筛查,治疗和转诊药物使用障碍在医疗补助家庭:一项国家试点研究的结果。

Olivia M Hinds, Melissa A Westlake, Sophia N D Negaro, Christina M Andrews
{"title":"筛查,治疗和转诊药物使用障碍在医疗补助家庭:一项国家试点研究的结果。","authors":"Olivia M Hinds, Melissa A Westlake, Sophia N D Negaro, Christina M Andrews","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2024.209608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Established under the Affordable Care Act, Medicaid health homes are designed to provide comprehensive health care for enrollees with chronic health conditions. Given high rates of substance use disorder (SUD) in Medicaid, health homes have the potential to enhance SUD identification and treatment. Yet little is known about the extent to which they engage in these activities. In this study, we assessed the proportion of health homes that screen, treat, and refer for SUD; health homes compliance with state plan requirements for SUD screening and treatment; and the extent to which these trends differ among health homes focusing on physical versus mental health and SUD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We administered a pilot survey in 2022 to all health care providers participating in active Medicaid health home models. Health home models were categorized as physical-, mental health-, or SUD-focused. We estimated the percentage of health homes engaged in SUD screening, treatment, and referral, and the percentage of health homes that complied with state requirements in each domain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our sample included 113 Medicaid health homes in 15 states and the District of Columbia. Physical health-focused health homes were more likely to screen for SUD than mental health-focused and SUD-focused health homes (81.0 % versus 63.4 % and 55.0 % respectively). Most health homes referred out at least some SUD treatment (84.1 %). Among those that did refer, fewer than 20 % had a formal contractual agreement with an SUD treatment program. The majority of health homes complied with state requirements for referral. However, among health homes required by their state to offer SUD screening, 38.5 % of physical health-, 10.0 % of mental health-, and 25.0 % of SUD-focused health homes failed to do so. Similarly, 5.9 % of physical health-, 67.9 % of mental health- and 45.0 % of SUD-focused health homes did not offer onsite SUD treatment, even when required to do so.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While Medicaid health home plans were established to promote care coordination and integration, relatively few health homes in this study reported doing so in the case of SUD. A concerning number of health homes did not comply with state plan requirements for SUD screening and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":" ","pages":"209608"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening, treatment, and referral for substance use disorder in Medicaid health homes: Results of a national pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Olivia M Hinds, Melissa A Westlake, Sophia N D Negaro, Christina M Andrews\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.josat.2024.209608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Established under the Affordable Care Act, Medicaid health homes are designed to provide comprehensive health care for enrollees with chronic health conditions. Given high rates of substance use disorder (SUD) in Medicaid, health homes have the potential to enhance SUD identification and treatment. Yet little is known about the extent to which they engage in these activities. In this study, we assessed the proportion of health homes that screen, treat, and refer for SUD; health homes compliance with state plan requirements for SUD screening and treatment; and the extent to which these trends differ among health homes focusing on physical versus mental health and SUD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We administered a pilot survey in 2022 to all health care providers participating in active Medicaid health home models. Health home models were categorized as physical-, mental health-, or SUD-focused. We estimated the percentage of health homes engaged in SUD screening, treatment, and referral, and the percentage of health homes that complied with state requirements in each domain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our sample included 113 Medicaid health homes in 15 states and the District of Columbia. Physical health-focused health homes were more likely to screen for SUD than mental health-focused and SUD-focused health homes (81.0 % versus 63.4 % and 55.0 % respectively). Most health homes referred out at least some SUD treatment (84.1 %). Among those that did refer, fewer than 20 % had a formal contractual agreement with an SUD treatment program. The majority of health homes complied with state requirements for referral. However, among health homes required by their state to offer SUD screening, 38.5 % of physical health-, 10.0 % of mental health-, and 25.0 % of SUD-focused health homes failed to do so. Similarly, 5.9 % of physical health-, 67.9 % of mental health- and 45.0 % of SUD-focused health homes did not offer onsite SUD treatment, even when required to do so.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While Medicaid health home plans were established to promote care coordination and integration, relatively few health homes in this study reported doing so in the case of SUD. A concerning number of health homes did not comply with state plan requirements for SUD screening and treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"209608\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.josat.2024.209608\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.josat.2024.209608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:根据《平价医疗法案》建立的医疗补助计划健康之家旨在为患有慢性疾病的参保者提供全面的医疗保健。鉴于医疗补助中物质使用障碍(SUD)的高比例,健康之家有可能加强SUD的识别和治疗。然而,人们对他们参与这些活动的程度知之甚少。在本研究中,我们评估了筛查、治疗和转诊SUD的健康之家的比例;健康之家是否符合国家计划对SUD筛查和治疗的要求;以及这些趋势在关注身体健康、心理健康和SUD的健康之家之间的差异程度。方法:我们在2022年对所有参与积极医疗补助健康之家模式的医疗服务提供者进行了一项试点调查。健康家庭模型被分为以身体健康、精神健康或sud为重点。我们估计了从事SUD筛查、治疗和转诊的健康之家的百分比,以及在每个领域符合州要求的健康之家的百分比。结果:我们的样本包括15个州和哥伦比亚特区的113个医疗补助家庭。以身体健康为重点的健康之家比以精神健康和以SUD为重点的健康之家更有可能筛查SUD(分别为81.0 %对63.4 %和55.0 %)。大多数卫生院至少提到了一些SUD治疗(84.1% %)。在那些确实转诊的患者中,只有不到20% %的患者与SUD治疗方案签订了正式的合同协议。大多数保健之家都符合国家转诊的要求。然而,在各州要求提供SUD筛查的健康之家中,38.5% %的身体健康-,10.0% %的精神健康-和25.0% %的专注于SUD的健康之家没有这样做。同样,5.9% %的身体健康、67.9% %的精神健康和45.0% %的专注于SUD的健康之家没有提供现场SUD治疗,即使被要求这样做。结论:虽然医疗补助家庭计划的建立是为了促进护理协调和整合,但在本研究中,相对较少的健康家庭报告在SUD的情况下这样做。相当数量的健康之家没有遵守国家计划对SUD筛查和治疗的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Screening, treatment, and referral for substance use disorder in Medicaid health homes: Results of a national pilot study.

Introduction: Established under the Affordable Care Act, Medicaid health homes are designed to provide comprehensive health care for enrollees with chronic health conditions. Given high rates of substance use disorder (SUD) in Medicaid, health homes have the potential to enhance SUD identification and treatment. Yet little is known about the extent to which they engage in these activities. In this study, we assessed the proportion of health homes that screen, treat, and refer for SUD; health homes compliance with state plan requirements for SUD screening and treatment; and the extent to which these trends differ among health homes focusing on physical versus mental health and SUD.

Methods: We administered a pilot survey in 2022 to all health care providers participating in active Medicaid health home models. Health home models were categorized as physical-, mental health-, or SUD-focused. We estimated the percentage of health homes engaged in SUD screening, treatment, and referral, and the percentage of health homes that complied with state requirements in each domain.

Results: Our sample included 113 Medicaid health homes in 15 states and the District of Columbia. Physical health-focused health homes were more likely to screen for SUD than mental health-focused and SUD-focused health homes (81.0 % versus 63.4 % and 55.0 % respectively). Most health homes referred out at least some SUD treatment (84.1 %). Among those that did refer, fewer than 20 % had a formal contractual agreement with an SUD treatment program. The majority of health homes complied with state requirements for referral. However, among health homes required by their state to offer SUD screening, 38.5 % of physical health-, 10.0 % of mental health-, and 25.0 % of SUD-focused health homes failed to do so. Similarly, 5.9 % of physical health-, 67.9 % of mental health- and 45.0 % of SUD-focused health homes did not offer onsite SUD treatment, even when required to do so.

Conclusions: While Medicaid health home plans were established to promote care coordination and integration, relatively few health homes in this study reported doing so in the case of SUD. A concerning number of health homes did not comply with state plan requirements for SUD screening and treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A qualitative study exploring the feasibility and acceptability of embedding an overdose prevention sites in a U.S. hospital. The first five years of implementing Missouri's medication first approach to opioid use disorder treatment: Plateaus, regressions, and underbellies of progress. Implementation science in higher education: Identifying key determinants in the selection of evidence-based alcohol and substance prevention and treatment. Classes of outpatient quality of care among individuals with substance-related disorders, based on a survey and health insurance registry. Description of implementing a mail-based overdose education and naloxone distribution program in community supervision settings during COVID-19.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1