{"title":"下肢动脉疾病患者在股腘动脉病变处使用药物包覆球囊进行血管内治疗后,膝关节下径流的影响","authors":"Takehiro Yamada, Takahiro Tokuda, Naoki Yoshioka, Akio Koyama, Ryusuke Nishikawa, Kiyotaka Shimamura, Takuya Tsuruoka, Hiroki Mitsuoka, Yusuke Sato, Takuma Aoyama","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The impact of below-the-knee (BK) runoff after drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment in femoropopliteal (FP) lesions has not been well investigated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective multicenter observational study enrolled 291 consecutive patients with lower extremity artery disease who underwent endovascular therapy with DCBs for FP lesions between January 2018 and December 2021. Patients were classified into four groups based on the BK runoff. Outcome measures included primary patency, freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) and amputation, and overall survival rates at 24 months. The predictors of restenosis at 24 months were also investigated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 43, 98, 117, and 33 patients were classified into three, two, one, and no BK runoff groups, respectively. In three, two, one, and no BK runoff groups, the primary patency rates were 72.1%, 67.3%, 61.4%, and 44.1% (<i>p</i> = 0.028); freedom from CD-TLR rates were 87.1%, 78.8%, 71.7%, and 47.1% (<i>p</i> < 0.001); freedom from amputation rates were 95.2%, 97.9%, 92.8%, and 91.5% (<i>p</i> = 0.499); and overall survival rates were 89.4%, 83.2%, 76.6%, and 61.2% (<i>p</i> = 0.007), respectively, at 24 months. Multivariate analysis showed that chronic limb-threatening ischemia, no BK runoff, Lutonix use, and residual stenosis > 30% were independent predictors of primary patency loss at 24 months. The risk score, calculated as the number of predictors, reflected the risk of restenosis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>No BK runoff was associated with worse midterm primary patency, freedom from CD-TLR, and overall survival rates than at least one BK runoff.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":"105 3","pages":"698-706"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Below-the-Knee Runoff in Patients With Lower Extremity Artery Disease Who Underwent Endovascular Therapy Using Drug-Coated Balloons in Femoropopliteal Lesions\",\"authors\":\"Takehiro Yamada, Takahiro Tokuda, Naoki Yoshioka, Akio Koyama, Ryusuke Nishikawa, Kiyotaka Shimamura, Takuya Tsuruoka, Hiroki Mitsuoka, Yusuke Sato, Takuma Aoyama\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ccd.31375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The impact of below-the-knee (BK) runoff after drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment in femoropopliteal (FP) lesions has not been well investigated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This retrospective multicenter observational study enrolled 291 consecutive patients with lower extremity artery disease who underwent endovascular therapy with DCBs for FP lesions between January 2018 and December 2021. Patients were classified into four groups based on the BK runoff. Outcome measures included primary patency, freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) and amputation, and overall survival rates at 24 months. The predictors of restenosis at 24 months were also investigated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In total, 43, 98, 117, and 33 patients were classified into three, two, one, and no BK runoff groups, respectively. In three, two, one, and no BK runoff groups, the primary patency rates were 72.1%, 67.3%, 61.4%, and 44.1% (<i>p</i> = 0.028); freedom from CD-TLR rates were 87.1%, 78.8%, 71.7%, and 47.1% (<i>p</i> < 0.001); freedom from amputation rates were 95.2%, 97.9%, 92.8%, and 91.5% (<i>p</i> = 0.499); and overall survival rates were 89.4%, 83.2%, 76.6%, and 61.2% (<i>p</i> = 0.007), respectively, at 24 months. Multivariate analysis showed that chronic limb-threatening ischemia, no BK runoff, Lutonix use, and residual stenosis > 30% were independent predictors of primary patency loss at 24 months. The risk score, calculated as the number of predictors, reflected the risk of restenosis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>No BK runoff was associated with worse midterm primary patency, freedom from CD-TLR, and overall survival rates than at least one BK runoff.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"volume\":\"105 3\",\"pages\":\"698-706\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.31375\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.31375","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of Below-the-Knee Runoff in Patients With Lower Extremity Artery Disease Who Underwent Endovascular Therapy Using Drug-Coated Balloons in Femoropopliteal Lesions
Background
The impact of below-the-knee (BK) runoff after drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment in femoropopliteal (FP) lesions has not been well investigated.
Methods
This retrospective multicenter observational study enrolled 291 consecutive patients with lower extremity artery disease who underwent endovascular therapy with DCBs for FP lesions between January 2018 and December 2021. Patients were classified into four groups based on the BK runoff. Outcome measures included primary patency, freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) and amputation, and overall survival rates at 24 months. The predictors of restenosis at 24 months were also investigated.
Results
In total, 43, 98, 117, and 33 patients were classified into three, two, one, and no BK runoff groups, respectively. In three, two, one, and no BK runoff groups, the primary patency rates were 72.1%, 67.3%, 61.4%, and 44.1% (p = 0.028); freedom from CD-TLR rates were 87.1%, 78.8%, 71.7%, and 47.1% (p < 0.001); freedom from amputation rates were 95.2%, 97.9%, 92.8%, and 91.5% (p = 0.499); and overall survival rates were 89.4%, 83.2%, 76.6%, and 61.2% (p = 0.007), respectively, at 24 months. Multivariate analysis showed that chronic limb-threatening ischemia, no BK runoff, Lutonix use, and residual stenosis > 30% were independent predictors of primary patency loss at 24 months. The risk score, calculated as the number of predictors, reflected the risk of restenosis.
Conclusion
No BK runoff was associated with worse midterm primary patency, freedom from CD-TLR, and overall survival rates than at least one BK runoff.
期刊介绍:
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.