受感染乳房假体的术中挽救预测因素:一项回顾性研究

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Aesthetic Surgery Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1093/asj/sjae242
Makenna Ash, Owen Brown, Jennifer Wang, Omar Jean-Baptiste, Angela Cheng, Grant Carlson, Albert Losken, Peter Thompson
{"title":"受感染乳房假体的术中挽救预测因素:一项回顾性研究","authors":"Makenna Ash, Owen Brown, Jennifer Wang, Omar Jean-Baptiste, Angela Cheng, Grant Carlson, Albert Losken, Peter Thompson","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjae242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infectious complications associated with implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) can be devastating and may lead to reconstructive failure. While there are known demographic risk factors for reconstructive failure, few studies have identified intraoperative findings that predict failure after attempted salvage.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to identify intraoperative findings in infected breasts that may be predictive of implant failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>837 patients undergoing IBBR between January 2017 and July 2023 were included. Intraoperative records of patients who developed a major infection were reviewed. Reconstructive salvage denoted any intervention not resulting in explantation. Failure denoted implant explantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 837 patients, 8% developed a major infection (n=71). Within this group, 8% had successful treatment with IV antibiotics alone, 38% were salvaged after operative intervention, 28.2% failed without salvage attempt, and 25.4% underwent salvage attempt but ultimately failed. Overall, the rate of reconstructive failure was 53.5% and the rate of implant salvage was 46.5%. 51% of patients returning to OR were found to have unincorporated acellular dermal matrix (ADM). 78% of patients undergoing intervention had positive culture, most commonly MSSA, MRSA, Serratia, Enterobacter, or Proteus. Unincorporated ADM was significantly associated with reconstructive failure (Odds Ratio 5.4, p=0.02). Serratia infection, hematoma, and gram-negative infection were associated with implant failure, but these finding did not achieve statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Presence of unincorporated ADM was associated with eventual implant failure. Surgeons should be aware that this finding may portend poor outcomes for patients. These results may be useful in informing intraoperative decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative Predictors of Salvage in Infected Breast Implants: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Makenna Ash, Owen Brown, Jennifer Wang, Omar Jean-Baptiste, Angela Cheng, Grant Carlson, Albert Losken, Peter Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/asj/sjae242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infectious complications associated with implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) can be devastating and may lead to reconstructive failure. While there are known demographic risk factors for reconstructive failure, few studies have identified intraoperative findings that predict failure after attempted salvage.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to identify intraoperative findings in infected breasts that may be predictive of implant failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>837 patients undergoing IBBR between January 2017 and July 2023 were included. Intraoperative records of patients who developed a major infection were reviewed. Reconstructive salvage denoted any intervention not resulting in explantation. Failure denoted implant explantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 837 patients, 8% developed a major infection (n=71). Within this group, 8% had successful treatment with IV antibiotics alone, 38% were salvaged after operative intervention, 28.2% failed without salvage attempt, and 25.4% underwent salvage attempt but ultimately failed. Overall, the rate of reconstructive failure was 53.5% and the rate of implant salvage was 46.5%. 51% of patients returning to OR were found to have unincorporated acellular dermal matrix (ADM). 78% of patients undergoing intervention had positive culture, most commonly MSSA, MRSA, Serratia, Enterobacter, or Proteus. Unincorporated ADM was significantly associated with reconstructive failure (Odds Ratio 5.4, p=0.02). Serratia infection, hematoma, and gram-negative infection were associated with implant failure, but these finding did not achieve statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Presence of unincorporated ADM was associated with eventual implant failure. Surgeons should be aware that this finding may portend poor outcomes for patients. These results may be useful in informing intraoperative decision making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic Surgery Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic Surgery Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjae242\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjae242","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:植入式乳房再造术(IBBR)相关的感染性并发症可能是毁灭性的,并可能导致再造术失败。虽然有已知的重建失败的人口危险因素,但很少有研究确定术中发现预测尝试抢救后失败。目的:本研究的目的是确定感染乳房的术中发现可能预测植入物失败。方法:纳入2017年1月至2023年7月期间接受IBBR的837例患者。回顾了发生重大感染的患者术中记录。重建挽救指的是任何不导致外植的干预。失败表示植入物外植。结果:837例患者中,8%发生严重感染(n=71)。该组仅静脉注射抗生素治疗成功的占8%,手术干预后抢救成功的占38%,未抢救失败的占28.2%,抢救失败的占25.4%。总体而言,重建失败率为53.5%,种植体保留率为46.5%。51%返回手术室的患者被发现有未合并的脱细胞真皮基质(ADM)。78%接受干预的患者培养阳性,最常见的是MSSA、MRSA、沙雷氏菌、肠杆菌或变形杆菌。未合并ADM与重建失败显著相关(优势比5.4,p=0.02)。沙雷菌感染、血肿和革兰氏阴性感染与种植体失败相关,但这些发现没有统计学意义。结论:未掺入的ADM的存在与最终的种植失败有关。外科医生应该意识到这一发现可能预示着患者预后不佳。这些结果可能有助于术中决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intraoperative Predictors of Salvage in Infected Breast Implants: A Retrospective Study.

Background: Infectious complications associated with implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) can be devastating and may lead to reconstructive failure. While there are known demographic risk factors for reconstructive failure, few studies have identified intraoperative findings that predict failure after attempted salvage.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to identify intraoperative findings in infected breasts that may be predictive of implant failure.

Methods: 837 patients undergoing IBBR between January 2017 and July 2023 were included. Intraoperative records of patients who developed a major infection were reviewed. Reconstructive salvage denoted any intervention not resulting in explantation. Failure denoted implant explantation.

Results: Of 837 patients, 8% developed a major infection (n=71). Within this group, 8% had successful treatment with IV antibiotics alone, 38% were salvaged after operative intervention, 28.2% failed without salvage attempt, and 25.4% underwent salvage attempt but ultimately failed. Overall, the rate of reconstructive failure was 53.5% and the rate of implant salvage was 46.5%. 51% of patients returning to OR were found to have unincorporated acellular dermal matrix (ADM). 78% of patients undergoing intervention had positive culture, most commonly MSSA, MRSA, Serratia, Enterobacter, or Proteus. Unincorporated ADM was significantly associated with reconstructive failure (Odds Ratio 5.4, p=0.02). Serratia infection, hematoma, and gram-negative infection were associated with implant failure, but these finding did not achieve statistical significance.

Conclusions: Presence of unincorporated ADM was associated with eventual implant failure. Surgeons should be aware that this finding may portend poor outcomes for patients. These results may be useful in informing intraoperative decision making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
期刊最新文献
Arterioembolic Characteristics of Differentially Diluted CaHA-CMC Gels Within an Artificial Macrovascular Perfusion Model. The Occurrence of Health Symptoms in General Practice Before and After the Explantation of Cosmetic Breast Implants. Correction to: Breast Pocket Lavage With Clindamycin Solution for Silicone Removal After Implant Rupture. Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) in 252 Board-Certified Plastic Surgeons: Prevalences, ACE Clustering, and Effects on Adult Health and Behaviors, Including Self-Defined Depression, Work Addiction, and Burnout. IncobotulinumtoxinA in the Treatment of Upper Facial Lines: Results From Two Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1