Muhammad Ahsan , Fizza Jahangir , Saira Rathore , Mahrukh Mumtaz , Samina Zaman
{"title":"整片成像诊断冰冻切片的评价。","authors":"Muhammad Ahsan , Fizza Jahangir , Saira Rathore , Mahrukh Mumtaz , Samina Zaman","doi":"10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2024.152431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A promising application of digital pathology is the use of Whole slide imaging (WSI) for rapid and remote intraoperative consultations. Based on recommendations from the College of American Pathologists, we compared diagnostic accuracy and technical analysis of WSI with optical microscopy (OM) for reporting frozen sections (FS). A series of 105 consecutive FS cases were included in our study and were categorized as primary diagnosis, assessment of margin status, and lymph node status. A surgical pathologist reviewed all WSI digital slides of FS cases online and their corresponding glass slides using OM after a 2-week washout period. Technical and diagnostic parameters for remote reporting of frozen sections using WSI were compared to routine OM. Diagnostic agreement between WSI and OM in the FS cases was 100 %. In comparison with the reference standard (original sign-out diagnosis), the overall diagnostic accuracy of WSI and OM was 99.04 %. Scan time per slide averaged 103.89 s. Mean diagnostic assessment time for OM was 17.48 s, while it was 26.62 s for WSI, with a mean difference of 9.14 s (<em>P</em> < .001). The overall mean turnaround time was 3.8 min for reporting a single slide using WSI based digital pathology system. The diagnostic accuracy of WSI is comparable to that of conventional OM. Therefore, we conclude that WSI based digital pathology systems can be safely implemented and integrated into a laboratory workflow as an alternative to conventional OM.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50768,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Diagnostic Pathology","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 152431"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of whole-slide imaging for diagnosing frozen sections\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Ahsan , Fizza Jahangir , Saira Rathore , Mahrukh Mumtaz , Samina Zaman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2024.152431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A promising application of digital pathology is the use of Whole slide imaging (WSI) for rapid and remote intraoperative consultations. Based on recommendations from the College of American Pathologists, we compared diagnostic accuracy and technical analysis of WSI with optical microscopy (OM) for reporting frozen sections (FS). A series of 105 consecutive FS cases were included in our study and were categorized as primary diagnosis, assessment of margin status, and lymph node status. A surgical pathologist reviewed all WSI digital slides of FS cases online and their corresponding glass slides using OM after a 2-week washout period. Technical and diagnostic parameters for remote reporting of frozen sections using WSI were compared to routine OM. Diagnostic agreement between WSI and OM in the FS cases was 100 %. In comparison with the reference standard (original sign-out diagnosis), the overall diagnostic accuracy of WSI and OM was 99.04 %. Scan time per slide averaged 103.89 s. Mean diagnostic assessment time for OM was 17.48 s, while it was 26.62 s for WSI, with a mean difference of 9.14 s (<em>P</em> < .001). The overall mean turnaround time was 3.8 min for reporting a single slide using WSI based digital pathology system. The diagnostic accuracy of WSI is comparable to that of conventional OM. Therefore, we conclude that WSI based digital pathology systems can be safely implemented and integrated into a laboratory workflow as an alternative to conventional OM.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Diagnostic Pathology\",\"volume\":\"75 \",\"pages\":\"Article 152431\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Diagnostic Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1092913424001680\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Diagnostic Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1092913424001680","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
数字病理学的一个有前途的应用是使用全切片成像(WSI)快速和远程术中咨询。根据美国病理学家学会的建议,我们比较了WSI与光学显微镜(OM)报告冷冻切片(FS)的诊断准确性和技术分析。我们的研究纳入了105例连续的FS病例,并将其分为初步诊断、边缘状态评估和淋巴结状态。外科病理学家在2周的洗脱期后回顾了所有FS病例的WSI数字切片和相应的OM玻璃切片。使用WSI远程报告冷冻切片的技术和诊断参数与常规OM进行了比较。在FS病例中,WSI和OM的诊断一致性为100%。与参考标准(原签出诊断)相比,WSI和OM的总体诊断准确率为99.04%。每张幻灯片平均扫描时间为103.89秒。OM的平均诊断评估时间为17.48 s, WSI的平均诊断评估时间为26.62 s,平均差异为9.14 s (P < 0.05)
Evaluation of whole-slide imaging for diagnosing frozen sections
A promising application of digital pathology is the use of Whole slide imaging (WSI) for rapid and remote intraoperative consultations. Based on recommendations from the College of American Pathologists, we compared diagnostic accuracy and technical analysis of WSI with optical microscopy (OM) for reporting frozen sections (FS). A series of 105 consecutive FS cases were included in our study and were categorized as primary diagnosis, assessment of margin status, and lymph node status. A surgical pathologist reviewed all WSI digital slides of FS cases online and their corresponding glass slides using OM after a 2-week washout period. Technical and diagnostic parameters for remote reporting of frozen sections using WSI were compared to routine OM. Diagnostic agreement between WSI and OM in the FS cases was 100 %. In comparison with the reference standard (original sign-out diagnosis), the overall diagnostic accuracy of WSI and OM was 99.04 %. Scan time per slide averaged 103.89 s. Mean diagnostic assessment time for OM was 17.48 s, while it was 26.62 s for WSI, with a mean difference of 9.14 s (P < .001). The overall mean turnaround time was 3.8 min for reporting a single slide using WSI based digital pathology system. The diagnostic accuracy of WSI is comparable to that of conventional OM. Therefore, we conclude that WSI based digital pathology systems can be safely implemented and integrated into a laboratory workflow as an alternative to conventional OM.
期刊介绍:
A peer-reviewed journal devoted to the publication of articles dealing with traditional morphologic studies using standard diagnostic techniques and stressing clinicopathological correlations and scientific observation of relevance to the daily practice of pathology. Special features include pathologic-radiologic correlations and pathologic-cytologic correlations.