeks","doi":"10.1186/s12874-024-02425-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of the study was to investigate the development of evidence-based monitoring strategies in a population with progressive or recurrent disease. A simulation study of monitoring strategies using a new biomarker (ELF) for the detection of liver cirrhosis in people with known liver fibrosis was undertaken alongside a randomised controlled trial (ELUCIDATE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Existing data and expert opinion were used to estimate the progression of disease and the performance of repeat testing with ELF. Knowledge of the true disease status in addition to the observed test results for a cohort of simulated patients allowed various monitoring strategies to be implemented, evaluated and validated against trial data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Several monitoring strategies ranging in complexity were successfully modelled and compared regarding the timing of detection of disease, the duration of monitoring, and the predictive value of a positive test result. The results of sensitivity analysis showed the importance of accurate data to inform the simulation. Results of the simulation were similar to those from the trial.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Monitoring data can be simulated and strategies compared given adequate knowledge of disease progression and test performance. Such exercises should be carried out to ensure optimal strategies are evaluated in trials thus reducing research waste. Monitoring data can be generated and monitoring strategies can be assessed if data is available on the monitoring test performance and the test variability. This work highlights the data necessary and the general method for evaluating the performance of monitoring strategies, allowing appropriate strategies to be selected for evaluation. Modelling work should be conducted prior to full scale investigation of monitoring strategies, allowing optimal monitoring strategies to be assessed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9114,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","volume":"24 1","pages":"315"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660973/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimising research investment by simulating and evaluating monitoring strategies to inform a trial: a simulation of liver fibrosis monitoring.\",\"authors\":\"Alice J Sitch, Jacqueline Dinnes, Jenny Hewison, Walter Gregory, Julie Parkes, Jonathan J Deeks\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12874-024-02425-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of the study was to investigate the development of evidence-based monitoring strategies in a population with progressive or recurrent disease. A simulation study of monitoring strategies using a new biomarker (ELF) for the detection of liver cirrhosis in people with known liver fibrosis was undertaken alongside a randomised controlled trial (ELUCIDATE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Existing data and expert opinion were used to estimate the progression of disease and the performance of repeat testing with ELF. Knowledge of the true disease status in addition to the observed test results for a cohort of simulated patients allowed various monitoring strategies to be implemented, evaluated and validated against trial data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Several monitoring strategies ranging in complexity were successfully modelled and compared regarding the timing of detection of disease, the duration of monitoring, and the predictive value of a positive test result. The results of sensitivity analysis showed the importance of accurate data to inform the simulation. Results of the simulation were similar to those from the trial.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Monitoring data can be simulated and strategies compared given adequate knowledge of disease progression and test performance. Such exercises should be carried out to ensure optimal strategies are evaluated in trials thus reducing research waste. Monitoring data can be generated and monitoring strategies can be assessed if data is available on the monitoring test performance and the test variability. This work highlights the data necessary and the general method for evaluating the performance of monitoring strategies, allowing appropriate strategies to be selected for evaluation. Modelling work should be conducted prior to full scale investigation of monitoring strategies, allowing optimal monitoring strategies to be assessed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Research Methodology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"315\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660973/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Research Methodology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02425-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02425-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是调查进展性或复发性疾病人群中循证监测策略的发展。在一项随机对照试验(ELUCIDATE)的同时,对已知肝纤维化患者使用一种新的生物标志物(ELF)检测肝硬化的监测策略进行了模拟研究。方法:利用现有资料和专家意见评估疾病进展和ELF重复检测的性能。除了对一组模拟患者观察到的测试结果之外,对真实疾病状态的了解允许根据试验数据实施、评估和验证各种监测策略。结果:成功地对几种复杂的监测策略进行了建模,并就疾病发现的时间、监测的持续时间和阳性检测结果的预测值进行了比较。灵敏度分析的结果表明,准确的数据对模拟的重要性。模拟的结果与试验的结果相似。结论:在充分了解疾病进展和测试性能的情况下,可以模拟监测数据并比较监测策略。应该进行这样的练习,以确保在试验中评估最佳策略,从而减少研究浪费。如果有关于监视测试性能和测试可变性的可用数据,则可以生成监视数据并评估监视策略。这项工作突出了评价监测战略执行情况所需的数据和一般方法,从而可以选择适当的战略进行评价。应在对监测策略进行全面调查之前进行建模工作,以便评估最佳监测策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimising research investment by simulating and evaluating monitoring strategies to inform a trial: a simulation of liver fibrosis monitoring.

Background: The aim of the study was to investigate the development of evidence-based monitoring strategies in a population with progressive or recurrent disease. A simulation study of monitoring strategies using a new biomarker (ELF) for the detection of liver cirrhosis in people with known liver fibrosis was undertaken alongside a randomised controlled trial (ELUCIDATE).

Methods: Existing data and expert opinion were used to estimate the progression of disease and the performance of repeat testing with ELF. Knowledge of the true disease status in addition to the observed test results for a cohort of simulated patients allowed various monitoring strategies to be implemented, evaluated and validated against trial data.

Results: Several monitoring strategies ranging in complexity were successfully modelled and compared regarding the timing of detection of disease, the duration of monitoring, and the predictive value of a positive test result. The results of sensitivity analysis showed the importance of accurate data to inform the simulation. Results of the simulation were similar to those from the trial.

Conclusion: Monitoring data can be simulated and strategies compared given adequate knowledge of disease progression and test performance. Such exercises should be carried out to ensure optimal strategies are evaluated in trials thus reducing research waste. Monitoring data can be generated and monitoring strategies can be assessed if data is available on the monitoring test performance and the test variability. This work highlights the data necessary and the general method for evaluating the performance of monitoring strategies, allowing appropriate strategies to be selected for evaluation. Modelling work should be conducted prior to full scale investigation of monitoring strategies, allowing optimal monitoring strategies to be assessed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Research Methodology
BMC Medical Research Methodology 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
298
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Research Methodology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in methodological approaches to healthcare research. Articles on the methodology of epidemiological research, clinical trials and meta-analysis/systematic review are particularly encouraged, as are empirical studies of the associations between choice of methodology and study outcomes. BMC Medical Research Methodology does not aim to publish articles describing scientific methods or techniques: these should be directed to the BMC journal covering the relevant biomedical subject area.
期刊最新文献
A generative model for evaluating missing data methods in large epidemiological cohorts. Discrepancies in safety reporting for chronic back pain clinical trials: an observational study from ClinicalTrials.gov and publications. Multiple states clustering analysis (MSCA), an unsupervised approach to multiple time-to-event electronic health records applied to multimorbidity associated with myocardial infarction. Matching plus regression adjustment for the estimation of the average treatment effect on survival outcomes: a case study with mosunetuzumab in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma. Protocol publication rate and comparison between article, registry and protocol in RCTs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1