Peter Brieger, Luisa Klocke, Andreas Bechdolf, Sebastian von Peter, Gerhard Längle, Martin Holzke, Konstantinos Nikolaidis, Reinhold Kilian, Jürgen Timm, Stefan Weinmann, Tamara Waldmann, Johanna Zur Verth, Svenja Raschmann, Julian Schwarz, Sandeep Rout, Constance Hirschmeier, Uwe Herwig, Janina Richter, Johanna Baumgardt, Johannes Hamann
{"title":"[直接入院接受相当于住院病人的家庭治疗与从精神科病房转院的比较]。","authors":"Peter Brieger, Luisa Klocke, Andreas Bechdolf, Sebastian von Peter, Gerhard Längle, Martin Holzke, Konstantinos Nikolaidis, Reinhold Kilian, Jürgen Timm, Stefan Weinmann, Tamara Waldmann, Johanna Zur Verth, Svenja Raschmann, Julian Schwarz, Sandeep Rout, Constance Hirschmeier, Uwe Herwig, Janina Richter, Johanna Baumgardt, Johannes Hamann","doi":"10.1055/a-2477-3639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Different access routes to inpatient-equivalent home treatment (IEHT) were examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline differences were examined using exploratory group comparisons, treatment effects by type of admission using regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 200 StäB users, 144 (72%) were admitted directly to IEHT, while 56 (28%) were transferred. Direct admissions showed a higher prevalence of affective disorders, while transfers more often had schizophrenia. There were no relevant differences in terms of treatment effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Access to IEHT treatment is used flexibly, treatment outcomes do not differ significantly. Outreach services should be designed even more flexible.</p>","PeriodicalId":20711,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrische Praxis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[A comparison of direct admissions to inpatient-equivalent home treatment with transfers from psychiatric wards].\",\"authors\":\"Peter Brieger, Luisa Klocke, Andreas Bechdolf, Sebastian von Peter, Gerhard Längle, Martin Holzke, Konstantinos Nikolaidis, Reinhold Kilian, Jürgen Timm, Stefan Weinmann, Tamara Waldmann, Johanna Zur Verth, Svenja Raschmann, Julian Schwarz, Sandeep Rout, Constance Hirschmeier, Uwe Herwig, Janina Richter, Johanna Baumgardt, Johannes Hamann\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2477-3639\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Different access routes to inpatient-equivalent home treatment (IEHT) were examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline differences were examined using exploratory group comparisons, treatment effects by type of admission using regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 200 StäB users, 144 (72%) were admitted directly to IEHT, while 56 (28%) were transferred. Direct admissions showed a higher prevalence of affective disorders, while transfers more often had schizophrenia. There were no relevant differences in terms of treatment effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Access to IEHT treatment is used flexibly, treatment outcomes do not differ significantly. Outreach services should be designed even more flexible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatrische Praxis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatrische Praxis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2477-3639\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatrische Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2477-3639","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
[A comparison of direct admissions to inpatient-equivalent home treatment with transfers from psychiatric wards].
Aim: Different access routes to inpatient-equivalent home treatment (IEHT) were examined.
Methods: Baseline differences were examined using exploratory group comparisons, treatment effects by type of admission using regression analysis.
Results: Of 200 StäB users, 144 (72%) were admitted directly to IEHT, while 56 (28%) were transferred. Direct admissions showed a higher prevalence of affective disorders, while transfers more often had schizophrenia. There were no relevant differences in terms of treatment effects.
Conclusion: Access to IEHT treatment is used flexibly, treatment outcomes do not differ significantly. Outreach services should be designed even more flexible.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
