术中OCT评价不同巩膜内固定技术下椎体人工晶状体的稳定性和对中性。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY European Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-12-22 DOI:10.1177/11206721241306777
Gregorio Lo Giudice, Claudio Brancato, Maura Mancini, Antonino Pioppo, Aurelio Imburgia
{"title":"术中OCT评价不同巩膜内固定技术下椎体人工晶状体的稳定性和对中性。","authors":"Gregorio Lo Giudice, Claudio Brancato, Maura Mancini, Antonino Pioppo, Aurelio Imburgia","doi":"10.1177/11206721241306777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate intrascleral plug stability and correct centring of the IOL in three different surgical techniques using intraoperative anterior segment OCT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective scientific study was conducted by reviewing patient records from the Ophthalmology Unit at the Civico Hospital of Palermo, covering the period between 2021 and 2022. Three distinct groups of patients, each consisting of 7 eyes from 7 individual patients, were included in this study. The first group received a quadrangular scleral flap (3.5 × 3.5 mm) that covered intrascleral plugs. The second group had two intrascleral pockets created with the insertion of plugs inside these pockets. The third group had one intrascleral pocket created to cover the intrascleral plugs. Intraoperative anterior segment (AS)-OCT was used to monitor the positioning of the plugs and the tilt of the IOL. The analyzed parameters are: best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), subjective refraction, intraocular pressure (IOP), pachymetry, macular thickness, endothelial cell loss, intraoperative and postoperative complications, IOL tilting, and optic plate decentration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The examined parameters showed uniformity among the groups. Postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), subjective refraction, intraocular pressure (IOP), pachymetry, and macular thickness exhibited no significant differences between the three groups. Endothelial cell loss ranged between 10.4% and 13.1% across the patient groups. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were reported. No IOL tilting or optic plate decentration was reported. The duration of surgeries was similar among the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The three different scleral fixation techniques have been shown to be equally effective, demonstrating the usefulness of intraoperative AS-OCT for the stability and centring of Carlevale IOLs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12000,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"11206721241306777"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative OCT evaluation of the stability and centering of carlevale IOL with different intrascleral fixation techniques.\",\"authors\":\"Gregorio Lo Giudice, Claudio Brancato, Maura Mancini, Antonino Pioppo, Aurelio Imburgia\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11206721241306777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate intrascleral plug stability and correct centring of the IOL in three different surgical techniques using intraoperative anterior segment OCT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective scientific study was conducted by reviewing patient records from the Ophthalmology Unit at the Civico Hospital of Palermo, covering the period between 2021 and 2022. Three distinct groups of patients, each consisting of 7 eyes from 7 individual patients, were included in this study. The first group received a quadrangular scleral flap (3.5 × 3.5 mm) that covered intrascleral plugs. The second group had two intrascleral pockets created with the insertion of plugs inside these pockets. The third group had one intrascleral pocket created to cover the intrascleral plugs. Intraoperative anterior segment (AS)-OCT was used to monitor the positioning of the plugs and the tilt of the IOL. The analyzed parameters are: best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), subjective refraction, intraocular pressure (IOP), pachymetry, macular thickness, endothelial cell loss, intraoperative and postoperative complications, IOL tilting, and optic plate decentration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The examined parameters showed uniformity among the groups. Postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), subjective refraction, intraocular pressure (IOP), pachymetry, and macular thickness exhibited no significant differences between the three groups. Endothelial cell loss ranged between 10.4% and 13.1% across the patient groups. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were reported. No IOL tilting or optic plate decentration was reported. The duration of surgeries was similar among the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The three different scleral fixation techniques have been shown to be equally effective, demonstrating the usefulness of intraoperative AS-OCT for the stability and centring of Carlevale IOLs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"11206721241306777\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721241306777\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721241306777","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为了评估三种不同手术技术中巩膜内眼塞的稳定性和人工晶状体的正确定位。方法:本回顾性科学研究通过回顾巴勒莫Civico医院眼科部门2021年至2022年的患者记录进行。本研究包括三组不同的患者,每组由7名患者的7只眼睛组成。第一组接受覆盖巩膜内塞的四边形巩膜瓣(3.5 × 3.5 mm)。第二组有两个巩膜内口袋,在口袋里插入了插头。第三组有一个巩膜内袋来覆盖巩膜内塞。术中应用前段oct监测人工晶体塞的定位和人工晶体的倾斜。分析的参数有:最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、主观屈光、眼内压(IOP)、测厚、黄斑厚度、内皮细胞丢失、术中及术后并发症、IOL倾斜、视板脱位。结果:各组间检测参数具有一致性。术后最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、主观屈光、眼内压(IOP)、视厚测量、黄斑厚度在三组间无显著差异。内皮细胞损失在10.4%到13.1%之间。术中及术后无并发症。未见人工晶状体倾斜或视板移位。两组间手术持续时间相似。结论:三种不同的巩膜固定技术已被证明是同样有效的,这表明术中AS-OCT对Carlevale iol的稳定性和定心是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intraoperative OCT evaluation of the stability and centering of carlevale IOL with different intrascleral fixation techniques.

Background: To evaluate intrascleral plug stability and correct centring of the IOL in three different surgical techniques using intraoperative anterior segment OCT.

Methods: This retrospective scientific study was conducted by reviewing patient records from the Ophthalmology Unit at the Civico Hospital of Palermo, covering the period between 2021 and 2022. Three distinct groups of patients, each consisting of 7 eyes from 7 individual patients, were included in this study. The first group received a quadrangular scleral flap (3.5 × 3.5 mm) that covered intrascleral plugs. The second group had two intrascleral pockets created with the insertion of plugs inside these pockets. The third group had one intrascleral pocket created to cover the intrascleral plugs. Intraoperative anterior segment (AS)-OCT was used to monitor the positioning of the plugs and the tilt of the IOL. The analyzed parameters are: best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), subjective refraction, intraocular pressure (IOP), pachymetry, macular thickness, endothelial cell loss, intraoperative and postoperative complications, IOL tilting, and optic plate decentration.

Results: The examined parameters showed uniformity among the groups. Postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), subjective refraction, intraocular pressure (IOP), pachymetry, and macular thickness exhibited no significant differences between the three groups. Endothelial cell loss ranged between 10.4% and 13.1% across the patient groups. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were reported. No IOL tilting or optic plate decentration was reported. The duration of surgeries was similar among the groups.

Conclusions: The three different scleral fixation techniques have been shown to be equally effective, demonstrating the usefulness of intraoperative AS-OCT for the stability and centring of Carlevale IOLs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
372
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Ophthalmology was founded in 1991 and is issued in print bi-monthly. It publishes only peer-reviewed original research reporting clinical observations and laboratory investigations with clinical relevance focusing on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, results of clinical trials and research findings.
期刊最新文献
Dual lamellar keratoplasty combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular Lens implantation in a case of severe chemical burn. Real-world evidence of anti-VEGF therapies in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration in Italy: The RADIANCE study. Successful management of drug-resistant rhizobium radiobacter endophthalmitis: A case report. One-year results of double site versus single site rigid probe viscotrabeculotomy in primary congenital glaucoma. Value of MRI-based radiomics models for predicting visual outcome in patients with MOG-optic neuritis: A preliminary study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1