自由氧疗与保守氧疗对机械通气脓毒症患者血流动力学参数的影响:一项随机临床试验

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY BMC Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1186/s12871-024-02838-6
Huda F Ghazaly, Ahmed Alsaied A Aly, Ahmed S Tammam, Mahmoud M Hassan, Soudy S Hammad, Naggeh M Mahmoud, Tarek S Hemaida
{"title":"自由氧疗与保守氧疗对机械通气脓毒症患者血流动力学参数的影响:一项随机临床试验","authors":"Huda F Ghazaly, Ahmed Alsaied A Aly, Ahmed S Tammam, Mahmoud M Hassan, Soudy S Hammad, Naggeh M Mahmoud, Tarek S Hemaida","doi":"10.1186/s12871-024-02838-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is no significant evidence verifying the efficacy of liberal versus conservative oxygen therapy on hemodynamics in patients with sepsis. We investigated how liberal and conservative oxygen therapy influenced stroke volume, cardiac output, and vasopressor needs in patients with sepsis undergoing mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized clinical trial included 106 patients with an admission diagnosis of infection, a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of two points or higher and required invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 72 h. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two oxygenation strategies: liberal (n = 53) with a target SpO2 of ≥ 96% or conservative (n = 53) with a target SpO2 of 88-92%. Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography was done twice to measure stroke volume and cardiac output, initially upon enrollment in the trial and then 72 h later. The primary outcome was stroke volume. Secondary outcomes were cardiac output, vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation duration, ICU stay length, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stroke volume and cardiac output measurements did not differ significantly between research groups after 72 h of oxygenation treatment (p = 0.459 and 0.637, respectively). Forty-five patients (84.9%) in the conservative oxygen therapy group needed vasopressors to maintain their mean arterial pressure above 65 mmHg, whereas 35 patients (66.0%) in the liberal group did (p = 0.024). A multivariate logistic regression analysis of the independent variables for vasopressor requirements revealed that patients in the conservative oxygen group were 3.83 times more likely to require vasopressors (AOR = 3.83, 95% CI: 1.31-11.18, p = 0.014) than those in the liberal group. Older patients (AOR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.07, p = 0.038) and those with higher SOFA scores (AOR = 1.36, CI: 1.09-1.68, P = 0.005) were significantly more likely to need vasopressors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Liberal or conservative oxygen therapy did not influence stroke volume or cardiac output measurements in mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis. Patients in the conservative oxygen group were more likely to require vasopressors than those in the liberal group.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Aswan University Hospital (approval number: Aswu/460/5/20) (registration date: 05/05/2020) and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04824703) (03/30/2021).</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"24 1","pages":"469"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of liberal versus conservative oxygen therapies on the hemodynamic parameters of mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis: a randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Huda F Ghazaly, Ahmed Alsaied A Aly, Ahmed S Tammam, Mahmoud M Hassan, Soudy S Hammad, Naggeh M Mahmoud, Tarek S Hemaida\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12871-024-02838-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is no significant evidence verifying the efficacy of liberal versus conservative oxygen therapy on hemodynamics in patients with sepsis. We investigated how liberal and conservative oxygen therapy influenced stroke volume, cardiac output, and vasopressor needs in patients with sepsis undergoing mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized clinical trial included 106 patients with an admission diagnosis of infection, a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of two points or higher and required invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 72 h. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two oxygenation strategies: liberal (n = 53) with a target SpO2 of ≥ 96% or conservative (n = 53) with a target SpO2 of 88-92%. Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography was done twice to measure stroke volume and cardiac output, initially upon enrollment in the trial and then 72 h later. The primary outcome was stroke volume. Secondary outcomes were cardiac output, vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation duration, ICU stay length, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stroke volume and cardiac output measurements did not differ significantly between research groups after 72 h of oxygenation treatment (p = 0.459 and 0.637, respectively). Forty-five patients (84.9%) in the conservative oxygen therapy group needed vasopressors to maintain their mean arterial pressure above 65 mmHg, whereas 35 patients (66.0%) in the liberal group did (p = 0.024). A multivariate logistic regression analysis of the independent variables for vasopressor requirements revealed that patients in the conservative oxygen group were 3.83 times more likely to require vasopressors (AOR = 3.83, 95% CI: 1.31-11.18, p = 0.014) than those in the liberal group. Older patients (AOR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.07, p = 0.038) and those with higher SOFA scores (AOR = 1.36, CI: 1.09-1.68, P = 0.005) were significantly more likely to need vasopressors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Liberal or conservative oxygen therapy did not influence stroke volume or cardiac output measurements in mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis. Patients in the conservative oxygen group were more likely to require vasopressors than those in the liberal group.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Aswan University Hospital (approval number: Aswu/460/5/20) (registration date: 05/05/2020) and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04824703) (03/30/2021).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"469\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660434/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02838-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02838-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前还没有明显的证据证实自由氧治疗与保守氧治疗对脓毒症患者血流动力学的影响。我们研究了自由氧治疗和保守氧治疗如何影响机械通气脓毒症患者的脑卒中量、心输出量和血管加压素需求。方法:该随机临床试验纳入106例入院诊断为感染,顺序器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分为2分或更高,需要有创机械通气至少72小时的患者。患者被随机分配到两种氧合策略中的一种:自由氧合(n = 53),目标SpO2≥96%,或保守氧合(n = 53),目标SpO2为88-92%。经胸多普勒超声心动图两次测量脑卒中量和心输出量,一次是在入组试验时,一次是在72小时后。主要终点为脑卒中量。次要结局为心排血量、血管加压剂使用、机械通气时间、ICU住院时间和不良事件。结果:在氧合治疗72小时后,各研究组之间的脑卒中容量和心输出量测量无显著差异(p分别= 0.459和0.637)。保守氧疗组45例(84.9%)患者需要血管加压药物维持平均动脉压在65 mmHg以上,而自由氧疗组35例(66.0%)患者需要血管加压药物维持平均动脉压在65 mmHg以上(p = 0.024)。对血管加压素需要量的自变量进行多因素logistic回归分析显示,保守氧组患者血管加压素需要量是自由氧组患者的3.83倍(AOR = 3.83, 95% CI: 1.31-11.18, p = 0.014)。老年患者(AOR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.07, p = 0.038)和SOFA评分较高的患者(AOR = 1.36, CI: 1.09-1.68, p = 0.005)更可能需要血管加压药物。结论:自由或保守氧疗对机械通气脓毒症患者的脑卒中容量或心输出量测量没有影响。保守供氧组患者比自由供氧组患者更有可能需要血管加压药。试验注册:本研究已获得阿斯旺大学医院伦理委员会批准(批准号:Aswu/460/5/20)(注册日期:05/05/2020),并在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册(NCT04824703)(03/30/2021)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence of liberal versus conservative oxygen therapies on the hemodynamic parameters of mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis: a randomized clinical trial.

Background: There is no significant evidence verifying the efficacy of liberal versus conservative oxygen therapy on hemodynamics in patients with sepsis. We investigated how liberal and conservative oxygen therapy influenced stroke volume, cardiac output, and vasopressor needs in patients with sepsis undergoing mechanical ventilation.

Methods: This randomized clinical trial included 106 patients with an admission diagnosis of infection, a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of two points or higher and required invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 72 h. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two oxygenation strategies: liberal (n = 53) with a target SpO2 of ≥ 96% or conservative (n = 53) with a target SpO2 of 88-92%. Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography was done twice to measure stroke volume and cardiac output, initially upon enrollment in the trial and then 72 h later. The primary outcome was stroke volume. Secondary outcomes were cardiac output, vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation duration, ICU stay length, and adverse events.

Results: Stroke volume and cardiac output measurements did not differ significantly between research groups after 72 h of oxygenation treatment (p = 0.459 and 0.637, respectively). Forty-five patients (84.9%) in the conservative oxygen therapy group needed vasopressors to maintain their mean arterial pressure above 65 mmHg, whereas 35 patients (66.0%) in the liberal group did (p = 0.024). A multivariate logistic regression analysis of the independent variables for vasopressor requirements revealed that patients in the conservative oxygen group were 3.83 times more likely to require vasopressors (AOR = 3.83, 95% CI: 1.31-11.18, p = 0.014) than those in the liberal group. Older patients (AOR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.07, p = 0.038) and those with higher SOFA scores (AOR = 1.36, CI: 1.09-1.68, P = 0.005) were significantly more likely to need vasopressors.

Conclusions: Liberal or conservative oxygen therapy did not influence stroke volume or cardiac output measurements in mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis. Patients in the conservative oxygen group were more likely to require vasopressors than those in the liberal group.

Trial registration: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Aswan University Hospital (approval number: Aswu/460/5/20) (registration date: 05/05/2020) and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04824703) (03/30/2021).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
期刊最新文献
Effects of balanced opioid-free anesthesia on post-operative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery: a randomized trial. Efficacy of continuous intravenous infusion of lidocaine on postoperative sore throat after laryngeal mask insertion: a randomized controlled trial. Predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting after cesarean section: a nomogram model combined with gastric ultrasound. Impact of a positive end-expiratory pressure on oxygenation, respiratory compliance, and hemodynamics in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery in reverse Trendelenburg position: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Application of a novel extracorporeal membrane oxygenation system in awake Hu sheep under various durations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1