Hanne Irene Jensen, Sarah Leeth Hansen Farmer, Lillian Oxholm Skaarup, Anders Løkke, Anette Hygum, Mette Jo Ipsen, Lisbeth Høilund Gamst, Maybritt Brunsgård Klausen
{"title":"开发和测试一种通用的临终关怀患者决策辅助工具。","authors":"Hanne Irene Jensen, Sarah Leeth Hansen Farmer, Lillian Oxholm Skaarup, Anders Løkke, Anette Hygum, Mette Jo Ipsen, Lisbeth Høilund Gamst, Maybritt Brunsgård Klausen","doi":"10.1016/j.pec.2024.108608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to develop and test a patient decision aid for end-of-life care to be used when some or all life-sustaining treatments have been withheld or withdrawn.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-professional, multi-sectorial group together with patients and relatives used a systematic process to develop and test the patient decision aid, including alpha and beta testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Healthcare professionals, patients and relatives were involved in the development and testing. The final Decision Helper included three areas with nine options: follow-up (outpatient clinic and general practitioner), palliative care (primary care, specialised palliative care team, hospital admission and hospice) and treatment level (intensive care, resuscitation attempt and nutrition via feeding tube). Most participants agreed that the amount of information in the Decision Helper was appropriate, that it clearly presented benefits and disadvantages and that it was useful in the value clarification process, helping to verbalise preferences and what is most important for patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most patients and healthcare professionals found that the decision aid would be helpful in facilitating shared decision-making in an end-of-life conversation.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>The decision aid will be usable in different healthcare setting ensuring that end-of-life care is in accordance with patients' wishes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49714,"journal":{"name":"Patient Education and Counseling","volume":"132 ","pages":"108608"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and testing of a generic patient decision aid for end-of-life care.\",\"authors\":\"Hanne Irene Jensen, Sarah Leeth Hansen Farmer, Lillian Oxholm Skaarup, Anders Løkke, Anette Hygum, Mette Jo Ipsen, Lisbeth Høilund Gamst, Maybritt Brunsgård Klausen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pec.2024.108608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to develop and test a patient decision aid for end-of-life care to be used when some or all life-sustaining treatments have been withheld or withdrawn.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-professional, multi-sectorial group together with patients and relatives used a systematic process to develop and test the patient decision aid, including alpha and beta testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Healthcare professionals, patients and relatives were involved in the development and testing. The final Decision Helper included three areas with nine options: follow-up (outpatient clinic and general practitioner), palliative care (primary care, specialised palliative care team, hospital admission and hospice) and treatment level (intensive care, resuscitation attempt and nutrition via feeding tube). Most participants agreed that the amount of information in the Decision Helper was appropriate, that it clearly presented benefits and disadvantages and that it was useful in the value clarification process, helping to verbalise preferences and what is most important for patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most patients and healthcare professionals found that the decision aid would be helpful in facilitating shared decision-making in an end-of-life conversation.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>The decision aid will be usable in different healthcare setting ensuring that end-of-life care is in accordance with patients' wishes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient Education and Counseling\",\"volume\":\"132 \",\"pages\":\"108608\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient Education and Counseling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2024.108608\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Education and Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2024.108608","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development and testing of a generic patient decision aid for end-of-life care.
Objectives: The objective of this study was to develop and test a patient decision aid for end-of-life care to be used when some or all life-sustaining treatments have been withheld or withdrawn.
Methods: A multi-professional, multi-sectorial group together with patients and relatives used a systematic process to develop and test the patient decision aid, including alpha and beta testing.
Results: Healthcare professionals, patients and relatives were involved in the development and testing. The final Decision Helper included three areas with nine options: follow-up (outpatient clinic and general practitioner), palliative care (primary care, specialised palliative care team, hospital admission and hospice) and treatment level (intensive care, resuscitation attempt and nutrition via feeding tube). Most participants agreed that the amount of information in the Decision Helper was appropriate, that it clearly presented benefits and disadvantages and that it was useful in the value clarification process, helping to verbalise preferences and what is most important for patients.
Conclusions: Most patients and healthcare professionals found that the decision aid would be helpful in facilitating shared decision-making in an end-of-life conversation.
Practice implications: The decision aid will be usable in different healthcare setting ensuring that end-of-life care is in accordance with patients' wishes.
期刊介绍:
Patient Education and Counseling is an interdisciplinary, international journal for patient education and health promotion researchers, managers and clinicians. The journal seeks to explore and elucidate the educational, counseling and communication models in health care. Its aim is to provide a forum for fundamental as well as applied research, and to promote the study of organizational issues involved with the delivery of patient education, counseling, health promotion services and training models in improving communication between providers and patients.