肝损伤中药物相互作用的有效分析:利用自然语言处理和机器学习的回顾性研究。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Medical Research Methodology Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1186/s12874-024-02443-8
Junlong Ma, Heng Chen, Ji Sun, Juanjuan Huang, Gefei He, Guoping Yang
{"title":"肝损伤中药物相互作用的有效分析:利用自然语言处理和机器学习的回顾性研究。","authors":"Junlong Ma, Heng Chen, Ji Sun, Juanjuan Huang, Gefei He, Guoping Yang","doi":"10.1186/s12874-024-02443-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Liver injury from drug-drug interactions (DDIs), notably with anti-tuberculosis drugs such as isoniazid, poses a significant safety concern. Electronic medical records contain comprehensive clinical information and have gained increasing attention as a potential resource for DDI detection. However, a substantial portion of adverse drug reaction (ADR) information is hidden in unstructured narrative text, which has yet to be efficiently harnessed, thereby introducing bias into the research. There is a significant need for an efficient framework for the DDI assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a Chinese natural language processing (NLP) model, we extracted 25,130 adverse drug reaction (ADR) records, dividing them into sets for training an automated normalization model. The trained models, in conjunction with liver function laboratory tests, were used to thoroughly and efficiently identify liver injury cases. Ultimately, we applied a case-control study design to detect DDI signals increasing isoniazid's liver injury risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Logistic Regression model demonstrated stable and superior performance in classification task. Based on laboratory criteria and NLP, we identified 128 liver injury cases among a cohort of 3,209 patients treated with isoniazid. Preliminary screening of 113 drug combinations with isoniazid highlighted 20 potential signal drugs, with antibacterials constituting 25%. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of signal drugs, especially in cardiac therapy and antibacterials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our NLP and machine learning approach effectively identifies isoniazid-related DDIs that increase the risk of liver injury, identifying 20 signal drugs, mainly antibacterials. Further research is required to validate these DDI signals.</p>","PeriodicalId":9114,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","volume":"24 1","pages":"312"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660714/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficient analysis of drug interactions in liver injury: a retrospective study leveraging natural language processing and machine learning.\",\"authors\":\"Junlong Ma, Heng Chen, Ji Sun, Juanjuan Huang, Gefei He, Guoping Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12874-024-02443-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Liver injury from drug-drug interactions (DDIs), notably with anti-tuberculosis drugs such as isoniazid, poses a significant safety concern. Electronic medical records contain comprehensive clinical information and have gained increasing attention as a potential resource for DDI detection. However, a substantial portion of adverse drug reaction (ADR) information is hidden in unstructured narrative text, which has yet to be efficiently harnessed, thereby introducing bias into the research. There is a significant need for an efficient framework for the DDI assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a Chinese natural language processing (NLP) model, we extracted 25,130 adverse drug reaction (ADR) records, dividing them into sets for training an automated normalization model. The trained models, in conjunction with liver function laboratory tests, were used to thoroughly and efficiently identify liver injury cases. Ultimately, we applied a case-control study design to detect DDI signals increasing isoniazid's liver injury risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Logistic Regression model demonstrated stable and superior performance in classification task. Based on laboratory criteria and NLP, we identified 128 liver injury cases among a cohort of 3,209 patients treated with isoniazid. Preliminary screening of 113 drug combinations with isoniazid highlighted 20 potential signal drugs, with antibacterials constituting 25%. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of signal drugs, especially in cardiac therapy and antibacterials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our NLP and machine learning approach effectively identifies isoniazid-related DDIs that increase the risk of liver injury, identifying 20 signal drugs, mainly antibacterials. Further research is required to validate these DDI signals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Research Methodology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"312\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660714/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Research Methodology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02443-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02443-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:药物-药物相互作用(ddi)引起的肝损伤,特别是与异烟肼等抗结核药物的相互作用,引起了严重的安全性问题。电子病历包含全面的临床信息,作为检测DDI的潜在资源,越来越受到人们的关注。然而,很大一部分药物不良反应(ADR)信息隐藏在非结构化的叙事文本中,这些信息尚未得到有效利用,从而给研究带来了偏见。非常需要一个有效的DDI评估框架。方法:采用中文自然语言处理(NLP)模型,提取25130例药品不良反应(ADR)记录,将其划分为多个集,训练自动归一化模型。经过训练的模型与肝功能实验室测试相结合,用于彻底有效地识别肝损伤病例。最后,我们采用病例对照研究设计来检测增加异烟肼肝损伤风险的DDI信号。结果:Logistic回归模型在分类任务中表现出稳定和优越的性能。基于实验室标准和NLP,我们在3209例异烟肼治疗的患者中确定了128例肝损伤病例。初步筛选了113种异烟肼联合用药,突出了20种潜在的信号药物,其中抗菌药占25%。敏感性分析证实了信号药物的稳健性,特别是在心脏治疗和抗菌药物方面。结论:我们的NLP和机器学习方法可以有效识别出与异烟肼相关的ddi增加肝损伤风险,识别出20种信号药物,主要是抗菌药物。需要进一步的研究来验证这些DDI信号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficient analysis of drug interactions in liver injury: a retrospective study leveraging natural language processing and machine learning.

Background: Liver injury from drug-drug interactions (DDIs), notably with anti-tuberculosis drugs such as isoniazid, poses a significant safety concern. Electronic medical records contain comprehensive clinical information and have gained increasing attention as a potential resource for DDI detection. However, a substantial portion of adverse drug reaction (ADR) information is hidden in unstructured narrative text, which has yet to be efficiently harnessed, thereby introducing bias into the research. There is a significant need for an efficient framework for the DDI assessment.

Methods: Using a Chinese natural language processing (NLP) model, we extracted 25,130 adverse drug reaction (ADR) records, dividing them into sets for training an automated normalization model. The trained models, in conjunction with liver function laboratory tests, were used to thoroughly and efficiently identify liver injury cases. Ultimately, we applied a case-control study design to detect DDI signals increasing isoniazid's liver injury risk.

Results: The Logistic Regression model demonstrated stable and superior performance in classification task. Based on laboratory criteria and NLP, we identified 128 liver injury cases among a cohort of 3,209 patients treated with isoniazid. Preliminary screening of 113 drug combinations with isoniazid highlighted 20 potential signal drugs, with antibacterials constituting 25%. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of signal drugs, especially in cardiac therapy and antibacterials.

Conclusion: Our NLP and machine learning approach effectively identifies isoniazid-related DDIs that increase the risk of liver injury, identifying 20 signal drugs, mainly antibacterials. Further research is required to validate these DDI signals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Research Methodology
BMC Medical Research Methodology 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
298
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Research Methodology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in methodological approaches to healthcare research. Articles on the methodology of epidemiological research, clinical trials and meta-analysis/systematic review are particularly encouraged, as are empirical studies of the associations between choice of methodology and study outcomes. BMC Medical Research Methodology does not aim to publish articles describing scientific methods or techniques: these should be directed to the BMC journal covering the relevant biomedical subject area.
期刊最新文献
A generative model for evaluating missing data methods in large epidemiological cohorts. Discrepancies in safety reporting for chronic back pain clinical trials: an observational study from ClinicalTrials.gov and publications. Multiple states clustering analysis (MSCA), an unsupervised approach to multiple time-to-event electronic health records applied to multimorbidity associated with myocardial infarction. Matching plus regression adjustment for the estimation of the average treatment effect on survival outcomes: a case study with mosunetuzumab in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma. Protocol publication rate and comparison between article, registry and protocol in RCTs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1