在有和没有血流限制的深蹲训练中对不同举速的急性反应。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000005021
Pedro Jesús Cornejo-Daza, Juan Sánchez-Valdepeñas, Jose Páez-Maldonado, Luis Rodiles-Guerrero, Miguel Sánchez-Moreno, Gonzálo Gómez-Guerrero, Juan A León-Prados, Fernando Pareja-Blanco
{"title":"在有和没有血流限制的深蹲训练中对不同举速的急性反应。","authors":"Pedro Jesús Cornejo-Daza, Juan Sánchez-Valdepeñas, Jose Páez-Maldonado, Luis Rodiles-Guerrero, Miguel Sánchez-Moreno, Gonzálo Gómez-Guerrero, Juan A León-Prados, Fernando Pareja-Blanco","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Cornejo-Daza, PJ, Sánchez-Valdepeñas, J, Páez-Maldonado, J, Rodiles-Guerrero, L, Sánchez-Moreno, M, Gómez-Guerrero, G, León-Prados, JA, and Pareja-Blanco, F. Acute responses to different lifting velocities during squat training with and without blood flow restriction. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-The aims of the research were to compare the acute mechanical, metabolic, neuromuscular, and muscle mechanical responses to different lifting velocities (maximal vs. half-maximal) under distinct blood flow conditions (free [FF] vs. restricted [BFR]) in full-squat (SQ). Twenty resistance-trained males performed 4 protocols that differed in the velocity at which loads were lifted (MaxV: maximal velocity vs. HalfV: half-maximal velocity) and in the blood flow condition (FF: free-flow vs. BFR: 50% of arterial occlusion pressure). The relative intensity (60% 1 repetition maximum), volume (3 sets of 8 repetitions), and resting time (2 minutes) were matched between protocols. Mean propulsive force (MPF), mean propulsive velocity (MPV), mean propulsive power (MPP), and electromyography (EMG) values were recorded for each repetition. Tensiomyography (TMG), blood lactate, countermovement jump (CMJ), maximal voluntary isometric contraction in 90° SQ, and performance with the load that elicited a 1-m·s-1 velocity at baseline measurements (V1-load) in SQ were assessed at pre-exercise and postexercise. The MaxV protocols showed significantly greater MPF, MPV, MPP, and EMG amplitude during the exercise than the HalfV protocols (velocity effect, p < 0.05). The FF protocols achieved higher MPF and MPP during exercise than BFR (BFR effect, p < 0.05). The BFR protocols induced greater blood lactate after exercise (BFR × time interaction, p = 0.02), along with higher postexercise impairments in mechanical performance (BFR × time interaction, p < 0.05). The MaxV protocols elicited superior performance and greater muscle activation during exercise. The BFR protocols resulted in lower force and power production during exercise and exhibited higher performance impairments and increased metabolic stress postexercise.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute Responses to Different Lifting Velocities During Squat Training With and Without Blood Flow Restriction.\",\"authors\":\"Pedro Jesús Cornejo-Daza, Juan Sánchez-Valdepeñas, Jose Páez-Maldonado, Luis Rodiles-Guerrero, Miguel Sánchez-Moreno, Gonzálo Gómez-Guerrero, Juan A León-Prados, Fernando Pareja-Blanco\",\"doi\":\"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Cornejo-Daza, PJ, Sánchez-Valdepeñas, J, Páez-Maldonado, J, Rodiles-Guerrero, L, Sánchez-Moreno, M, Gómez-Guerrero, G, León-Prados, JA, and Pareja-Blanco, F. Acute responses to different lifting velocities during squat training with and without blood flow restriction. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-The aims of the research were to compare the acute mechanical, metabolic, neuromuscular, and muscle mechanical responses to different lifting velocities (maximal vs. half-maximal) under distinct blood flow conditions (free [FF] vs. restricted [BFR]) in full-squat (SQ). Twenty resistance-trained males performed 4 protocols that differed in the velocity at which loads were lifted (MaxV: maximal velocity vs. HalfV: half-maximal velocity) and in the blood flow condition (FF: free-flow vs. BFR: 50% of arterial occlusion pressure). The relative intensity (60% 1 repetition maximum), volume (3 sets of 8 repetitions), and resting time (2 minutes) were matched between protocols. Mean propulsive force (MPF), mean propulsive velocity (MPV), mean propulsive power (MPP), and electromyography (EMG) values were recorded for each repetition. Tensiomyography (TMG), blood lactate, countermovement jump (CMJ), maximal voluntary isometric contraction in 90° SQ, and performance with the load that elicited a 1-m·s-1 velocity at baseline measurements (V1-load) in SQ were assessed at pre-exercise and postexercise. The MaxV protocols showed significantly greater MPF, MPV, MPP, and EMG amplitude during the exercise than the HalfV protocols (velocity effect, p < 0.05). The FF protocols achieved higher MPF and MPP during exercise than BFR (BFR effect, p < 0.05). The BFR protocols induced greater blood lactate after exercise (BFR × time interaction, p = 0.02), along with higher postexercise impairments in mechanical performance (BFR × time interaction, p < 0.05). The MaxV protocols elicited superior performance and greater muscle activation during exercise. The BFR protocols resulted in lower force and power production during exercise and exhibited higher performance impairments and increased metabolic stress postexercise.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005021\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:Cornejo-Daza, PJ, Sánchez-Valdepeñas, J, Páez-Maldonado, J, Rodiles-Guerrero, L, Sánchez-Moreno, M, Gómez-Guerrero, G, León-Prados, JA, Pareja-Blanco, F.在有和无血流限制的深蹲训练中对不同举速的急性反应。[J]力量杂志,XX(X): 000-000, 2024-本研究的目的是比较在不同血流条件下(自由[FF]与受限[BFR]),全深蹲(SQ)时不同举速(最大与半最大)的急性机械、代谢、神经肌肉和肌肉机械反应。20名受过阻力训练的男性执行了4种不同的负载提升速度(MaxV:最大速度vs. HalfV:最大速度的一半)和血流状况(FF:自由血流vs. BFR:动脉闭塞压的50%)的方案。相对强度(60% 1次最大重复)、体积(3组8次重复)和休息时间(2分钟)在不同方案之间进行匹配。记录每次重复的平均推进力(MPF)、平均推进速度(MPV)、平均推进功率(MPP)和肌电图(EMG)值。在运动前和运动后评估肌张力图(TMG)、血乳酸、反运动跳(CMJ)、90°SQ的最大自主等距收缩,以及SQ基线测量(v1负荷)时1 m·s-1速度的负荷表现。与HalfV方案相比,MaxV方案在运动过程中表现出更大的MPF、MPV、MPP和EMG振幅(速度效应,p < 0.05)。FF方案在运动中的MPF和MPP均高于BFR方案(BFR效应,p < 0.05)。BFR方案导致运动后血乳酸增加(BFR ×时间交互作用,p = 0.02),运动后机械性能受损(BFR ×时间交互作用,p < 0.05)。在运动过程中,MaxV方案引发了卓越的表现和更大的肌肉激活。BFR方案导致运动期间的力量和能量产生降低,表现出更高的表现障碍和运动后代谢应激增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Acute Responses to Different Lifting Velocities During Squat Training With and Without Blood Flow Restriction.

Abstract: Cornejo-Daza, PJ, Sánchez-Valdepeñas, J, Páez-Maldonado, J, Rodiles-Guerrero, L, Sánchez-Moreno, M, Gómez-Guerrero, G, León-Prados, JA, and Pareja-Blanco, F. Acute responses to different lifting velocities during squat training with and without blood flow restriction. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-The aims of the research were to compare the acute mechanical, metabolic, neuromuscular, and muscle mechanical responses to different lifting velocities (maximal vs. half-maximal) under distinct blood flow conditions (free [FF] vs. restricted [BFR]) in full-squat (SQ). Twenty resistance-trained males performed 4 protocols that differed in the velocity at which loads were lifted (MaxV: maximal velocity vs. HalfV: half-maximal velocity) and in the blood flow condition (FF: free-flow vs. BFR: 50% of arterial occlusion pressure). The relative intensity (60% 1 repetition maximum), volume (3 sets of 8 repetitions), and resting time (2 minutes) were matched between protocols. Mean propulsive force (MPF), mean propulsive velocity (MPV), mean propulsive power (MPP), and electromyography (EMG) values were recorded for each repetition. Tensiomyography (TMG), blood lactate, countermovement jump (CMJ), maximal voluntary isometric contraction in 90° SQ, and performance with the load that elicited a 1-m·s-1 velocity at baseline measurements (V1-load) in SQ were assessed at pre-exercise and postexercise. The MaxV protocols showed significantly greater MPF, MPV, MPP, and EMG amplitude during the exercise than the HalfV protocols (velocity effect, p < 0.05). The FF protocols achieved higher MPF and MPP during exercise than BFR (BFR effect, p < 0.05). The BFR protocols induced greater blood lactate after exercise (BFR × time interaction, p = 0.02), along with higher postexercise impairments in mechanical performance (BFR × time interaction, p < 0.05). The MaxV protocols elicited superior performance and greater muscle activation during exercise. The BFR protocols resulted in lower force and power production during exercise and exhibited higher performance impairments and increased metabolic stress postexercise.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
期刊最新文献
Position-Specific Differences in Speed Profiles Among National Football League Scouting Combine Participants. Examining the Influence of Season Phase, Age, and Anthropometrics on Body Composition Trends in National Basketball Association Athletes. Impedance Spectroscopy Measures of Whole and Segmental Skeletal Muscle Quantity Associated With Strength and Power in Collegiate Ice Hockey Players. Peak Lower-Extremity Power Unadjusted for Body Mass Predicts Fastball Velocity in Collegiate Baseball Pitchers. Soft Tissue Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit Revealed Detailed Musculoskeletal Factors of Baseball Players.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1