{"title":"基于实现技术和环境目标分析最小生态流量制度的建议:塔霍河流域案例研究(西班牙)","authors":"Domingo Baeza Sanz, Beatriz Larraz Iribas, Patricia Chacón Calvo","doi":"10.1007/s12665-024-12024-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An environmental flow (e-flow) regime is designed to mitigate the effects of hydrological changes on rivers and to achieve good environmental status of a river as required by the Water Framework Directive (WFD). Once the components of an e-flow regime have been defined, it is important to verify that it meets its objectives, ideally through field sampling. However, field sampling is often avoided due to its high cost and time demands. This paper presents a methodology for validating a proposed river flow regime prior to implementation, allowing its suitability to be assessed without the costs and delays associated with monitoring and ecosystem response studies. The method includes a hydrological process that compares the official flow regime with the natural regime, and a hydraulic simulation process that tests the flow regime in terms of habitability for fauna. The method is tested on four reaches of the Tagus River, which have undergone significant hydrological alterations, using two different environmental flow regime proposals: one official and the other proposed by the authors. The results show a significant reduction in the annual inflows under the official e-flow regime compared to the natural ones (about 25% of the natural total), as well as a simplification of the seasonal flow variation in all river reaches. In addition, the study shows that at the minimum flows proposed in the official regime, three of the stretches would experience conditions that may impede fish migration. This method of inspecting e-flows can be useful for testing mitigation measures for hydrological changes in the very early stages of their application.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proposal for analysis of minimum ecological flow regimes based on the achievement of technical and environmental objectives: Tagus River basin case study (Spain)\",\"authors\":\"Domingo Baeza Sanz, Beatriz Larraz Iribas, Patricia Chacón Calvo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12665-024-12024-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>An environmental flow (e-flow) regime is designed to mitigate the effects of hydrological changes on rivers and to achieve good environmental status of a river as required by the Water Framework Directive (WFD). Once the components of an e-flow regime have been defined, it is important to verify that it meets its objectives, ideally through field sampling. However, field sampling is often avoided due to its high cost and time demands. This paper presents a methodology for validating a proposed river flow regime prior to implementation, allowing its suitability to be assessed without the costs and delays associated with monitoring and ecosystem response studies. The method includes a hydrological process that compares the official flow regime with the natural regime, and a hydraulic simulation process that tests the flow regime in terms of habitability for fauna. The method is tested on four reaches of the Tagus River, which have undergone significant hydrological alterations, using two different environmental flow regime proposals: one official and the other proposed by the authors. The results show a significant reduction in the annual inflows under the official e-flow regime compared to the natural ones (about 25% of the natural total), as well as a simplification of the seasonal flow variation in all river reaches. In addition, the study shows that at the minimum flows proposed in the official regime, three of the stretches would experience conditions that may impede fish migration. This method of inspecting e-flows can be useful for testing mitigation measures for hydrological changes in the very early stages of their application.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-024-12024-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-024-12024-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Proposal for analysis of minimum ecological flow regimes based on the achievement of technical and environmental objectives: Tagus River basin case study (Spain)
An environmental flow (e-flow) regime is designed to mitigate the effects of hydrological changes on rivers and to achieve good environmental status of a river as required by the Water Framework Directive (WFD). Once the components of an e-flow regime have been defined, it is important to verify that it meets its objectives, ideally through field sampling. However, field sampling is often avoided due to its high cost and time demands. This paper presents a methodology for validating a proposed river flow regime prior to implementation, allowing its suitability to be assessed without the costs and delays associated with monitoring and ecosystem response studies. The method includes a hydrological process that compares the official flow regime with the natural regime, and a hydraulic simulation process that tests the flow regime in terms of habitability for fauna. The method is tested on four reaches of the Tagus River, which have undergone significant hydrological alterations, using two different environmental flow regime proposals: one official and the other proposed by the authors. The results show a significant reduction in the annual inflows under the official e-flow regime compared to the natural ones (about 25% of the natural total), as well as a simplification of the seasonal flow variation in all river reaches. In addition, the study shows that at the minimum flows proposed in the official regime, three of the stretches would experience conditions that may impede fish migration. This method of inspecting e-flows can be useful for testing mitigation measures for hydrological changes in the very early stages of their application.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth:
Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices
Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water
Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans
Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards
Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth
Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources
Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials
Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems
Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment
In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.