数字干预对改善美国成年人DASH和血压的影响

IF 6.9 1区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Hypertension Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.23887
Hailey N Miller, Sandy Askew, Miriam B Berger, Melissa C Kay, Anushka Palipana, Elizabeth Trefney, Loneke T Blackman Carr, Cherie Barnes, Crystal C Tyson, Laura P Svetkey, Ryan Shaw, Dori M Steinberg, Qing Yang, Gary G Bennett
{"title":"数字干预对改善美国成年人DASH和血压的影响","authors":"Hailey N Miller, Sandy Askew, Miriam B Berger, Melissa C Kay, Anushka Palipana, Elizabeth Trefney, Loneke T Blackman Carr, Cherie Barnes, Crystal C Tyson, Laura P Svetkey, Ryan Shaw, Dori M Steinberg, Qing Yang, Gary G Bennett","doi":"10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.23887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) is a recommended first-line treatment for adults with hypertension, yet adherence to DASH is low. To evaluate the efficacy of a digital health intervention (DHI), compared with attention control, on changes in DASH adherence and blood pressure among adults with hypertension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nourish was a 12-month, parallel, 2-arm, randomized controlled trial of a virtually delivered DHI. Participants had a previous diagnosis of hypertension. The primary outcome was a 6-month change in DASH adherence. The secondary outcome was a change in blood pressure. We used linear mixed models to compare 6 and 12-month changes in DASH adherence, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nourish randomized 301 adults who averaged 54.4 (SD, 13.4) years and predominately identified as female (65%), White (53%), or Black (31%). Adjusted mean baseline DASH score was 2.30 (95% CI, 2.03-2.58). The adjusted mean baseline systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were 123.2 (95% CI, 119.5-126.9) and 77.1 (95% CI, 74.6-79.6) mm Hg. DASH score change was not significantly different between arms at 6 months (<i>M</i><sub>diff</sub>, 0.02 [95% CI, -0.37 to 0.40]). Yet, DHI participants had significantly greater 12-month changes in DASH score, relative to control (<i>M</i><sub>diff</sub>, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.16-1.08]). Between-group differences in 6-month changes were insignificant for systolic blood pressure and marginally significant for diastolic blood pressure, despite the DHI group showing significant blood pressure reductions from baseline.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A DHI led to modest improvements in DASH and blood pressure among adults with hypertension but did not outperform the attention control. Further research is needed to understand the utility of DHIs to promote DASH and identify intervention components that support long-term behavior change.</p>","PeriodicalId":13042,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":"370-381"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of a Digital Intervention to Improve DASH and Blood Pressure Among US Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Hailey N Miller, Sandy Askew, Miriam B Berger, Melissa C Kay, Anushka Palipana, Elizabeth Trefney, Loneke T Blackman Carr, Cherie Barnes, Crystal C Tyson, Laura P Svetkey, Ryan Shaw, Dori M Steinberg, Qing Yang, Gary G Bennett\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.23887\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) is a recommended first-line treatment for adults with hypertension, yet adherence to DASH is low. To evaluate the efficacy of a digital health intervention (DHI), compared with attention control, on changes in DASH adherence and blood pressure among adults with hypertension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nourish was a 12-month, parallel, 2-arm, randomized controlled trial of a virtually delivered DHI. Participants had a previous diagnosis of hypertension. The primary outcome was a 6-month change in DASH adherence. The secondary outcome was a change in blood pressure. We used linear mixed models to compare 6 and 12-month changes in DASH adherence, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nourish randomized 301 adults who averaged 54.4 (SD, 13.4) years and predominately identified as female (65%), White (53%), or Black (31%). Adjusted mean baseline DASH score was 2.30 (95% CI, 2.03-2.58). The adjusted mean baseline systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were 123.2 (95% CI, 119.5-126.9) and 77.1 (95% CI, 74.6-79.6) mm Hg. DASH score change was not significantly different between arms at 6 months (<i>M</i><sub>diff</sub>, 0.02 [95% CI, -0.37 to 0.40]). Yet, DHI participants had significantly greater 12-month changes in DASH score, relative to control (<i>M</i><sub>diff</sub>, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.16-1.08]). Between-group differences in 6-month changes were insignificant for systolic blood pressure and marginally significant for diastolic blood pressure, despite the DHI group showing significant blood pressure reductions from baseline.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A DHI led to modest improvements in DASH and blood pressure among adults with hypertension but did not outperform the attention control. Further research is needed to understand the utility of DHIs to promote DASH and identify intervention components that support long-term behavior change.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hypertension\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"370-381\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.23887\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.23887","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:饮食方法抑制高血压(DASH)是成人高血压患者推荐的一线治疗方法,但DASH的依从性很低。目的:评价数字健康干预(DHI)与注意控制相比对高血压成人DASH依从性和血压变化的效果。方法:滋养是一项为期12个月,平行,双臂,随机对照试验的虚拟交付DHI。参与者之前都有高血压的诊断。主要终点是6个月DASH依从性的变化。次要结果是血压的变化。我们使用线性混合模型比较6个月和12个月DASH依从性、收缩压和舒张压的变化。结果:滋养随机抽取了301名成年人,平均年龄为54.4岁(SD, 13.4),主要为女性(65%)、白人(53%)和黑人(31%)。调整后平均基线DASH评分为2.30 (95% CI, 2.03-2.58)。调整后的平均基线收缩压和舒张压分别为123.2 (95% CI, 119.5-126.9)和77.1 (95% CI, 74.6-79.6) mmhg。6个月时各组间DASH评分变化无显著差异(Mdiff, 0.02 [95% CI, -0.37 ~ 0.40])。然而,与对照组相比,DHI参与者在12个月的DASH评分变化明显更大(Mdiff, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.16-1.08])。尽管DHI组的血压较基线有显著降低,但6个月的收缩压组间差异不显著,舒张压组间差异不显著。结论:DHI导致高血压成人患者DASH和血压的适度改善,但没有比注意控制效果更好。需要进一步的研究来了解DHIs在促进DASH方面的作用,并确定支持长期行为改变的干预成分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of a Digital Intervention to Improve DASH and Blood Pressure Among US Adults.

Background: Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) is a recommended first-line treatment for adults with hypertension, yet adherence to DASH is low. To evaluate the efficacy of a digital health intervention (DHI), compared with attention control, on changes in DASH adherence and blood pressure among adults with hypertension.

Methods: Nourish was a 12-month, parallel, 2-arm, randomized controlled trial of a virtually delivered DHI. Participants had a previous diagnosis of hypertension. The primary outcome was a 6-month change in DASH adherence. The secondary outcome was a change in blood pressure. We used linear mixed models to compare 6 and 12-month changes in DASH adherence, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure.

Results: Nourish randomized 301 adults who averaged 54.4 (SD, 13.4) years and predominately identified as female (65%), White (53%), or Black (31%). Adjusted mean baseline DASH score was 2.30 (95% CI, 2.03-2.58). The adjusted mean baseline systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were 123.2 (95% CI, 119.5-126.9) and 77.1 (95% CI, 74.6-79.6) mm Hg. DASH score change was not significantly different between arms at 6 months (Mdiff, 0.02 [95% CI, -0.37 to 0.40]). Yet, DHI participants had significantly greater 12-month changes in DASH score, relative to control (Mdiff, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.16-1.08]). Between-group differences in 6-month changes were insignificant for systolic blood pressure and marginally significant for diastolic blood pressure, despite the DHI group showing significant blood pressure reductions from baseline.

Conclusions: A DHI led to modest improvements in DASH and blood pressure among adults with hypertension but did not outperform the attention control. Further research is needed to understand the utility of DHIs to promote DASH and identify intervention components that support long-term behavior change.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hypertension
Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1006
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Hypertension presents top-tier articles on high blood pressure in each monthly release. These articles delve into basic science, clinical treatment, and prevention of hypertension and associated cardiovascular, metabolic, and renal conditions. Renowned for their lasting significance, these papers contribute to advancing our understanding and management of hypertension-related issues.
期刊最新文献
Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy and Brain Health in Midlife: The CARDIA Study. Irisin Improves Preeclampsia by Promoting Embryo Implantation and Vascular Remodeling. Caregiving and Hypertension in Younger Black Women: The Jackson Heart Study. ACE2, From the Kidney to SARS-CoV-2: Donald Seldin Award Lecture 2023. ATP2A3 in Primary Aldosteronism: Machine Learning-Based Discovery and Functional Validation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1