结直肠癌患者联合或不联合化疗的靶向治疗和/或免疫治疗的疗效:一项网络荟萃分析

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY European journal of pharmacology Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1016/j.ejphar.2024.177219
Haoyan Guo , Longjie Miao , Chengdong Yu
{"title":"结直肠癌患者联合或不联合化疗的靶向治疗和/或免疫治疗的疗效:一项网络荟萃分析","authors":"Haoyan Guo ,&nbsp;Longjie Miao ,&nbsp;Chengdong Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.ejphar.2024.177219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The use of targeted drugs and immunotherapy has significantly impacted the treatment of Colorectal Cancer. However, horizontal comparison among various regimens is extremely rare. Therefore, we evaluated the survival efficacy of multiple treatment regimens of targeted therapy and/or immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy in patients with Colorectal Cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases, covering the period from the establishment of the databases to October 29, 2024. To obtain articles that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and contained the required data for conducting a network meta-analysis (NMA). The NMA evaluated overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 90 studies were identified, comprising a sample size of 33,167 subjects. In terms of PFS, compared with simple chemotherapy strategies, most of the other single or combined strategies are significantly effective, among which targeted therapy strategies have more advantages. Encorafenib + Binimetinib + Cetuximab (ENC-BIN-CET) shows significant benefits in all comparisons except when compared with Chemotherapy + Cetuximab + Dalotuzumab (Chemo-CET-DAL), Encorafenib + Cetuximab (ENC-CET), and Panitumumab + Sotorasib (PAN-SOT). The ENC-CET and PAN-SOT targeted strategies also show significant benefits. Pembrolizumab (PEM) monotherapy has advantages over all others except when it is not superior to some targeted strategies. Chemotherapy + Bevacizumab + Atezolizumab is only inferior to some strategies. In terms of OS, the combinations of Chemotherapy + Bevacizumab, ENC-CET, Chemotherapy + Panitumumab, and ENC-BIN-CET are superior to simple chemotherapy regimens. ENC-BIN-CET shows OS benefits in all comparisons except some. ENC-CET significantly improves OS in most cases, and PEM also significantly improves OS in some regimens. In the probability ranking of OS and PFS, ENC-BIN-CET has the best effect, followed by ENC-CET.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In conclusion, pembrolizumab is still effective in prolonging survival. Dual- and triple-drug targeted strategies are the best in terms of OS and PFS, and the combination of targeted immunotherapy and chemotherapy also works. However, not all combinations are beneficial. As targeted drugs play an active role, specific drugs for colorectal cancer regimens should be carefully selected.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12004,"journal":{"name":"European journal of pharmacology","volume":"988 ","pages":"Article 177219"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy of targeted therapy and/or immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer: A network meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Haoyan Guo ,&nbsp;Longjie Miao ,&nbsp;Chengdong Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejphar.2024.177219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The use of targeted drugs and immunotherapy has significantly impacted the treatment of Colorectal Cancer. However, horizontal comparison among various regimens is extremely rare. Therefore, we evaluated the survival efficacy of multiple treatment regimens of targeted therapy and/or immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy in patients with Colorectal Cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases, covering the period from the establishment of the databases to October 29, 2024. To obtain articles that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and contained the required data for conducting a network meta-analysis (NMA). The NMA evaluated overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 90 studies were identified, comprising a sample size of 33,167 subjects. In terms of PFS, compared with simple chemotherapy strategies, most of the other single or combined strategies are significantly effective, among which targeted therapy strategies have more advantages. Encorafenib + Binimetinib + Cetuximab (ENC-BIN-CET) shows significant benefits in all comparisons except when compared with Chemotherapy + Cetuximab + Dalotuzumab (Chemo-CET-DAL), Encorafenib + Cetuximab (ENC-CET), and Panitumumab + Sotorasib (PAN-SOT). The ENC-CET and PAN-SOT targeted strategies also show significant benefits. Pembrolizumab (PEM) monotherapy has advantages over all others except when it is not superior to some targeted strategies. Chemotherapy + Bevacizumab + Atezolizumab is only inferior to some strategies. In terms of OS, the combinations of Chemotherapy + Bevacizumab, ENC-CET, Chemotherapy + Panitumumab, and ENC-BIN-CET are superior to simple chemotherapy regimens. ENC-BIN-CET shows OS benefits in all comparisons except some. ENC-CET significantly improves OS in most cases, and PEM also significantly improves OS in some regimens. In the probability ranking of OS and PFS, ENC-BIN-CET has the best effect, followed by ENC-CET.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In conclusion, pembrolizumab is still effective in prolonging survival. Dual- and triple-drug targeted strategies are the best in terms of OS and PFS, and the combination of targeted immunotherapy and chemotherapy also works. However, not all combinations are beneficial. As targeted drugs play an active role, specific drugs for colorectal cancer regimens should be carefully selected.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"988 \",\"pages\":\"Article 177219\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014299924009099\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014299924009099","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:靶向药物和免疫治疗的使用对结直肠癌的治疗有显著影响。然而,各种方案之间的横向比较是极其罕见的。因此,我们评估了多种治疗方案的靶向治疗和/或免疫治疗联合化疗或不联合化疗对结直肠癌患者的生存疗效。方法:系统检索PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库,检索时间为数据库建立至2024年10月29日。获得符合纳入和排除标准并包含进行网络meta分析(NMA)所需数据的文章。NMA评估总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。结果:共确定了90项研究,包括33,167名受试者的样本量。在PFS方面,与单纯化疗策略相比,其他多数单一或联合化疗策略均显著有效,其中靶向治疗策略更具优势。除了与化疗+西妥昔单抗+Dalotuzumab (Chemo-CET-DAL)、恩科非尼+西妥昔单抗(encc - cet)和帕尼单抗+Sotorasib (PAN-SOT)相比,恩科非尼+Binimetinib+西妥昔单抗(encc - cet)在所有比较中都显示出显著的益处。针对cet - cet和PAN-SOT的策略也显示出显著的优势。Pembrolizumab (PEM)单药治疗除了不优于某些靶向策略外,具有优于所有其他治疗的优势。化疗+贝伐单抗+阿特唑单抗仅低于某些策略。在OS方面,化疗+贝伐单抗、c - cet、化疗+帕尼单抗、c - bin - cet联合治疗优于单纯化疗方案。c - bin - cet在所有比较中都显示了操作系统的优势,除了一些。c - cet在大多数情况下显著改善OS, PEM在某些方案中也显著改善OS。在OS和PFS的概率排序中,c - bin - cet效果最好,其次是c - cet。结论:总之,派姆单抗在延长生存期方面仍然有效。在OS和PFS方面,双药和三联药靶向策略是最好的,靶向免疫治疗和化疗联合也有效。然而,并非所有的组合都是有益的。由于靶向药物起着积极的作用,针对结直肠癌治疗方案的特异性药物应慎重选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The efficacy of targeted therapy and/or immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer: A network meta-analysis

Background

The use of targeted drugs and immunotherapy has significantly impacted the treatment of Colorectal Cancer. However, horizontal comparison among various regimens is extremely rare. Therefore, we evaluated the survival efficacy of multiple treatment regimens of targeted therapy and/or immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy in patients with Colorectal Cancer.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases, covering the period from the establishment of the databases to October 29, 2024. To obtain articles that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and contained the required data for conducting a network meta-analysis (NMA). The NMA evaluated overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

A total of 90 studies were identified, comprising a sample size of 33,167 subjects. In terms of PFS, compared with simple chemotherapy strategies, most of the other single or combined strategies are significantly effective, among which targeted therapy strategies have more advantages. Encorafenib + Binimetinib + Cetuximab (ENC-BIN-CET) shows significant benefits in all comparisons except when compared with Chemotherapy + Cetuximab + Dalotuzumab (Chemo-CET-DAL), Encorafenib + Cetuximab (ENC-CET), and Panitumumab + Sotorasib (PAN-SOT). The ENC-CET and PAN-SOT targeted strategies also show significant benefits. Pembrolizumab (PEM) monotherapy has advantages over all others except when it is not superior to some targeted strategies. Chemotherapy + Bevacizumab + Atezolizumab is only inferior to some strategies. In terms of OS, the combinations of Chemotherapy + Bevacizumab, ENC-CET, Chemotherapy + Panitumumab, and ENC-BIN-CET are superior to simple chemotherapy regimens. ENC-BIN-CET shows OS benefits in all comparisons except some. ENC-CET significantly improves OS in most cases, and PEM also significantly improves OS in some regimens. In the probability ranking of OS and PFS, ENC-BIN-CET has the best effect, followed by ENC-CET.

Conclusions

In conclusion, pembrolizumab is still effective in prolonging survival. Dual- and triple-drug targeted strategies are the best in terms of OS and PFS, and the combination of targeted immunotherapy and chemotherapy also works. However, not all combinations are beneficial. As targeted drugs play an active role, specific drugs for colorectal cancer regimens should be carefully selected.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
572
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Pharmacology publishes research papers covering all aspects of experimental pharmacology with focus on the mechanism of action of structurally identified compounds affecting biological systems. The scope includes: Behavioural pharmacology Neuropharmacology and analgesia Cardiovascular pharmacology Pulmonary, gastrointestinal and urogenital pharmacology Endocrine pharmacology Immunopharmacology and inflammation Molecular and cellular pharmacology Regenerative pharmacology Biologicals and biotherapeutics Translational pharmacology Nutriceutical pharmacology.
期刊最新文献
Disulfiram alleviates immune-mediated liver injury by inhibiting pyroptosis in hepatocytes through the NF-κB pathway Hydrogen-rich water ameliorates imiquimod-induced psoriasis-like skin lesions and regulates macrophage polarization in dyslipidemic ApoE-deficient mice. Agmatine Mitigates Hyperexcitability of Ventral Tegmental Area Dopaminergic Neurons in Prenatally Stressed Male Offspring. Hepatokines and Their Role in Cardiohepatic Interactions in Heart Failure. The Potential Role of PD-1/PD-L1 Small Molecule Inhibitors in Colorectal Cancer with Different Mechanisms of Action.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1