基于实现技术和环境目标分析最小生态流量制度的建议:塔霍河流域案例研究(西班牙)

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Earth Sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1007/s12665-024-12024-z
Domingo Baeza Sanz, Beatriz Larraz Iribas, Patricia Chacón Calvo
{"title":"基于实现技术和环境目标分析最小生态流量制度的建议:塔霍河流域案例研究(西班牙)","authors":"Domingo Baeza Sanz,&nbsp;Beatriz Larraz Iribas,&nbsp;Patricia Chacón Calvo","doi":"10.1007/s12665-024-12024-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An environmental flow (e-flow) regime is designed to mitigate the effects of hydrological changes on rivers and to achieve good environmental status of a river as required by the Water Framework Directive (WFD). Once the components of an e-flow regime have been defined, it is important to verify that it meets its objectives, ideally through field sampling. However, field sampling is often avoided due to its high cost and time demands. This paper presents a methodology for validating a proposed river flow regime prior to implementation, allowing its suitability to be assessed without the costs and delays associated with monitoring and ecosystem response studies. The method includes a hydrological process that compares the official flow regime with the natural regime, and a hydraulic simulation process that tests the flow regime in terms of habitability for fauna. The method is tested on four reaches of the Tagus River, which have undergone significant hydrological alterations, using two different environmental flow regime proposals: one official and the other proposed by the authors. The results show a significant reduction in the annual inflows under the official e-flow regime compared to the natural ones (about 25% of the natural total), as well as a simplification of the seasonal flow variation in all river reaches. In addition, the study shows that at the minimum flows proposed in the official regime, three of the stretches would experience conditions that may impede fish migration. This method of inspecting e-flows can be useful for testing mitigation measures for hydrological changes in the very early stages of their application.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proposal for analysis of minimum ecological flow regimes based on the achievement of technical and environmental objectives: Tagus River basin case study (Spain)\",\"authors\":\"Domingo Baeza Sanz,&nbsp;Beatriz Larraz Iribas,&nbsp;Patricia Chacón Calvo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12665-024-12024-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>An environmental flow (e-flow) regime is designed to mitigate the effects of hydrological changes on rivers and to achieve good environmental status of a river as required by the Water Framework Directive (WFD). Once the components of an e-flow regime have been defined, it is important to verify that it meets its objectives, ideally through field sampling. However, field sampling is often avoided due to its high cost and time demands. This paper presents a methodology for validating a proposed river flow regime prior to implementation, allowing its suitability to be assessed without the costs and delays associated with monitoring and ecosystem response studies. The method includes a hydrological process that compares the official flow regime with the natural regime, and a hydraulic simulation process that tests the flow regime in terms of habitability for fauna. The method is tested on four reaches of the Tagus River, which have undergone significant hydrological alterations, using two different environmental flow regime proposals: one official and the other proposed by the authors. The results show a significant reduction in the annual inflows under the official e-flow regime compared to the natural ones (about 25% of the natural total), as well as a simplification of the seasonal flow variation in all river reaches. In addition, the study shows that at the minimum flows proposed in the official regime, three of the stretches would experience conditions that may impede fish migration. This method of inspecting e-flows can be useful for testing mitigation measures for hydrological changes in the very early stages of their application.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-024-12024-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-024-12024-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

环境流量(e-flow)制度旨在减轻水文变化对河流的影响,并按照水框架指令(WFD)的要求实现河流的良好环境状态。一旦确定了电子流量制度的组成部分,重要的是要验证它是否符合其目标,最好是通过现场抽样。然而,由于成本和时间要求高,往往避免现场采样。本文提出了一种在实施之前验证拟议的河流流量状况的方法,允许评估其适用性,而无需与监测和生态系统响应研究相关的成本和延迟。该方法包括一个水文过程,将官方流量制度与自然制度进行比较,以及一个水力模拟过程,根据动物的可居住性测试流量制度。该方法在经历了重大水文变化的塔霍河的四条河段上进行了测试,使用了两种不同的环境流量制度建议:一种是官方的,另一种是作者提出的。结果表明,与自然流量相比,官方电子流量制度下的年流入量显著减少(约占自然总量的25%),并且简化了所有河流的季节流量变化。此外,研究表明,在官方规定的最小流量下,其中三个延伸段可能会遇到阻碍鱼类洄游的条件。这种检查电子流量的方法可用于在应用的早期阶段测试水文变化缓解措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Proposal for analysis of minimum ecological flow regimes based on the achievement of technical and environmental objectives: Tagus River basin case study (Spain)

An environmental flow (e-flow) regime is designed to mitigate the effects of hydrological changes on rivers and to achieve good environmental status of a river as required by the Water Framework Directive (WFD). Once the components of an e-flow regime have been defined, it is important to verify that it meets its objectives, ideally through field sampling. However, field sampling is often avoided due to its high cost and time demands. This paper presents a methodology for validating a proposed river flow regime prior to implementation, allowing its suitability to be assessed without the costs and delays associated with monitoring and ecosystem response studies. The method includes a hydrological process that compares the official flow regime with the natural regime, and a hydraulic simulation process that tests the flow regime in terms of habitability for fauna. The method is tested on four reaches of the Tagus River, which have undergone significant hydrological alterations, using two different environmental flow regime proposals: one official and the other proposed by the authors. The results show a significant reduction in the annual inflows under the official e-flow regime compared to the natural ones (about 25% of the natural total), as well as a simplification of the seasonal flow variation in all river reaches. In addition, the study shows that at the minimum flows proposed in the official regime, three of the stretches would experience conditions that may impede fish migration. This method of inspecting e-flows can be useful for testing mitigation measures for hydrological changes in the very early stages of their application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Earth Sciences
Environmental Earth Sciences 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
494
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth: Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of soil erosion processes by applying IntErO model within the Mkhdach catchment (Middle Atlas of Morocco) Using geographic information methodology to identify aquifer recharge Deep learning techniques for hyperspectral imaging classification: challenges and opportunities Transboundary hydrogeology and controlling factors of euphrates water chemistry: Insights from hydrochemistry, stable isotopes, and residence times in Syria and Western Iraq Investigation on the overtopping failure of moraine dams under avalanche-induced surge waves
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1