Li Zhao, Yuanyuan Ren, Donghui Qin, Xue Yang, Zhuo Chen, Na Zhang
{"title":"沙比利/缬沙坦与贝那普利治疗急性心肌梗死后心力衰竭的回顾性分析。","authors":"Li Zhao, Yuanyuan Ren, Donghui Qin, Xue Yang, Zhuo Chen, Na Zhang","doi":"10.2147/IJGM.S496996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To retrospectively compare the efficacy of Sacubitril/Valsartan and Benazepril in the treatment of heart failure in patients following acute myocardial infarction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of clinical data was conducted for 103 patients with heart failure following acute myocardial infarction admitted to our hospital from January 2021 to January 2024. All patients met complete inclusion and exclusion criteria. Based on the treatment interventions received, they were divided into a control group (n=51) and an observation group (n=52). All patients received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and conventional drug treatment upon admission. The control group received additional treatment with benazepril, while the observation group received Sacubitril/Valsartan on top of the baseline treatment. A comparison was made between the two groups in terms of clinical treatment outcomes, cardiac function indicators [left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)], levels of inflammatory markers [high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6)], N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), incidence of adverse reactions, major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), and 6-minute walking distance (6MWD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No patients were lost to follow-up. After six months of treatment, the observation group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in left ventricular function parameters (LVESV, LVEDD, and LVEF) and reductions in inflammatory markers (hs-CRP, IL-6) and NT-proBNP levels compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The observation group also had a significantly lower incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (11.54% vs 31.37%, P < 0.05) and a greater improvement in 6-minute walking distance (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was comparable between the two groups (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sacubitril/Valsartan is a safe and effective treatment for heart failure post-AMI, offering significant improvements in cardiac function, inflammatory response, exercise capacity, and a reduction in MACE risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":14131,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of General Medicine","volume":"17 ","pages":"6367-6376"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665437/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective Analysis of Sacubitril/Valsartan vs Benazepril for Treating Heart Failure Following Acute Myocardial Infarction.\",\"authors\":\"Li Zhao, Yuanyuan Ren, Donghui Qin, Xue Yang, Zhuo Chen, Na Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/IJGM.S496996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To retrospectively compare the efficacy of Sacubitril/Valsartan and Benazepril in the treatment of heart failure in patients following acute myocardial infarction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of clinical data was conducted for 103 patients with heart failure following acute myocardial infarction admitted to our hospital from January 2021 to January 2024. All patients met complete inclusion and exclusion criteria. Based on the treatment interventions received, they were divided into a control group (n=51) and an observation group (n=52). All patients received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and conventional drug treatment upon admission. The control group received additional treatment with benazepril, while the observation group received Sacubitril/Valsartan on top of the baseline treatment. A comparison was made between the two groups in terms of clinical treatment outcomes, cardiac function indicators [left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)], levels of inflammatory markers [high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6)], N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), incidence of adverse reactions, major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), and 6-minute walking distance (6MWD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No patients were lost to follow-up. After six months of treatment, the observation group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in left ventricular function parameters (LVESV, LVEDD, and LVEF) and reductions in inflammatory markers (hs-CRP, IL-6) and NT-proBNP levels compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The observation group also had a significantly lower incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (11.54% vs 31.37%, P < 0.05) and a greater improvement in 6-minute walking distance (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was comparable between the two groups (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sacubitril/Valsartan is a safe and effective treatment for heart failure post-AMI, offering significant improvements in cardiac function, inflammatory response, exercise capacity, and a reduction in MACE risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of General Medicine\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"6367-6376\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665437/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of General Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S496996\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of General Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S496996","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:回顾性比较苏比里尔/缬沙坦与贝那普利治疗急性心肌梗死后心力衰竭的疗效。方法:回顾性分析我院2021年1月至2024年1月收治的103例急性心肌梗死后心力衰竭患者的临床资料。所有患者完全符合纳入和排除标准。根据所接受的治疗干预措施分为对照组(n=51)和观察组(n=52)。所有患者入院时均接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)及常规药物治疗。对照组在基础治疗的基础上加用贝那普利,观察组在基础治疗的基础上加用苏比里尔/缬沙坦。比较两组患者的临床治疗结果、心功能指标[左室收缩末容积(LVESV)、左室舒张末容积(LVEDD)、左室射血分数(LVEF)]、炎症标志物[高敏c反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、白细胞介素-6 (IL-6)]、n端前b型利钠肽(NT-proBNP)水平、不良反应发生率、主要心脏不良事件(mace)、6分钟步行距离(6MWD)。结果:无患者失访。治疗6个月后,观察组左心室功能参数(LVESV、LVEDD、LVEF)改善显著,炎症标志物(hs-CRP、IL-6)、NT-proBNP水平降低显著(P < 0.05)。观察组患者主要心脏不良事件(mace)发生率(11.54% vs 31.37%, P < 0.05)显著降低(P < 0.05), 6分钟步行距离(P < 0.05)明显改善(P < 0.05)。两组不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:Sacubitril/缬沙坦是一种安全有效的治疗ami后心力衰竭的方法,可显著改善心功能、炎症反应、运动能力,降低MACE风险。
Retrospective Analysis of Sacubitril/Valsartan vs Benazepril for Treating Heart Failure Following Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Objective: To retrospectively compare the efficacy of Sacubitril/Valsartan and Benazepril in the treatment of heart failure in patients following acute myocardial infarction.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of clinical data was conducted for 103 patients with heart failure following acute myocardial infarction admitted to our hospital from January 2021 to January 2024. All patients met complete inclusion and exclusion criteria. Based on the treatment interventions received, they were divided into a control group (n=51) and an observation group (n=52). All patients received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and conventional drug treatment upon admission. The control group received additional treatment with benazepril, while the observation group received Sacubitril/Valsartan on top of the baseline treatment. A comparison was made between the two groups in terms of clinical treatment outcomes, cardiac function indicators [left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)], levels of inflammatory markers [high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6)], N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), incidence of adverse reactions, major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), and 6-minute walking distance (6MWD).
Results: No patients were lost to follow-up. After six months of treatment, the observation group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in left ventricular function parameters (LVESV, LVEDD, and LVEF) and reductions in inflammatory markers (hs-CRP, IL-6) and NT-proBNP levels compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The observation group also had a significantly lower incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (11.54% vs 31.37%, P < 0.05) and a greater improvement in 6-minute walking distance (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was comparable between the two groups (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: Sacubitril/Valsartan is a safe and effective treatment for heart failure post-AMI, offering significant improvements in cardiac function, inflammatory response, exercise capacity, and a reduction in MACE risk.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas.
A key focus of the journal is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient. Patient perspectives such as satisfaction, quality of life, health literacy and communication and their role in developing new healthcare programs and optimizing clinical outcomes are major areas of interest for the journal.
As of 1st April 2019, the International Journal of General Medicine will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.