肠内免疫营养对结直肠癌腹腔镜切除术和开放切除术的影响:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Ejso Pub Date : 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2024.109488
Chee Siong Wong, Shafquat Zaman, Koushik Siddiraju, Archana Sellvaraj, Tariq Ghattas, Yegor Tryliskyy
{"title":"肠内免疫营养对结直肠癌腹腔镜切除术和开放切除术的影响:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。","authors":"Chee Siong Wong, Shafquat Zaman, Koushik Siddiraju, Archana Sellvaraj, Tariq Ghattas, Yegor Tryliskyy","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2024.109488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Immunonutrition (IMN) modulates the activity of the immune system. However, the effects of IMN on cancer patients following colorectal surgery is still lacking. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the outcomes of IMN in patients undergoing laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of multiple electronic data sources was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and included MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science. All eligible studies reporting comparative outcomes of immunonutrition in colorectal surgery were included. Subgroup analysis of outcomes of interest was performed and data were analysed using Review Manager (RevMan) Version 5.4.1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. The final pooled analysis included 1199 patients (592 IMN group and 592 control group). Of these, 55.3 % (655/1184) had open colorectal surgery (OG) and 44.7 % (529/1184) underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LG). IMN reduced the risk of wound infection significantly in the OG [risk ratio (RR) 0.48, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.32 to 0.72; p = 0.0005)] and the open and laparoscopic group (OLG) [RR 0.33, 95 % CI 0.15 to 0.76; p = 0.008]. Moreover, IMN was also associated with a significantly shorter length of hospital stay (MD - 2.37 days, 95 % CI - 3.39 to -1.36; p < 0.0001) in the OG. Other post-operative morbidities (anastomotic leak and ileus) and mortality outcomes in the OG, LG, and OLG were comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pre-operative IMN could reduce the wound infection rate and shorten length of hospital stay in patients following elective colorectal surgery. The benefit of these improved clinical outcomes could be further evaluated with a cost-benefit analysis. IMN should be recommended as nutritional adjunct in the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) pathway following colorectal surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"51 2","pages":"109488"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of enteral immunonutrition in laparoscopic versus open resections in colorectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Chee Siong Wong, Shafquat Zaman, Koushik Siddiraju, Archana Sellvaraj, Tariq Ghattas, Yegor Tryliskyy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejso.2024.109488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Immunonutrition (IMN) modulates the activity of the immune system. However, the effects of IMN on cancer patients following colorectal surgery is still lacking. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the outcomes of IMN in patients undergoing laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of multiple electronic data sources was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and included MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science. All eligible studies reporting comparative outcomes of immunonutrition in colorectal surgery were included. Subgroup analysis of outcomes of interest was performed and data were analysed using Review Manager (RevMan) Version 5.4.1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. The final pooled analysis included 1199 patients (592 IMN group and 592 control group). Of these, 55.3 % (655/1184) had open colorectal surgery (OG) and 44.7 % (529/1184) underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LG). IMN reduced the risk of wound infection significantly in the OG [risk ratio (RR) 0.48, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.32 to 0.72; p = 0.0005)] and the open and laparoscopic group (OLG) [RR 0.33, 95 % CI 0.15 to 0.76; p = 0.008]. Moreover, IMN was also associated with a significantly shorter length of hospital stay (MD - 2.37 days, 95 % CI - 3.39 to -1.36; p < 0.0001) in the OG. Other post-operative morbidities (anastomotic leak and ileus) and mortality outcomes in the OG, LG, and OLG were comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pre-operative IMN could reduce the wound infection rate and shorten length of hospital stay in patients following elective colorectal surgery. The benefit of these improved clinical outcomes could be further evaluated with a cost-benefit analysis. IMN should be recommended as nutritional adjunct in the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) pathway following colorectal surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ejso\",\"volume\":\"51 2\",\"pages\":\"109488\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ejso\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2024.109488\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2024.109488","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

免疫营养(IMN)调节免疫系统的活性。然而,IMN对结直肠癌术后癌症患者的影响仍缺乏研究。我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估腹腔镜与开放式结直肠手术患者IMN的结果。方法:根据PRISMA指南系统检索多个电子数据源,包括PubMed、EMBASE、Scopus和Web of Science的MEDLINE。所有报告结肠直肠手术免疫营养比较结果的符合条件的研究被纳入。使用Review Manager (RevMan) Version 5.4.1对感兴趣的结果进行亚组分析和数据分析。结果:纳入9项随机对照试验(RCTs)。最终汇总分析纳入1199例患者(IMN组592例,对照组592例)。其中55.3%(655/1184)行开腹结直肠手术(OG), 44.7%(529/1184)行腹腔镜结直肠手术(LG)。IMN显著降低了OG组的伤口感染风险[风险比(RR) 0.48, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.32 ~ 0.72;p = 0.0005)]和开放和腹腔镜组(OLG) [RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.15 ~ 0.76;p = 0.008]。此外,IMN还与住院时间显著缩短相关(MD - 2.37天,95% CI - 3.39至-1.36;结论:择期结直肠手术患者术前IMN可降低伤口感染率,缩短住院时间。这些改善的临床结果的益处可以通过成本效益分析进一步评估。应推荐IMN作为结直肠手术后增强术后恢复(ERAS)途径的营养辅助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of enteral immunonutrition in laparoscopic versus open resections in colorectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Introduction: Immunonutrition (IMN) modulates the activity of the immune system. However, the effects of IMN on cancer patients following colorectal surgery is still lacking. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the outcomes of IMN in patients undergoing laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery.

Methods: A systematic search of multiple electronic data sources was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and included MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science. All eligible studies reporting comparative outcomes of immunonutrition in colorectal surgery were included. Subgroup analysis of outcomes of interest was performed and data were analysed using Review Manager (RevMan) Version 5.4.1.

Results: Nine randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. The final pooled analysis included 1199 patients (592 IMN group and 592 control group). Of these, 55.3 % (655/1184) had open colorectal surgery (OG) and 44.7 % (529/1184) underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LG). IMN reduced the risk of wound infection significantly in the OG [risk ratio (RR) 0.48, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.32 to 0.72; p = 0.0005)] and the open and laparoscopic group (OLG) [RR 0.33, 95 % CI 0.15 to 0.76; p = 0.008]. Moreover, IMN was also associated with a significantly shorter length of hospital stay (MD - 2.37 days, 95 % CI - 3.39 to -1.36; p < 0.0001) in the OG. Other post-operative morbidities (anastomotic leak and ileus) and mortality outcomes in the OG, LG, and OLG were comparable.

Conclusions: Pre-operative IMN could reduce the wound infection rate and shorten length of hospital stay in patients following elective colorectal surgery. The benefit of these improved clinical outcomes could be further evaluated with a cost-benefit analysis. IMN should be recommended as nutritional adjunct in the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) pathway following colorectal surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ejso
Ejso 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1148
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery. The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Clinical implications of disappearing pancreatic cancer liver metastases: Lessons from colorectal liver metastases. Severe postoperative pancreatitis following treatment of peritoneal metastases. Risk factors and prognostic factors of pleural metastases in thymic epithelial tumors: A narrative review. Long-term outcomes of hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A comparative study with conventional hepatectomy. Overcoming the technical challenge of venous resection with pancreatectomy: Which factors determine survival?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1