重度抑郁症的实施科学现状:述评。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Psychiatry Research Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116330
Yuru He , Jill K. Murphy , Xing Wang , Erin E. Michalak , Tao Yang , Xiaorui Yang , Jing Liu , Yiru Fang , Raymond W. Lam , Jun Chen
{"title":"重度抑郁症的实施科学现状:述评。","authors":"Yuru He ,&nbsp;Jill K. Murphy ,&nbsp;Xing Wang ,&nbsp;Erin E. Michalak ,&nbsp;Tao Yang ,&nbsp;Xiaorui Yang ,&nbsp;Jing Liu ,&nbsp;Yiru Fang ,&nbsp;Raymond W. Lam ,&nbsp;Jun Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the most prevalent and disabling mental disorders with high recurrence rate. There is often a gap between scientific evidence related to the effective and cost-effective treatment of depression and clinical practice. Implementation science is a field of inquiry that aims to advance the process of applying evidence-based interventions to real-world problems. Implementation research consists of two broad phases. The first phase seeks to identify the gaps that exist between evidence and practice and their impact on outcomes. The second phase, building on the first, evaluates the effectiveness of implementation strategies by examining various implementation indicators to support the adoption and scale up of interventions. Although implementation research can facilitate the uptake and adoption of evidence-based interventions, it is underused in depression research. In this narrative review, the authors will introduce the definition of implementation science and the state of implementation science in MDD in order to support more widespread use of implementation science for scaling up evidence-based interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20819,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Research","volume":"344 ","pages":"Article 116330"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The state of implementation science in major depressive disorder: A narrative review\",\"authors\":\"Yuru He ,&nbsp;Jill K. Murphy ,&nbsp;Xing Wang ,&nbsp;Erin E. Michalak ,&nbsp;Tao Yang ,&nbsp;Xiaorui Yang ,&nbsp;Jing Liu ,&nbsp;Yiru Fang ,&nbsp;Raymond W. Lam ,&nbsp;Jun Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the most prevalent and disabling mental disorders with high recurrence rate. There is often a gap between scientific evidence related to the effective and cost-effective treatment of depression and clinical practice. Implementation science is a field of inquiry that aims to advance the process of applying evidence-based interventions to real-world problems. Implementation research consists of two broad phases. The first phase seeks to identify the gaps that exist between evidence and practice and their impact on outcomes. The second phase, building on the first, evaluates the effectiveness of implementation strategies by examining various implementation indicators to support the adoption and scale up of interventions. Although implementation research can facilitate the uptake and adoption of evidence-based interventions, it is underused in depression research. In this narrative review, the authors will introduce the definition of implementation science and the state of implementation science in MDD in order to support more widespread use of implementation science for scaling up evidence-based interventions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatry Research\",\"volume\":\"344 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116330\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatry Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165178124006152\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165178124006152","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重度抑郁症(MDD)是最常见、致残性精神障碍之一,复发率高。与有效和具有成本效益的抑郁症治疗有关的科学证据与临床实践之间往往存在差距。实施科学是一个探究领域,旨在推进将基于证据的干预措施应用于现实世界问题的过程。实施研究包括两个广泛的阶段。第一阶段旨在确定证据与实践之间存在的差距及其对结果的影响。第二阶段在第一阶段的基础上,通过审查各种实施指标来评估实施战略的有效性,以支持采取和扩大干预措施。尽管实施研究可以促进以证据为基础的干预措施的吸收和采用,但在抑郁症研究中尚未得到充分利用。在这篇叙述性综述中,作者将介绍实施科学的定义和MDD中实施科学的现状,以支持更广泛地使用实施科学来扩大基于证据的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The state of implementation science in major depressive disorder: A narrative review
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the most prevalent and disabling mental disorders with high recurrence rate. There is often a gap between scientific evidence related to the effective and cost-effective treatment of depression and clinical practice. Implementation science is a field of inquiry that aims to advance the process of applying evidence-based interventions to real-world problems. Implementation research consists of two broad phases. The first phase seeks to identify the gaps that exist between evidence and practice and their impact on outcomes. The second phase, building on the first, evaluates the effectiveness of implementation strategies by examining various implementation indicators to support the adoption and scale up of interventions. Although implementation research can facilitate the uptake and adoption of evidence-based interventions, it is underused in depression research. In this narrative review, the authors will introduce the definition of implementation science and the state of implementation science in MDD in order to support more widespread use of implementation science for scaling up evidence-based interventions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatry Research
Psychiatry Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
527
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Psychiatry Research offers swift publication of comprehensive research reports and reviews within the field of psychiatry. The scope of the journal encompasses: Biochemical, physiological, neuroanatomic, genetic, neurocognitive, and psychosocial determinants of psychiatric disorders. Diagnostic assessments of psychiatric disorders. Evaluations that pursue hypotheses about the cause or causes of psychiatric diseases. Evaluations of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic psychiatric treatments. Basic neuroscience studies related to animal or neurochemical models for psychiatric disorders. Methodological advances, such as instrumentation, clinical scales, and assays directly applicable to psychiatric research.
期刊最新文献
Exploring cognitive symptoms in patients with unipolar and bipolar major depression: A comparative evaluation of subjective and objective performance Editorial Board Absence of nonfatal suicidal behavior preceding suicide death reveals differences in clinical risks A systematic review of the etiology and neurobiology of intermittent explosive disorder Mental health clinicians’ practices and perspectives of eating disorder apps
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1