egfr突变型非小细胞肺癌患者EGFR-ctDNA脱落的临床特征

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Translational Oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-21 DOI:10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102228
Martina Ruglioni, Iacopo Petrini, Stefania Crucitta, Andrea Sbrana, Giovanna Irene Luculli, Leila Sadeghi Gol, Carola Forte, Antonio Chella, Christian Rolfo, Romano Danesi, Marzia Del Re
{"title":"egfr突变型非小细胞肺癌患者EGFR-ctDNA脱落的临床特征","authors":"Martina Ruglioni, Iacopo Petrini, Stefania Crucitta, Andrea Sbrana, Giovanna Irene Luculli, Leila Sadeghi Gol, Carola Forte, Antonio Chella, Christian Rolfo, Romano Danesi, Marzia Del Re","doi":"10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) revolutionized the molecular diagnostics of lung cancer by enabling non-invasive, sensitive identification of actionable mutations. However, ctDNA analysis may be challenging due to tumor shedding variability, leading to false negative results. This study aims to understand the determinants for ctDNA shedding based on clinical characteristics of lung cancer patients, for a better interpretation of false negative results to be considered when ordering ctDNA analysis for clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Blood samples were collected from patients with stage IV EGFR-mutated (mEGFR) NSCLC before treatment and monitored until disease progression. EGFR was assessed on tissue by standard procedures, while EGFR status on ctDNA was tested using dPCR at baseline and at the first reassessment. NGS was used to evaluate patients mutational status at the progression of the disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 40 mEGFR tissue samples were collected. Plasma samples were analyzed for mEGFR before starting the first line, 65 % of patients had detectable mEGFR in ctDNA (\"shedders\"). Higher ECOG PS (p = 0.04), bilateral localization of primary tumor (p = 0.04), and the presence of intrathoracic/extrathoracic disease (p = 0.05), were associated to mEGFR shedding. Shedders had shorter PFS compared to non-shedders (p = 0.03). Patients with detectable mEGFR in ctDNA at the first radiological assessment exhibited worse PFS compared to patients with ctDNA clearance (p = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our preliminary data demonstrate that specific clinical characteristics predict mEGFR shedding in ctDNA of NSCLC, suggesting a potential clinical applicability for understanding potential false negative results and appropriate reporting in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":23244,"journal":{"name":"Translational Oncology","volume":"52 ","pages":"102228"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical characteristics of EGFR-ctDNA shedders in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients.\",\"authors\":\"Martina Ruglioni, Iacopo Petrini, Stefania Crucitta, Andrea Sbrana, Giovanna Irene Luculli, Leila Sadeghi Gol, Carola Forte, Antonio Chella, Christian Rolfo, Romano Danesi, Marzia Del Re\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) revolutionized the molecular diagnostics of lung cancer by enabling non-invasive, sensitive identification of actionable mutations. However, ctDNA analysis may be challenging due to tumor shedding variability, leading to false negative results. This study aims to understand the determinants for ctDNA shedding based on clinical characteristics of lung cancer patients, for a better interpretation of false negative results to be considered when ordering ctDNA analysis for clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Blood samples were collected from patients with stage IV EGFR-mutated (mEGFR) NSCLC before treatment and monitored until disease progression. EGFR was assessed on tissue by standard procedures, while EGFR status on ctDNA was tested using dPCR at baseline and at the first reassessment. NGS was used to evaluate patients mutational status at the progression of the disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 40 mEGFR tissue samples were collected. Plasma samples were analyzed for mEGFR before starting the first line, 65 % of patients had detectable mEGFR in ctDNA (\\\"shedders\\\"). Higher ECOG PS (p = 0.04), bilateral localization of primary tumor (p = 0.04), and the presence of intrathoracic/extrathoracic disease (p = 0.05), were associated to mEGFR shedding. Shedders had shorter PFS compared to non-shedders (p = 0.03). Patients with detectable mEGFR in ctDNA at the first radiological assessment exhibited worse PFS compared to patients with ctDNA clearance (p = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our preliminary data demonstrate that specific clinical characteristics predict mEGFR shedding in ctDNA of NSCLC, suggesting a potential clinical applicability for understanding potential false negative results and appropriate reporting in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Oncology\",\"volume\":\"52 \",\"pages\":\"102228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102228\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102228","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA)通过无创、灵敏地识别可操作的突变,彻底改变了肺癌的分子诊断。然而,由于肿瘤脱落的可变性,ctDNA分析可能具有挑战性,导致假阴性结果。本研究旨在根据肺癌患者的临床特征了解ctDNA脱落的决定因素,以便在临床实践中进行ctDNA分析时更好地解释假阴性结果。方法:在治疗前采集IV期egfr突变(mEGFR) NSCLC患者的血液样本并监测直至疾病进展。通过标准程序评估组织中的EGFR,而在基线和第一次重新评估时使用dPCR检测ctDNA上的EGFR状态。NGS用于评估患者在疾病进展中的突变状态。结果:共收集到mEGFR组织样本40份。在开始一线治疗前,对血浆样本进行mEGFR分析,65%的患者在ctDNA中检测到mEGFR(“脱落者”)。较高的ECOG PS (p = 0.04)、原发肿瘤的双侧定位(p = 0.04)和胸内/胸外疾病的存在(p = 0.05)与mEGFR脱落有关。与非脱模者相比,脱模者的PFS较短(p = 0.03)。与ctDNA清除的患者相比,首次放射评估时ctDNA中可检测到mEGFR的患者表现出更差的PFS (p = 0.05)。结论:我们的初步数据表明,特定的临床特征可以预测NSCLC ctDNA中mEGFR的脱落,这对于了解潜在的假阴性结果和在临床实践中适当报告具有潜在的临床适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical characteristics of EGFR-ctDNA shedders in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients.

Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) revolutionized the molecular diagnostics of lung cancer by enabling non-invasive, sensitive identification of actionable mutations. However, ctDNA analysis may be challenging due to tumor shedding variability, leading to false negative results. This study aims to understand the determinants for ctDNA shedding based on clinical characteristics of lung cancer patients, for a better interpretation of false negative results to be considered when ordering ctDNA analysis for clinical practice.

Methods: Blood samples were collected from patients with stage IV EGFR-mutated (mEGFR) NSCLC before treatment and monitored until disease progression. EGFR was assessed on tissue by standard procedures, while EGFR status on ctDNA was tested using dPCR at baseline and at the first reassessment. NGS was used to evaluate patients mutational status at the progression of the disease.

Results: A total of 40 mEGFR tissue samples were collected. Plasma samples were analyzed for mEGFR before starting the first line, 65 % of patients had detectable mEGFR in ctDNA ("shedders"). Higher ECOG PS (p = 0.04), bilateral localization of primary tumor (p = 0.04), and the presence of intrathoracic/extrathoracic disease (p = 0.05), were associated to mEGFR shedding. Shedders had shorter PFS compared to non-shedders (p = 0.03). Patients with detectable mEGFR in ctDNA at the first radiological assessment exhibited worse PFS compared to patients with ctDNA clearance (p = 0.05).

Conclusion: Our preliminary data demonstrate that specific clinical characteristics predict mEGFR shedding in ctDNA of NSCLC, suggesting a potential clinical applicability for understanding potential false negative results and appropriate reporting in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Oncology
Translational Oncology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cancer Research
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.00%
发文量
314
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Oncology publishes the results of novel research investigations which bridge the laboratory and clinical settings including risk assessment, cellular and molecular characterization, prevention, detection, diagnosis and treatment of human cancers with the overall goal of improving the clinical care of oncology patients. Translational Oncology will publish laboratory studies of novel therapeutic interventions as well as clinical trials which evaluate new treatment paradigms for cancer. Peer reviewed manuscript types include Original Reports, Reviews and Editorials.
期刊最新文献
Autophagy activation in response to cigarette smoke: Exploring the disparity in laryngeal cancer incidence and outcomes between sexes in South Korea. Exogenous dihomo-γ-linolenic acid triggers ferroptosis via ACSL4-mediated lipid metabolic reprogramming in acute myeloid leukemia cells. MAGI2-AS3 hypermethylated in promoter region promotes migration and invasion of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma via miRNA-31-5p/AR axis. Development and validation of a prognostic and drug sensitivity model for gastric cancer utilizing telomere-related genes. Modified CD15/CD16-CLL1 inhibitory CAR-T cells for mitigating granulocytopenia toxicities in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1