基于活动的支付系统(T2A)的改革如何有助于创新卫生产品的融资?

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Therapie Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.therap.2024.10.063
Xavier Armoiry, Nejma Saidani, Martine Aoustin, Dorothée Camus, Auriane Cano-Chancel, Sophie Carlier, Albane Degrassat-Théas, Anne-Aurélie Epis de Fleurian, Anne Grumblat, Aurélie Lavorel, Mégane Lesaignoux, Tess Martin, Adrien Michaud, Jonathan Morizot, Nathalie Préaubert, Valery-Pierre Riche, Isabelle Durand Zaleski
{"title":"基于活动的支付系统(T2A)的改革如何有助于创新卫生产品的融资?","authors":"Xavier Armoiry, Nejma Saidani, Martine Aoustin, Dorothée Camus, Auriane Cano-Chancel, Sophie Carlier, Albane Degrassat-Théas, Anne-Aurélie Epis de Fleurian, Anne Grumblat, Aurélie Lavorel, Mégane Lesaignoux, Tess Martin, Adrien Michaud, Jonathan Morizot, Nathalie Préaubert, Valery-Pierre Riche, Isabelle Durand Zaleski","doi":"10.1016/j.therap.2024.10.063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In France, the short-stay activities of public and private sector healthcare facilities have been financed since 2004 by activity-based pricing (T2A). The principle is to allow for payment determined primarily by the nature and volume of activities. T2A has enabled a major transformation compared to the old financing system, chiefly for public sector facilities that used to operate under a general allocation, and convergence between payment methods in the public and private sectors. However, official reports and public pronouncements by many hospital healthcare stakeholders have also highlighted the limits of this method of financing, leading to several reform projects. With that in mind, round table 3 of the Giens Workshops, including experts from academia and/or hospitals, institutions, and industry, questioned the impact of the new T2A reforms on access to innovative health care products in hospitals. After scoping out the issue and drawing up observations, the round table proposed six general recommendations that would be avenues for improving access to innovative health care products for hospital service users.</p>","PeriodicalId":23147,"journal":{"name":"Therapie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How can the reform of the activity-based payment system (T2A) help in financing innovative health products?\",\"authors\":\"Xavier Armoiry, Nejma Saidani, Martine Aoustin, Dorothée Camus, Auriane Cano-Chancel, Sophie Carlier, Albane Degrassat-Théas, Anne-Aurélie Epis de Fleurian, Anne Grumblat, Aurélie Lavorel, Mégane Lesaignoux, Tess Martin, Adrien Michaud, Jonathan Morizot, Nathalie Préaubert, Valery-Pierre Riche, Isabelle Durand Zaleski\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.therap.2024.10.063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In France, the short-stay activities of public and private sector healthcare facilities have been financed since 2004 by activity-based pricing (T2A). The principle is to allow for payment determined primarily by the nature and volume of activities. T2A has enabled a major transformation compared to the old financing system, chiefly for public sector facilities that used to operate under a general allocation, and convergence between payment methods in the public and private sectors. However, official reports and public pronouncements by many hospital healthcare stakeholders have also highlighted the limits of this method of financing, leading to several reform projects. With that in mind, round table 3 of the Giens Workshops, including experts from academia and/or hospitals, institutions, and industry, questioned the impact of the new T2A reforms on access to innovative health care products in hospitals. After scoping out the issue and drawing up observations, the round table proposed six general recommendations that would be avenues for improving access to innovative health care products for hospital service users.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23147,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.therap.2024.10.063\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.therap.2024.10.063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在法国,自2004年以来,公共和私营部门保健设施的短期住院活动一直采用基于活动的定价方式(T2A)。其原则是允许主要由活动的性质和数量决定的付款。与旧的融资体系相比,T2A实现了重大转变,主要是针对过去在一般拨款下运作的公共部门设施,以及公共和私营部门支付方式的融合。然而,许多医院医疗保健利益相关者的官方报告和公开声明也强调了这种融资方式的局限性,导致了几个改革项目。考虑到这一点,包括来自学术界和(或)医院、机构和产业界的专家在内的Giens讲习班圆桌会议3对T2A新改革对医院获得创新医疗保健产品的影响提出了质疑。在确定问题范围并提出意见之后,圆桌会议提出了六项一般性建议,这些建议将成为改善医院服务使用者获得创新保健产品的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How can the reform of the activity-based payment system (T2A) help in financing innovative health products?

In France, the short-stay activities of public and private sector healthcare facilities have been financed since 2004 by activity-based pricing (T2A). The principle is to allow for payment determined primarily by the nature and volume of activities. T2A has enabled a major transformation compared to the old financing system, chiefly for public sector facilities that used to operate under a general allocation, and convergence between payment methods in the public and private sectors. However, official reports and public pronouncements by many hospital healthcare stakeholders have also highlighted the limits of this method of financing, leading to several reform projects. With that in mind, round table 3 of the Giens Workshops, including experts from academia and/or hospitals, institutions, and industry, questioned the impact of the new T2A reforms on access to innovative health care products in hospitals. After scoping out the issue and drawing up observations, the round table proposed six general recommendations that would be avenues for improving access to innovative health care products for hospital service users.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapie
Therapie 医学-药学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
132
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Thérapie is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to Clinical Pharmacology, Therapeutics, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacovigilance, Addictovigilance, Social Pharmacology, Pharmacoepidemiology, Pharmacoeconomics and Evidence-Based-Medicine. Thérapie publishes in French or in English original articles, general reviews, letters to the editor reporting original findings, correspondence relating to articles or letters published in the Journal, short articles, editorials on up-to-date topics, Pharmacovigilance or Addictovigilance reports that follow the French "guidelines" concerning good practice in pharmacovigilance publications. The journal also publishes thematic issues on topical subject. The journal is indexed in the main international data bases and notably in: Biosis Previews/Biological Abstracts, Embase/Excerpta Medica, Medline/Index Medicus, Science Citation Index.
期刊最新文献
Addictovigilance: The Edge of reason? Adagrasib-induced photodistributed hyperpigmentation: Two case reports and pathogenetic hypothesis. COVID-19 infection and risk of adverse drug reactions: Cohort study. BRAF and MEK inhibitors rechallenge after an adverse drug reaction in patients with cancer: A pharmacovigilance cohort study. [Impact of dronabinol shortage on a population of chronic pain patients: A retrospective observational study].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1