骨形态发生蛋白2 (rhBMP-2)在脊柱融合术中的成本-效果分析:系统综述。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1177/21925682241310864
Ravi S Nunna, Maxwell D Gruber, Sasidhar Karuparti, Zachary Taylor, Sabrina Genovese, Fareed Jumah, Periklis Godolias, Zachary Tataryn, Douglas Hollern, Rod Oskouian, Jens R Chapman
{"title":"骨形态发生蛋白2 (rhBMP-2)在脊柱融合术中的成本-效果分析:系统综述。","authors":"Ravi S Nunna, Maxwell D Gruber, Sasidhar Karuparti, Zachary Taylor, Sabrina Genovese, Fareed Jumah, Periklis Godolias, Zachary Tataryn, Douglas Hollern, Rod Oskouian, Jens R Chapman","doi":"10.1177/21925682241310864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic Review Study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of rhBMP-2 in spine surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, MEDLINE, OVID and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) databases were systematically searched for studies reporting the use of rhBMP-2 for spinal procedures in comparison to autograft and/or allograft and alternative graft materials under consideration of cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit, cost minimization, and/or cost-utility analysis. Relevant data points were extracted and compiled. The standardization of the selected studies was graded using the CHEERS criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 88 eligible publications, 17 met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 8 studies showed a favorable cost-analysis profile. Three studies performed cost-consequence analyses, none of which reported positive findings. Among 7 cost-utility analyses and 7 cost-effectiveness analyses, 3 and 5, respectively, reported a likely benefit to the usage of rhBMP-2. The CHEERS scores for the included studies ranged from 15 to 23 out of 24 points, with a median score of 19.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is no consensus regarding the cost-effectiveness or cost-utility of rhBMP-2 in spinal fusion. rhBMP-2 may function as a cost-effective adjunct in spinal fusion surgeries in select cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682241310864"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662347/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 (rhBMP-2) in Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Ravi S Nunna, Maxwell D Gruber, Sasidhar Karuparti, Zachary Taylor, Sabrina Genovese, Fareed Jumah, Periklis Godolias, Zachary Tataryn, Douglas Hollern, Rod Oskouian, Jens R Chapman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21925682241310864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic Review Study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of rhBMP-2 in spine surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, MEDLINE, OVID and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) databases were systematically searched for studies reporting the use of rhBMP-2 for spinal procedures in comparison to autograft and/or allograft and alternative graft materials under consideration of cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit, cost minimization, and/or cost-utility analysis. Relevant data points were extracted and compiled. The standardization of the selected studies was graded using the CHEERS criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 88 eligible publications, 17 met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 8 studies showed a favorable cost-analysis profile. Three studies performed cost-consequence analyses, none of which reported positive findings. Among 7 cost-utility analyses and 7 cost-effectiveness analyses, 3 and 5, respectively, reported a likely benefit to the usage of rhBMP-2. The CHEERS scores for the included studies ranged from 15 to 23 out of 24 points, with a median score of 19.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is no consensus regarding the cost-effectiveness or cost-utility of rhBMP-2 in spinal fusion. rhBMP-2 may function as a cost-effective adjunct in spinal fusion surgeries in select cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"21925682241310864\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662347/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241310864\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241310864","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:系统评价研究。目的:本研究的目的是评估rhBMP-2在脊柱手术中的成本-效果和成本-效用。方法:系统检索PubMed、MEDLINE、OVID和CENTRAL (Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials)数据库,根据成本-效果、成本-收益、成本最小化和/或成本-效用分析,与自体移植物和/或同种异体移植物和替代移植物材料相比,报道在脊柱手术中使用rhBMP-2的研究。提取并整理相关数据点。所选研究的标准化使用CHEERS标准进行分级。结果:88篇入选文献中,17篇符合纳入标准。总的来说,8项研究显示了有利的成本分析概况。三项研究进行了成本-后果分析,没有一项研究报告了积极的结果。在7个成本效用分析和7个成本效益分析中,分别有3个和5个报告了使用rhBMP-2可能带来的好处。所纳入研究的CHEERS得分为15 - 23分(总分24分),中位数为19分。结论:关于rhBMP-2在脊柱融合术中的成本-效果或成本-效用尚无共识。在某些病例中,rhBMP-2可能作为一种经济有效的辅助手段在脊柱融合手术中发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 (rhBMP-2) in Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review.

Study design: Systematic Review Study.

Objectives: The objective of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of rhBMP-2 in spine surgeries.

Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, OVID and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) databases were systematically searched for studies reporting the use of rhBMP-2 for spinal procedures in comparison to autograft and/or allograft and alternative graft materials under consideration of cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit, cost minimization, and/or cost-utility analysis. Relevant data points were extracted and compiled. The standardization of the selected studies was graded using the CHEERS criteria.

Results: Of the 88 eligible publications, 17 met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 8 studies showed a favorable cost-analysis profile. Three studies performed cost-consequence analyses, none of which reported positive findings. Among 7 cost-utility analyses and 7 cost-effectiveness analyses, 3 and 5, respectively, reported a likely benefit to the usage of rhBMP-2. The CHEERS scores for the included studies ranged from 15 to 23 out of 24 points, with a median score of 19.

Conclusions: There is no consensus regarding the cost-effectiveness or cost-utility of rhBMP-2 in spinal fusion. rhBMP-2 may function as a cost-effective adjunct in spinal fusion surgeries in select cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
期刊最新文献
Letter Re: "Is Endoscopic Surgery a Safe and Effective Treatment for Lumbar Disc Herniation? A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials". Full-Percutaneous Trans-Kambin Lumbar Interbody Fusion With a Large-Footprint Interbody Cage. Letter to the Editor: "Which is the Superior Thoracolumbar Injury Classification Tool? TLICS Versus AOSpine 2013: A Systematic Review". Response to Letter to the Editor for "Are Variable Screw Angle Change and Screw-to-Vertebral Body Ratio Associated With Radiographic Subsidence Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?" Interventions to Modify Psychological Processes in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1