[对患者数量研究的解释]。

Q4 Medicine Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde Pub Date : 2024-12-26
Rolf H H Groenwold, Arno A W Roest, Frits R Rosendaal
{"title":"[对患者数量研究的解释]。","authors":"Rolf H H Groenwold, Arno A W Roest, Frits R Rosendaal","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Healthcare research into patient volumes and volume-outcome relations can have far-reaching consequences. By means of a thought experiment, five core elements of valid research into patient volumes are identified: variation in numbers of patients, scalability of capacity, comparability regarding quality of care, comparability regarding groups of patients, and statistical precision. Practical challenges are described for each of these aspects as well as their possible impact on research quality. This is illustrated using the example of volume-outcome relations in the field of pediatric cardiac surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":18903,"journal":{"name":"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde","volume":"168 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Interpretation of research on patient volumes].\",\"authors\":\"Rolf H H Groenwold, Arno A W Roest, Frits R Rosendaal\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Healthcare research into patient volumes and volume-outcome relations can have far-reaching consequences. By means of a thought experiment, five core elements of valid research into patient volumes are identified: variation in numbers of patients, scalability of capacity, comparability regarding quality of care, comparability regarding groups of patients, and statistical precision. Practical challenges are described for each of these aspects as well as their possible impact on research quality. This is illustrated using the example of volume-outcome relations in the field of pediatric cardiac surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde\",\"volume\":\"168 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对患者数量和数量-结果关系的医疗保健研究可以产生深远的影响。通过思想实验,确定了对患者数量进行有效研究的五个核心要素:患者数量的变化、容量的可扩展性、护理质量的可比性、患者群体的可比性和统计精度。本文描述了这些方面的实际挑战以及它们对研究质量可能产生的影响。这是用体积-结果关系的例子说明在儿科心脏外科领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Interpretation of research on patient volumes].

Healthcare research into patient volumes and volume-outcome relations can have far-reaching consequences. By means of a thought experiment, five core elements of valid research into patient volumes are identified: variation in numbers of patients, scalability of capacity, comparability regarding quality of care, comparability regarding groups of patients, and statistical precision. Practical challenges are described for each of these aspects as well as their possible impact on research quality. This is illustrated using the example of volume-outcome relations in the field of pediatric cardiac surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde
Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Het NTVG staat bekend als hét wetenschappelijke algemene medische tijdschrift. De lange historie en de degelijkheid maken het tijdschrift tot een bolwerk van medische wetenschap in druk. Ook door de goede leesbaarheid draagt het tijdschrift bij aan de voortdurende dialoog over de geneeskunde.
期刊最新文献
[Dealing with deep uncertainty during a pandemic; make policies adaptive]. [Neurological side-effects associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors]. [Residency attrition in orthopaedic surgery; an explanatory model based on qualitative research]. ['More research is needed' is a meaningless conclusion]. [Shaking hands or not after the COVID pandemic?]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1