老年髋部骨折患者围手术期美沙酮与安慰剂的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案(MetaHip试验)

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Trials Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08694-6
Kevin Heebøll Nygaard, Thomas Strøm, Kirsten Specht, Sofie Ronja Petersen, Jesper Ougaard Schønnemann
{"title":"老年髋部骨折患者围手术期美沙酮与安慰剂的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案(MetaHip试验)","authors":"Kevin Heebøll Nygaard, Thomas Strøm, Kirsten Specht, Sofie Ronja Petersen, Jesper Ougaard Schønnemann","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08694-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hip fractures are a source of severe pain among the elderly population and pose challenges due to limited analgesic tolerance. Perioperative methadone has shown promise in our pilot study suggesting a safe dose of 0.10 mg/kg, prompting further investigation into its benefits for elderly hip fracture patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employs a double-blinded randomized controlled trial to assess the analgesic effects of a single dose of methadone during hip fracture surgery. Patients aged ≥ 60 years are consecutively enrolled and randomized to receive either perioperative methadone (treatment group) or a saline solution (placebo group). A sample size of 130 patients is required for 88% statistical power. The medication is administered intravenously at anesthesia induction and monitored until discharge. A follow-up observation is conducted 3 months post-surgery.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Primary outcome: Daily consumption of opioids within the first 3 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes include pain, mobility, nausea, vomiting, time to discharge, need for antidote, delirium, and constipation. The 3-month follow-up includes opioid use, pain, EQ-5D-5L scores, mobility, and persistent side effects. If statistically significant advantages are found in the treatment group, perioperative methadone could be considered as standard care for hip fracture patients, potentially enhancing their pain management. The study's outcomes will provide insights into the feasibility and effectiveness of incorporating methadone into routine clinical practices for this patient group.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06086171, submitted 4. October 2023.</p><p><strong>Eu-ct: </strong>2023-506252-24-00, UTN: U1111-1294-6125.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"25 1","pages":"842"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660571/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perioperative methadone compared to placebo in elderly hip fracture patients: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (MetaHip trial).\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Heebøll Nygaard, Thomas Strøm, Kirsten Specht, Sofie Ronja Petersen, Jesper Ougaard Schønnemann\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13063-024-08694-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hip fractures are a source of severe pain among the elderly population and pose challenges due to limited analgesic tolerance. Perioperative methadone has shown promise in our pilot study suggesting a safe dose of 0.10 mg/kg, prompting further investigation into its benefits for elderly hip fracture patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employs a double-blinded randomized controlled trial to assess the analgesic effects of a single dose of methadone during hip fracture surgery. Patients aged ≥ 60 years are consecutively enrolled and randomized to receive either perioperative methadone (treatment group) or a saline solution (placebo group). A sample size of 130 patients is required for 88% statistical power. The medication is administered intravenously at anesthesia induction and monitored until discharge. A follow-up observation is conducted 3 months post-surgery.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Primary outcome: Daily consumption of opioids within the first 3 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes include pain, mobility, nausea, vomiting, time to discharge, need for antidote, delirium, and constipation. The 3-month follow-up includes opioid use, pain, EQ-5D-5L scores, mobility, and persistent side effects. If statistically significant advantages are found in the treatment group, perioperative methadone could be considered as standard care for hip fracture patients, potentially enhancing their pain management. The study's outcomes will provide insights into the feasibility and effectiveness of incorporating methadone into routine clinical practices for this patient group.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06086171, submitted 4. October 2023.</p><p><strong>Eu-ct: </strong>2023-506252-24-00, UTN: U1111-1294-6125.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trials\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"842\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660571/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08694-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08694-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:髋部骨折是老年人严重疼痛的一个来源,并且由于有限的镇痛耐受性带来了挑战。在我们的初步研究中,围手术期美沙酮显示出0.10 mg/kg的安全剂量,提示进一步研究其对老年髋部骨折患者的益处。方法:本研究采用双盲随机对照试验,评估单剂量美沙酮在髋部骨折手术中的镇痛效果。年龄≥60岁的患者连续入组,随机接受围手术期美沙酮(治疗组)或生理盐水(安慰剂组)。需要130例患者的样本量才能达到88%的统计效力。在麻醉诱导时静脉给药并监测直到出院。术后3个月随访观察。讨论:主要结局:术后前3天内阿片类药物的每日消耗。次要结局包括疼痛、活动能力、恶心、呕吐、出院时间、解药需求、谵妄和便秘。3个月的随访包括阿片类药物使用、疼痛、EQ-5D-5L评分、活动能力和持续副作用。如果治疗组有统计学上显著的优势,那么围手术期美沙酮可以作为髋部骨折患者的标准治疗,可能会加强他们的疼痛管理。该研究的结果将为将美沙酮纳入该患者组常规临床实践的可行性和有效性提供见解。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06086171,提交4份。2023年10月。Eu-ct: 2023-506252-24-00, UTN: U1111-1294-6125。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perioperative methadone compared to placebo in elderly hip fracture patients: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (MetaHip trial).

Background: Hip fractures are a source of severe pain among the elderly population and pose challenges due to limited analgesic tolerance. Perioperative methadone has shown promise in our pilot study suggesting a safe dose of 0.10 mg/kg, prompting further investigation into its benefits for elderly hip fracture patients.

Methods: This study employs a double-blinded randomized controlled trial to assess the analgesic effects of a single dose of methadone during hip fracture surgery. Patients aged ≥ 60 years are consecutively enrolled and randomized to receive either perioperative methadone (treatment group) or a saline solution (placebo group). A sample size of 130 patients is required for 88% statistical power. The medication is administered intravenously at anesthesia induction and monitored until discharge. A follow-up observation is conducted 3 months post-surgery.

Discussion: Primary outcome: Daily consumption of opioids within the first 3 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes include pain, mobility, nausea, vomiting, time to discharge, need for antidote, delirium, and constipation. The 3-month follow-up includes opioid use, pain, EQ-5D-5L scores, mobility, and persistent side effects. If statistically significant advantages are found in the treatment group, perioperative methadone could be considered as standard care for hip fracture patients, potentially enhancing their pain management. The study's outcomes will provide insights into the feasibility and effectiveness of incorporating methadone into routine clinical practices for this patient group.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06086171, submitted 4. October 2023.

Eu-ct: 2023-506252-24-00, UTN: U1111-1294-6125.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing vaccine clinical trials participation among elderly: challenges and strategies. How to improve the quality of euglycemic glucose clamp tests in long-acting insulin studies. Assessing the effectiveness and the feasibility of a group-based treatment for self-stigma in people with mental disorders in routine mental health services in North-East Italy: study protocol for a pragmatic multisite randomized controlled trial. Distribution of trial registry numbers within full-text of PubMed Central articles: implications for linking trials to publications and indexing trial publication types. The impact of vitamin E supplementation on sperm analysis in varicocelectomy patients: a triple-blind randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1